Article

Telbivudine for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection

Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, University of Southampton, First Floor, Epsilon House, Enterprise Road, Southampton Science Park, Southampton, UK.
Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) 10/2009; 13 Suppl 3:23-30. DOI: 10.3310/hta13suppl3/04
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper presents a summary of the evidence review group (ERG) report into the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telbivudine for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in adults based upon a review of the manufacturer's submission to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as part of the single technology appraisal (STA) process. The submission's evidence came from one randomised controlled trial (RCT) (GLOBE) of reasonable methodological quality comparing telbivudine with lamivudine. One other RCT that appeared to meet the inclusion criteria was excluded from the submission. For the primary outcome of therapeutic response telbivudine was statistically superior to lamivudine at weeks 52 and 104 for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients, and at week 104 for HBeAg-negative patients. There were statistically significant differences in favour of telbivudine for some secondary outcomes at 2 years including hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA reduction, HBV DNA non-detectability and alanine aminotransferase normalisation though not for HBeAg-positive patients. In HBeAg-positive patients there was no significant difference between treatment groups for HBeAg loss or seroconversion at any time point. The incidence of adverse events was similar between treatments. Two RCTs comparing entecavir with lamivudine were included in the indirect comparison; however, this was poorly conducted and the results should be treated with caution. The manufacturer developed two economic models to determine the cost-effectiveness of telbivudine. Evidence on the efficacy of telbivudine and lamivudine was taken from the GLOBE trial; efficacy of adefovir was based on assumption. There was a lack of critical assessment and assurance of the quality of the data used to populate the models. The manufacturer concluded that telbivudine is a cost-effective option compared with lamivudine using evidence from the viral load model [HBeAg-positive patients/HBeAg-negative patients: mean incremental cost 19,087 pounds/49,003 pounds, mean quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain 1.30/4.67, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) 14,665 pounds/10,497 pounds per QALY]. Resubmitted results after a request for clarification by the ERG gave less favourable ICERs (HBeAg-positive patients/HBeAg-negative patients: mean incremental cost 23,983 pounds/41,910 pounds, mean QALY gain 1.56/2.07, ICER 15,377 pounds/20,256 pounds per QALY). The manufacturer concluded that telbivudine is a cost-effective option (on its own or followed by adefovir) for patients who have developed resistance to first-line telbivudine treatment; however, the presentation of the results was not ideal. In conclusion, although telbivudine was statistically superior to lamivudine for most antiviral outcomes, the difference was not clinically significant; in addition, the cost-effectiveness evidence for telbivudine presented in the manufacturer's submission was limited. The NICE guidance issued as a result of the STA states that telbivudine is not recommended for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and that people currently receiving telbivudine should have the option to continue therapy until they and their clinicians consider it appropriate to stop.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
83 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The thermal decomposition processes of eight purine nucleoside analogs were measured with thermogravimetry (TG) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The IR spectra and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) of purine nucleoside analogs and their residues from thermal decomposition at various temperatures were determined. The molecular bond orders were calculated with an ab initio method from the GAMESS program. The mechanisms of thermal decomposition for purine nucleoside analogs were discussed. The results indicate that the main decomposition pathway of purine nucleoside analogs is the fracture of the N-glycosidic bond first, and the residues of the initial stage of decomposition are mainly corresponding purines. A part of purine nucleoside analogs decomposes directly to small molecules and insoluble substances at the first stage. When the N-glycosidic bond order is close to that of the weakest bond within purine ring, most of purine nucleoside analogs will decompose directly. The amino group at purine ring is easy to be oxidized, some oxidation products can be found in the residues of some purine nucleoside analogs. There is a positive correlation between the calculated weakest bond orders and the decomposition temperatures of purine nucleoside analogs. The stronger the weakest bond order, the higher the decomposition temperature. The molecular bond orders can serve as the basis to judge molecular thermal stability for analog compounds with similar molecular structure, size, and energy. The substituent group affects the thermal stability of the purine nucleoside analogs. Increasing the number of electron-donating groups on the purine ring and furanose ring will enhance the N-glycosidic bond, will increase the temperature of thermal decomposition, and be likely to change the mechanism of thermal decomposition.
    Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 01/2015; 111. DOI:10.1016/j.jaap.2014.12.024 · 3.07 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two rescue strategies for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with resistance to adefovir dipivoxil (ADV). This prospective study included 58 HBeAg-positive CHB patients with resistance to ADV; 30 patients underwent telbivudine (LdT) plus ADV combination therapy and 28 patients switched to entecavir (ETV) monotherapy. After 48 weeks of treatment, the rates of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <3 log copies/mL in the LdT plus ADV group and the ETV group were not significantly different (73.3% vs 57.1%, P = 0.195). Six patients receiving LdT plus ADV had HBeAg seroconversion, while none of the patients receiving ETV alone had HBeAg seroconversion (20% vs 0%, P = 0.039). During the 48-week treatment period, two patients in the ETV monotherapy group had viral breakthrough and the strains were confirmed to be of a variant associated with ETV resistance (rtM204V+ rtL180M+ rtT184G), while one patient receiving LdT plus ADV had viral breakthrough and an LdT-associated resistance mutation (rtM204I) was detected. For the majority of the patients, both LdT plus ADV combination treatment or ETV monotherapy were generally well tolerated, and no serious side effects were observed. Both LdT plus ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy led to significant decreases in serum HBV DNA in HBeAg-positive CHB patients with resistance to ADV, and LdT plus ADV combination therapy exhibited a significantly higher rate of HBeAg seroconversion compared with ETV monotherapy.
    Journal of Viral Hepatitis 04/2013; 20 Suppl 1:40-5. DOI:10.1111/jvh.12062 · 3.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the efficacy of telbivudine (LdT) + adefovir (ADV) vs continuation of lamivudine (LAM) + ADV in patients with LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who show a suboptimal response to LAM + ADV. This was a randomized, active-control, open-label, single-center, parallel trial. All eligible patients were enrolled in this study in Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, between March 2010 and March 2011. Hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg)-positive CHB patients whose serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA remained detectable despite at least 6 mo of LAM + ADV therapy were included. Enrolled patients were randomized to either switching to LdT (600 mg/d orally) plus ADV (10 mg/d orally) (LdT + ADV group) or to continuation with LAM (100 mg/d orally) plus ADV (10 mg/d orally) (LAM + ADV group), and were followed for 48 wk. One hundred and six patients completed the 48-wk treatment period. Serum HBV DNA, HBeAg status, liver biochemistry and safety were monitored at baseline and week 12, 24, 36 and 48. The duration of prior LAM + ADV treatment was 18.3 (LdT + ADV) and 14.9 mo (LAM + ADV), respectively (P = 0.131). No difference was seen in baseline serum HBV DNA between the two groups [3.66 (LdT + ADV) vs 3.76 (LAM + ADV) log10 IU/mL, P = 0.729]. At week 48, although there was no significant difference in the mean reduction of serum HBV DNA from baseline between LdT + ADV group and LAM + ADV group (-0.81 vs -0.47 log10 IU/mL, P = 0.167), more patients in the LdT + ADV group had undetectable HBV DNA levels compared to those in the LAM + ADV group (30.2% vs 11.5%, P = 0.019). Three patients with LdT + ADV treatment and 2 patients with LAM + ADV treatment achieved HBeAg loss. The patients in both groups tolerated the treatment well without serious adverse events. The proportion of patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) in the LdT + ADV group increased from 49.1% (26/53) at baseline to 58.5% (31/53) at week 48, while that in the LAM + ADV group decreased from 37.7% (20/53) at baseline to 30.2% (16/53) at week 48. The switch to LdT + ADV in suboptimal responders to LAM + ADV showed a significantly higher rate of virologic response at week 48. These results suggest that LdT + ADV could be a therapeutic option for patients who are unable to use enofovir disoproxil fumarate for any reason.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 11/2013; 19(43):7671-9. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7671 · 2.43 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
28 Downloads
Available from
May 27, 2014