Developing Measures of Educational Change for Academic Health Care Teams Implementing the Chronic Care Model in Teaching Practices

Oregon Health & Science University Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 09/2010; 25 Suppl 4(S4):S586-92. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1358-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Chronic Care Model (CCM) is a multidimensional framework designed to improve care for patients with chronic health conditions. The model strives for productive interactions between informed, activated patients and proactive practice teams, resulting in better clinical outcomes and greater satisfaction. While measures for improving care may be clear, measures of residents' competency to provide chronic care do not exist. This report describes the process used to develop educational measures and results from CCM settings that used them to monitor curricular innovations.
Twenty-six academic health care teams participating in the national and California Academic Chronic Care Collaboratives.
Using successive discussion groups and surveys, participants engaged in an iterative process to identify desirable and feasible educational measures for curricula that addressed educational objectives linked to the CCM. The measures were designed to facilitate residency programs' abilities to address new accreditation requirements and tested with teams actively engaged in redesigning educational programs.
Field notes from each discussion and lists from work groups were synthesized using the CCM framework. Descriptive statistics were used to report survey results and measurement performance.
Work groups generated educational objectives and 17 associated measurements. Seventeen (65%) teams provided feasibility and desirability ratings for the 17 measures. Two process measures were selected for use by all teams. Teams reported variable success using the measures. Several teams reported use of additional measures, suggesting more extensive curricular change.
Using an iterative process in collaboration with program participants, we successfully defined a set of feasible and desirable education measures for academic health care teams using the CCM. These were used variably to measure the results of curricular changes, while simultaneously addressing requirements for residency accreditation.

Download full-text


Available from: Lloyd P Provost, Aug 07, 2015
  • Source
    • "The chronic care model aims to transform the system of chronic disease care delivery from acute and reactive to proactive, planned, and population based (Coleman et al., 2009; Norris, Glasgow, Engelgau, O'Connor, & McCulloch, 2003; Tsai, Morton, Mangione, & Keeler, 2005; Wagner et al., 1996a, 1996b, 2001). This multidimensional framework was developed as a foundation for the redesign of care practices, and seeks to improve the quality of chronic care delivery through enhanced productive interactions between informed, activated patients and proactive care teams (Bowen et al., 2010). Wagner et al. (2001) designed the chronic care model based on evidence from a review of interventions to improve quality of chronic care delivery (Wagner et al., 1996a, 1996b). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Empirical evidence on sustainability of programs that improve the quality of care delivery over time is lacking. Therefore, this study aims to identify the predictive role of short and long term improvements in quality of chronic care delivery on program sustainability. In this longitudinal study, professionals [2010 (T0): n=218, 55% response rate; 2011 (T1): n=300, 68% response rate; 2012 (T2): n=265, 63% response rate] from 22 Dutch disease-management programs completed surveys assessing quality of care and program sustainability. Our study findings indicated that quality of chronic care delivery improved significantly in the first 2 years after implementation of the disease-management programs. At T1, overall quality, self-management support, delivery system design, and integration of chronic care components, as well as health care delivery and clinical information systems and decision support, had improved. At T2, overall quality again improved significantly, as did community linkages, delivery system design, clinical information systems, decision support and integration of chronic care components, and self-management support. Multilevel regression analysis revealed that quality of chronic care delivery at T0 (p<0.001) and quality changes in the first (p<0.001) and second (p<0.01) years predicted program sustainability. In conclusion this study showed that disease-management programs based on the chronic care model improved the quality of chronic care delivery over time and that short and long term changes in the quality of chronic care delivery predicted the sustainability of the projects.
    Social Science [?] Medicine 01/2014; 101:148-54. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.035 · 2.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Similar to the findings of the current study, participating sites noted improvements in provider job satisfaction that corresponded with receipt of training on and delivery of the Chronic Care Model to patients, including support for patient self-management [22]. The initiatives focused on residents as ''learners'' and demonstrated increases in their exposure to self-management support strategies (range across participating sites 21–100%) [44]. Activities related to selfmanagement generally consisted of use of standardized patient self-management forms (e.g., for action planning), support for patient problem-solving, and completion of personal actions plans by the residents themselves [45]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a web-based self-management training for health professionals. Patients spend 99% of their time outside the healthcare system. Thus self-management support from health professionals is central to optimal care. Our objective was to teach health professionals the skills to provide this support. METHODS: Primary care residents and practicing providers enrolled in six groups. Each group received four web-based interactive training sessions derived from self-efficacy theory. Retrospective-pre/post assessed changes in self-management beliefs and confidence. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction compared responses. Focus groups solicited qualitative feedback. RESULTS: Fifty-seven residents and providers across the United States enrolled. Residents demonstrated positive changes on all belief questions (P 0.001-0.012). Practicing providers had a non-significant positive change on one and significant changes on the remainder (P 0.001-0.018). Both types of participants demonstrated significant increases on confidence questions regarding their ability to support self-management (P<0.01 for all). Participants described learned techniques as being useful, reducing burnout, and increasing acceptance of patient involvement in care planning. CONCLUSION: The web-based self-management support training for health professionals was feasible and changed beliefs and confidence. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The program may maximize patient self-management by increasing provider self-efficacy and skill for self-management support.
    Patient Education and Counseling 09/2012; 90(1). DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2012.09.003 · 2.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two chronic care collaboratives (The National Collaborative and the California Collaborative) were convened to facilitate implementing the chronic care model (CCM) in academic medical centers and into post-graduate medical education. We developed and implemented an electronic team survey (ETS) to elicit, in real-time, team member's experiences in caring for people with chronic illness and the effect of the Collaborative on teams and teamwork. The ETS is a qualitative survey based on Electronic Event Sampling Methodology. It is designed to collect meaningful information about daily experience and any event that might influence team members' daily work and subsequent outcomes. Forty-one residency programs from 37 teaching hospitals participated in the collaboratives and comprised faculty and resident physicians, nurses, and administrative staff. Each team member participating in the collaboratives received an e-mail with directions to complete the ETS for four weeks during 2006 (the National Collaborative) and 2007 (the California Collaborative). At the team level, the response rate to the ETS was 87% with team members submitting 1,145 narrative entries. Six key themes emerged from the analysis, which were consistent across all sites. Among teams that achieved better clinical outcomes on Collaborative clinical indicators, an additional key theme emerged: professional work satisfaction, or "Joy in Work". In contrast, among teams that performed lower in collaborative measures, two key themes emerged that reflected the effect of providing care in difficult institutional environments-"lack of professional satisfaction" and awareness of "system failures". The ETS provided a unique perspective into team performance and the day-to-day challenges and opportunities in chronic illness care. Further research is needed to explore systematic approaches to integrating the results from this study into the design of improvement efforts for clinical teams.
    Journal of General Internal Medicine 09/2010; 25 Suppl 4:S581-5. DOI:10.1007/s11606-010-1408-8 · 3.42 Impact Factor
Show more