Implementing evidence-based patient self-management programs in the Veterans Health Administration: perspectives on delivery system design considerations.

Richard L. Roudebush VAMC, VA Stroke QUERI Center and HSRD COE, Indiana University Dept. of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 01/2010; 25 Suppl 1(S1):68-71. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1123-5
Source: PubMed


While many patient self-management (PSM) programs have been developed and evaluated for effectiveness, less effort has been devoted to translating and systematically delivering PSM in primary and specialty care. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to review delivery system design considerations for implementing self-management programs in practice. As lessons are learned about implementing PSM programs in Veterans Health Administration (VHA), resource allocation by healthcare organization for formatting PSM programs, providing patient access, facilitating PSM, and incorporating support tools to foster PSM among its consumers can be refined and tailored. Redesigning the system to deliver and support PSM will be important as implementation researchers translate evidence based PSM practices into routine care and evaluate its impact on the health-related quality of life of veterans living with chronic disease.

Download full-text


Available from: Marylou Guihan, Dec 12, 2013
21 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has been at the vanguard of information technology (IT) and use of comprehensive electronic health records. Despite the widespread use of health IT in the VA, there are still a variety of key questions that need to be answered in order to maximize the utility of IT to improve patient access to quality services. This paper summarizes the potential of IT to enhance healthcare access, key gaps in current evidence linking IT and access, and methodologic challenges for related research. We also highlight four key issues to be addressed when implementing and evaluating the impact of IT interventions on improving access to quality care: 1) Understanding broader needs/perceptions of the Veteran population and their caregivers regarding use of IT to access healthcare services and related information. 2) Understanding individual provider/clinician needs/perceptions regarding use of IT for patient access to healthcare. 3) System/Organizational issues within the VA and other organizations related to the use of IT to improve access. 4) IT integration and information flow with non-VA entities. While the VA is used as an example, the issues are salient for healthcare systems that are beginning to take advantage of IT solutions.
    Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2011; 26 Suppl 2(S2):623-7. DOI:10.1007/s11606-011-1789-3 · 3.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare a multi-component Motivational interviewing (MI)/Self-Management (SM) intervention to a multi-component education intervention to improve skin-protective behaviors and prevent skin worsening in Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI) hospitalized for severe pressure ulcers. Single blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial SETTING: 6 VA SCI Centers PARTICIPANTS: Veterans admitted for a severe (stage III/IV) pressure ulcer (PrU) at were followed up to 6 months post-discharge. Telephone-based individual MI counseling plus SM skills group (MI+SM, n=71) versus an active control group of telephone-based individual educational counseling plus a group education (ED, n=72). Self-reported skin protective behaviors, objective skin worsening RESULTS: ITT analyses found non-significant increases in skin behaviors in the SM+MI versus ED arms at 3 and 6 months. The difference in behaviors used between SM+MI vs. ED participants was 4.6% (95% CI -11.3 - 2.7) (0-3 months) and 3.0% (95% CI -8.7 - 3.9) (0-6 months). High rates of skin worsening were observed (n=74, 51.7%), usually within 3 months post-discharge, most frequently within the month post-discharge. Skin worsening, skin-related visits and re-admissions did not differ by study arm. Study limitations are presented. For persons with chronic SCI and severe PrUs, complicated by multiple comorbidities, a primary focus on improving patient behavior is likely insufficient to address the complex problem of PrUs in SCI. More health care systems-level changes such as collaborative care may be needed to reduce PrU recurrence, especially in this era in which many people are discharged from the hospital unhealed or with little sitting tolerance.
    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 01/2014; 95(7). DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.01.012 · 2.57 Impact Factor