Article

Abdominal trauma after terrorist bombing attacks exhibits a unique pattern of injury

Department of General Surgery and Trauma Unit, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Annals of surgery (Impact Factor: 7.19). 08/2008; 248(2):303-9. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318180a3f7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The recent growth in the volume of civilian blast trauma caused by terrorist bombings warrants special attention to the specific pattern of injury associated with such attacks.
To characterize the abdominal injuries inflicted by terrorist-related explosions and to compare the pattern of injury with civilian, penetrating and blunt, abdominal trauma.
Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 181 patients with abdominal trauma requiring laparotomy, who were admitted to the Hadassah Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel, from October 2000 to December 2005. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to mechanism of injury: terror-related blast injury (n = 21), gunshot wounds (GSW) (n = 73) and blunt trauma (n = 87).
Median injury severity score in the blast group was significantly higher compared with GSW and blunt groups (34, 18, and 29, respectively, P < 0.0001). Injury to multiple body regions (> or = 3) occurred in 85.7% of blast group, 28.8% of GSW group, and 59.7% of blunt group (P < 0.001). The pattern of intra-abdominal injury was different between the groups. Bowel injury was found in 71.4% of blast victims, 64.4% of GSW, and 25.3% of blunt group (P < 0.001). Parenchymal injury was found in one third of patients in blast and GSW groups versus 60.9% of patients in blunt group (P = 0.001). Penetrating shrapnel was the cause of bowel injury in all but 1 patient in the blast group (94.4%).
Terrorist attacks generate more severe injuries to more body regions than other types of trauma. Abdominal injury inflicted by terrorist bombings causes a unique pattern of wounds, mainly injury to hollow organs. Shrapnel is the leading cause of abdominal injury following terrorist bombings.

2 Followers
 · 
117 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Terror attacks with explosive devices or mass shootings have introduced a new pattern of injuries into the civilian sector. The aim of this short review on the treatment principles for so-called penetrating war wounds is to remind surgeons who are not normally confronted with them of some basic rules to follow and pitfalls to avoid. This review article is based on literature research of the National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health MEDLINE database using PubMed, as well as updated books on war surgery and the author's own experience of war zones. Principles of treatment of penetrating war injuries to the head, neck, and torso are all based on damage control surgery focusing on hemorrhage and contamination control and early restoration of the deranged physiology. For injuries to the extremities, differences in treatment principles between low- and high-energy wounds are more important, although initial treatment is also focused on hemorrhage control. The surgical treatment should be based on thorough wound examination and debridement as well as fracture stabilization when required. Certain knowledge of the treatment of war wounds is necessary in all civilian hospitals that receive patients injured in terror attacks.
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 08/2014; 40(4):461-468. DOI:10.1007/s00068-014-0395-6 · 0.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: On April 15, 2013, two improvised explosive devices (IED) detonated at the 117th Boston Marathon, killing 3 people and injuring 264 others. In this article, the foreign bodies and injuries that presented at 2 of the responding level 1 trauma hospitals in Boston—Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital—will be reviewed with a broader discussion of blast injuries and imaging strategies.
    Seminars in Ultrasound CT and MRI 10/2014; 36(1). DOI:10.1053/j.sult.2014.10.006 · 1.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose To review the frequency, different patterns, anatomic severity, management, and prognosis of abdominal injuries in survivors of explosions, according to the main mechanism of injury. Methods A MEDLINE search was conducted from January 1982 to August 2013, including the following MeSH terms: blast injuries, abdominal injuries. EMBASE was also searched, with the same entries. Abdominal blast injuries (ABIs) have been defined as injuries resulting not only from the effects of the overpressure on abdominal organs, but also from the multimechanistic effects and projectile fragments resulting from the blast. Special emphasis was placed on the detailed assessment of ABIs in patients admitted to GMUGH (Gregorio Marañón University General Hospital) after the Madrid 2004 terrorist bombings, and in patients admitted to HYMC (Hillel Yaffe Medical Centre) in Hadera (Israel) following several bombing episodes. The anatomic severity of injuries was assessed by the abdominal component of the AIS, and the overall anatomic severity of casualties was assessed by means of the NISS. Results Abdominal injuries are not common in survivors of terrorist explosions, although they are a frequent finding in those immediately killed. Primary and tertiary blast injuries have predominated in survivors from explosions in enclosed spaces reported outside of Israel. In contrast, secondary blast injuries causing fragmentation wounds were predominant in suicide bombings in open and/or semi-confined spaces, mainly in Israel, and also in military conflicts. Multiple perforations of the ileum seem to be the most common primary blast injury to the bowel, but delayed bowel perforations are rare. Secondary blast injuries carry the highest anatomic severity and mortality rate. Most of the deaths assessed occurred early, with hemorrhagic shock from penetrating fragments as the main contributing factor. The negative laparotomy rate has been very variable, with higher rates reported, in general, from civilian hospitals attending a large number of casualties. Conclusions The pattern, severity, management, and prognosis of ABI vary considerably, in accordance with the main mechanism of injury.
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 08/2014; 40(4):451-460. DOI:10.1007/s00068-014-0397-4 · 0.38 Impact Factor