Reporting outcomes in clinical trials for bipolar disorder: a commentary and suggestions for change
ABSTRACT Newer outcome measures and statistical reporting that better translate efficacy data to evidence-based psychiatric care are needed when evaluating clinical trials for bipolar disorder. Using efficacy studies as illustrations, the authors review and recommend changes in the reporting of traditional clinical outcomes both in the acute and maintenance phases of bipolar disorder.
Definitions of response, remission, relapse, recovery, and recurrence are reviewed and recommendations for change are made. These suggestions include reporting the numbers needed to treat or harm (NNT or NNH), and a ratio of the two, likelihood of help or harm (LHH), as an important element of the effect size (ES). Moreover, models of prediction that conduct sensitivity or specificity analyses and utilize decision trees to help predict positive and negative outcomes of interest (for instance, excessive weight gain, or time to remission) using positive or negative predictive values (PPV or NPV) are reviewed for potential value to clinicians. Finally, functional and cognitive assessments are recommended for maintenance studies of bipolar disorder.
The examples provided in this manuscript underscore that reporting the NNT or NNH, or alternative effect sizes, or using PPV or NPV may be of particular value to clinicians. Such reports are likely to help translate efficacy-driven clinical data to information that will more readily guide clinicians on the benefits and risks of specific interventions in bipolar disorder.
The authors opine that reporting these newer outcomes, such as NNT or NNH, area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), or PPV or NPV will help translate the results of clinical trials into a language that is more readily understood by clinicians. Moreover, assessing and evaluating functional and cognitive outcomes will not only inform clinicians about potential differences among therapeutic options, but likely will make it easier to communicate such differences to persons with bipolar illness or to their families. Finally, we hope such scientific and research efforts will translate to optimism for recovery-based outcomes in persons with bipolar disorder.
SourceAvailable from: Charles L BowdenThe World Journal of Biological Psychiatry 04/2013; 14(3):154-219. DOI:10.3109/15622975.2013.770551. · 4.23 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Using N, N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) and methoxy polyethylene glycol methacrylate (MPEGMA) as raw materials, hydrophobically associating copolymer was synthesized by inverse emulsion polymerization and structurally confirmed by FTIR. Choosing partially hydrolyzed polymer of the copolymer as a relative permeability modifier, its intrinsic viscosity reaches 212.66 mL/g at 25 °C. Its adsorbability on the oil sandstone is investigated, that is to say, the equilibrium concentration is approximately 5100 mg/L while the saturated adsorption is about 0.652 mg/g. Temperature and salt also have a certain effect of RPM system based on the partially hydrolyzed polymer. Finally, the residual resistance factors to water and oil were measured by core displacement test. The results show that the flow resistance of the system to water is 19.9 times as large as that to oil. That is, the system has obvious selectivity to water and oil.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 12/2011; 80(1):69–74. DOI:10.1016/j.petrol.2011.10.013 · 1.10 Impact Factor
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 01/2013; · 9.37 Impact Factor