Effects of medications and surgery on intraocular pressure fluctuation.

Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Survey of Ophthalmology (Impact Factor: 3.51). 11/2008; 53 Suppl1:S45-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.08.009
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Intraocular pressure (IOP) varies dynamically throughout the circadian cycle. IOP elevations during the nocturnal period may be particularly important in the pathogenesis of glaucoma, although sleeping IOP cannot be measured at this time. Additionally, IOP fluctuations may be an independent risk factor for glaucoma. However, not all glaucoma therapies are equally effective at lowering IOP throughout the 24-hour period. The prostaglandin analogs have excellent IOP control throughout the 24-hour period, although less at night than during the day. In contrast, some other classes of medications, such as the beta-blockers, have little or no IOP-lowering effect at night. The prostaglandin analogs also have excellent persistency of IOP lowering, lasting at least as long as the 24-hour dosing period, and likely much longer. Glaucoma filtering surgery appears to have even better 24-hour IOP reduction and smaller fluctuations than maximal medical therapy including prostaglandin analogs.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose To evaluate intraocular pressure parameters and the role of other ocular risk factors in the progression of primary open angle glaucoma. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective analysis of long-term glaucomatous progression in 140 patients (280 eyes) with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) between 1998 and 2009. After analyzing their disease progression, the eyes of our patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (G1) consisted of eyes with worsening of their POAG, and group 2 (G2) consisted of the eyes that remained stable. The indicators of progression studied were factors associated with glaucomatous optic neuropathy, other ocular risk factors, and treatment-related risk factors. Results We found 188 eyes with stable visual fields (G2) and 92 eyes with glaucoma progression (G1), for a progression rate of 32.9%. Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at diagnosis was statistically higher in the cases with progression, 22.78 mmHg vs. 19.9 mmHg for stable cases (P = 0.03; OR = 5.25). Higher final intraocular pressure (IOP) was also associated with progression (16.82 mmHg for G1 vs. 14.85 mmHg for G2; P = 0.051). IOP less or equal to 12.75 mmHg was identified as the target pressure for our population. Progressed eyes also showed a statistically higher diurnal peak IOP (23.13 mmHg vs. 19.87 mmHg for G2; P = 0.007). Long term IOP fluctuation was also predictive of progression (4.43 mmHg for G1 vs. 2.31 mmHg for G2; P = 0.003). Eyes with initial visual field defect more than 8.2 dB had 4.8 times the risk of progression (P = 0.07). However, eyes diagnosed in an early glaucoma stage had four times the chance of maintaining a stable visual field (P = 0.003). Statistically significant risk factors between the two groups also included: pseudoexfoliation (OR = 2.84; P = 0.05), cornea less than 505 μ (OR = 10.89; P = 0.005), topical beta blockers (P = 0.003), and more than two topical medications (OR = 3; P = 0.003). Conclusion It is currently known that IOP lowering contributes to glaucoma stabilization. However, this single criterion remains insufficient, as other, particularly ocular, factors have been implicated in glaucoma progression. Identification of these risk factors allows for a better therapeutic approach toward these patients, so as to preserve their vision and quality of life.
    Journal francais d'ophtalmologie 04/2013; 36(4):324–330. DOI:10.1016/j.jfo.2012.05.010 · 0.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:: The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between the mean deviation (MD) slope as the progressive rate of visual field defects and the follow-up intraocular pressure (IOP) in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients. METHODS:: This study was a retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study. A total of 287 eyes from 287 Japanese OAG patients were examined. The MD slope of the Humphrey Field Analyzer was calculated and compared with the follow-up IOP. OAG was classified into the high-tension group (>21 mm Hg) and the normal-tension group (≤21 mm Hg) on the basis of the highest recorded IOP without treatment, and then the 2 groups were compared. After setting a threshold for the progression rate at -0.3 dB/y, related factors were compared between the fast-progression and slow-progression eyes in each group. RESULTS:: The correlation line between the follow-up IOP and the MD slope was statistically significant in the high-tension group but not in the normal-tension group. Compared with eyes with slow progression, eyes with fast progression in the high-tension group were older and had a higher mean IOP, greater highest and lowest IOPs, and a smaller mean IOP reduction ratio, whereas eyes with fast progression in the normal-tension group had a greater SD of the mean IOP, a larger IOP range, and a greater highest IOP. CONCLUSIONS:: Eyes with a faster visual field progression tended to have a higher follow-up IOP in the high-tension group and larger IOP fluctuations in the normal-tension group of OAG patients. We should monitor both the follow-up IOP and fluctuations in IOP to provide a safer and more reliable visual field prognosis for OAG.
    Journal of glaucoma 05/2013; 22(9). DOI:10.1097/IJG.0b013e318264b779 · 2.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intraocular pressure in the sitting position changes minimally during sleep, although aqueous humor flow decreases by 50% or more at night. The explanation for this apparent discrepancy has been unclear. This study investigated the roles of outflow facility, episcleral venous pressure (EVP), and uveoscleral outflow in maintaining IOP at night. Forty-two eyes of 21 healthy subjects (age 47-76 years, mean 59 years) were studied. Aqueous humor flow rate, IOP in the sitting position, outflow facility, and EVP were measured in each eye during the middiurnal period (2:00-4:00 PM). Uveoscleral flow was calculated from the other variables by using the modified Goldmann equation. These variables were remeasured during the midnocturnal period (2:00-4:00 AM) and compared with those measured during the diurnal period by using generalized estimating equation models. Intraocular pressure did not change from the middiurnal period (13.9 ± 3.0 mm Hg) to the midnocturnal period (13.0 ± 1.8 mm Hg, mean ± SD, P = 0.07), although aqueous humor flow rate decreased from 2.48 ± 0.96 μL/min to 1.27 ± 0.63 μL/min (P < 0.001). Outflow facility decreased from 0.23 ± 0.06 μL/min/mm Hg to 0.20 ± 0.06 μL/min/mm Hg (P = 0.004), and EVP was unchanged from the middiurnal period (7.4 ± 1.8 mm Hg) to the midnocturnal period (7.4 ± 2.2 mm Hg, P = 0.95). Uveoscleral outflow decreased 93%, from 0.94 ± 1.26 μL/min during the middiurnal period to 0.07 ± 0.78 μL/min (P = 0.008) during the midnocturnal period. The nocturnal decrease in aqueous humor flow rate in older, healthy subjects is compensated by a small decrease in outflow facility and a large decrease in uveoscleral outflow to maintain a stable IOP.
    Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 11/2013; 54(12):7623-9. DOI:10.1167/iovs.12-12690 · 3.66 Impact Factor