Early impact of the federally mandated Local Wellness Policy on physical activity in rural, low-income elementary schools in Colorado.

Rocky Moutain Prevention Research Center, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, USA.
Journal of Public Health Policy (Impact Factor: 1.75). 01/2009; 30 Suppl 1:S141-60. DOI: 10.1057/jphp.2008.50
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The What's Working project described the initial impact of the United States' federally mandated Local Wellness Policy in rural, low-income elementary schools located in Colorado. Before and after the Local Wellness Policy mandate went into effect, a survey about school features related to nutrition and physical activity was sent to a random sample of 45 rural elementary schools (i.e., schools located outside of urban areas), in which at least 40% of students qualified for free or reduced-cost lunch. Overall, opportunities for physical activity did not change after the policy went into effect: although time in physical education increased by 14 min per week (P=0.10), time for recess decreased by roughly 19 min per week (P=0.10). Policies supporting student participation in physical education and recess (an unstructured time during school hours when students are allowed to play outside) did not change. The researchers coded Local Wellness Policies and found them to have weak wording that produced minimal impact. Content analysis of key informant interviews suggested several barriers to the impact of the Local Wellness Policies: (1) competing pressures facing school districts, (2) lack of resources devoted to the Local Wellness Policy, (3) principals' lack of knowledge about the policy, and (4) lack of accountability mechanisms to ensure policy implementation. Financial resources and more effective communication about Local Wellness Policies among school districts and principals are needed to elevate the importance of and increase opportunities for physical activity in rural, low-income Colorado elementary schools.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND Despite broad public support and legislative activity, policies intended to promote physical activity in schools have not produced positive outcomes in levels of physical activity or student health. What explains the broad failure of Physical Activity Policies (PAPs)? Thus far, PAP research has used limited quantitative methods to assess PAP outcomes. New paradigms of qualitative policy implementation research can make important contributions to explaining the causes of policy failure and to the future design of more efficacious PAP legislation.METHODS This analysis is a case study of South Carolina's 2005 Student Health and Fitness Act (SHFA). Written documents, investigators' observation and experience, and an interview with a key stakeholder were analyzed to for themes based on theoretical frameworks from education implementation research including (1) bottom-up and top-down perspectives, (2) conceptualizing policy as practice, and (3) the implementer as learner.RESULTS“Weak policy signals” in SHFA undermined the implementation of PAP in 3 problematic areas: inadequate capacity development for implementers, inappropriate measures of implementation, and insufficient funding.CONCLUSIONS These findings illustrate the contributions of qualitative research and establish the need for further qualitative research into PAP implementation processes. To ensure successful future physical activity policies, policymakers, and stakeholders need to consider implementation, evaluation, and funding from the beginning phases of policy development.
    Journal of School Health 09/2014; 84(9). · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: High tunnels and plastic mulch are successfully used throughout the world to increase productivity of high-value specialty vegetable and fruit crops. Currently these technologies are not widely used in the Pacific Northwest (PNW), Mid-South and Southeast regions of the United States. In order to better understand the current status of grower knowledge and use of high tunnels, plastic mulch and biodegradable mulch, a key informant survey was conducted in Washington, Tennessee and Texas. Of the 34 farmer respondents, 38% used high tunnels to produce 27 crops, primarily tomatoes, lettuce/salad greens, and peppers. All farmers who used high tunnels were either satisfied or very satisfied with them; however, wind damage and humidity/condensation were main concerns. Most farmers (79%) wanted to learn more about high tunnels, especially the specific crop production practices and structures best suited to their needs. Three quarters of the farmers surveyed had used plastic mulch, primarily for weed control for tomatoes, strawberries, peppers, and cucurbits, and most (64%) were very satisfied with the results. However, plastic mulch removal and disposal were a primary concern. One quarter of the farmers had used biodegradable plastic mulch, primarily for tomatoes and cucurbit crops, but they were not satisfied due to unpredictable and incomplete biodegradation. Most farmers lacked knowledge and needed more information about biodegradable mulch products and their availability and cost. This information is being used to guide a multi-state specialty crops team investigating the adaptation and economic feasibility of high-value specialty vegetable and fruit production with biodegradable mulches and high tunnels. Introduction High tunnels and plastic mulch are successfully used throughout the world to increase productivity of high-value specialty vegetable and fruit crops. There is an estimated 586,000 acres worldwide under high tunnel cultivation; China leads with 350,000 acres, while the U.S. has an estimated 5,000 acres (Lamont, 2009). Data for the U.S. regarding the actual area under high tunnel production and the number and priority of crops in high tunnel cultivation is currently insufficient. In a recent survey of extension specialists in 46 states (Carey et al., 2009), there was a significant variation in the definition of high tunnels from state to state, thereby complicating the ability to access production statistics. According to Lamont (2009), tomatoes, peppers, cucumbers, melons, lettuce, summer squash and eggplant are the primary vegetable crops grown worldwide in high tunnels, with cut flowers, small fruit, and tree fruit also of importance. Tomatoes and cut flowers are the primary high tunnel crops in the U.S. (Carey et al., 2009).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The federally mandated Local Wellness Policy (LWP) was intended to promote student health in schools. This study assesses the 5-year effects of the LWP on the health practices of rural elementary schools in Colorado. One year before and 5 years after the LWP mandate, a survey was administered to a random sample of principals, physical education (PE) teachers, and food-service managers in 45 rural, low-income elementary schools in Colorado. Response rates were 71% in 2005 and 89% in 2011. Minutes for PE and recess did not increase, nor did offerings of fresh fruits and vegetables. More schools adopted policies prohibiting teachers from taking recess away as punishment (9.7% in 2005 vs 38.5% in 2011, P = .02) or for making up missed instructional time, class work, or tests in other subjects (3.2% in 2005 vs 28.2% in 2011, P = .03). More schools scheduled recess before lunch (22.6% in 2005 vs 46.2% in 2011, P = .04) and developed policies for vending machines (42.9% in 2005 vs 85.7% in 2011, P = .01) and parties (21.4% in 2005 vs 57.9% in 2011, P = .004). Changes in school practices are modest, and arguably the important school practices such as increased PE and recess time and increased offerings of fruits and vegetables in the lunch line have not changed in the 5 years since the mandate went into effect. Further investigation is needed to identify the knowledge, skills, and attitudes as well as financial and physical resources required for school administrators to make changes in school practices.
    Preventing chronic disease 11/2013; 10:E184. · 1.96 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
May 29, 2014