National trends and practices in breast MRI

Department of Radiology, University of California, Los Angeles, 200 UCLA Medical Plaza, Rm. 165-47, Box 956952, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
American Journal of Roentgenology (Impact Factor: 2.74). 08/2008; 191(2):332-9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3207
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The objective of our study was to report on the current practices of radiologists involved in the performance and interpretation of breast MRI in the United States.
We invited the 1,696 active physician members of the Society of Breast Imaging to participate in a survey addressing whether and how they performed and interpreted breast MRI. Respondents were asked to select one member of their practice to complete the survey. A total of 754 surveys were completed. Every respondent did not reply to every question.
Contrast-enhanced breast MRI was offered at 557 of 754 (73.8%) practices. Of these, 346 of 553 (62.6%) performed at least five breast MRI examinations per week, and only 56 of 553 (10.1%) performed > 20 per week. Radiologists qualified under the Mammography Quality Standards Act supervised the performance of and interpreted breast MRI in the majority of facilities. Of 552 respondents, breast MRI was interpreted as soft copy with computer-aided detection (CAD) in 280 practices (50.7%), as soft copy without CAD in 261 (47.3%), and as hard copy in 11 (2.0%). Of 551 respondents, 256 (46.5%) never and 207 (37.6%) rarely interpreted breast MRI without correlating mammography or sonography findings. The majority of respondents never (269/561, 48.0%) or rarely (165/561, 29.4%) interpreted breast MRI performed at an outside facility. Screening breast MRI was offered at 359 of 561 (64.0%) practices. Of the practices performing contrast-enhanced examinations, 173 of 557 (31.1%) did not perform MRI-guided interventional procedures.
Contrast-enhanced breast MRI is now widely used in the United States. The information gained from this survey should provide reasonable approaches for the development of professional practice guidelines.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. Patterns of surveillance among breast cancer survivors are not well characterized and lack evidence-based practice guidelines, particularly for imaging modalities other than mammography. We characterized breast imaging and related biopsy longitudinally among breast cancer survivors in relation to women's characteristics. Methods. Using data from a state-wide (New Hampshire) breast cancer screening registry linked to Medicare claims, we examined use of mammography, ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and biopsy among breast cancer survivors. We used generalized estimating equations (GEE) to model associations of breast surveillance with women's characteristics. Results. The proportion of women with mammography was high over the follow-up period (81.5% at 78 months), but use of US or MRI was much lower (8.0%—first follow-up window, 4.7% by 78 months). Biopsy use was consistent throughout surveillance periods (7.4%–9.4%). Surveillance was lower among older women and for those with a higher stage of diagnosis. Primary therapy was significantly associated with greater likelihood of breast surveillance. Conclusions. Breast cancer surveillance patterns for mammography, US, MRI, and related biopsy seem to be associated with age, stage, and treatment, but need a larger evidence-base for clinical recommendations.
    10/2012; 2012:347646. DOI:10.1155/2012/347646
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advances in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) breast MRI over the past decade have led to significant improvements in the detection of early breast cancer and higher accuracy in the detection of multifocal and multicentric disease. This has resulted in the increased application of breast MRI in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer globally. Nonetheless, the true role of DCE breast MRI in the management of breast cancer patients remains controversial. This article discusses the strengths and limitations of DCE breast MRI by reviewing existing and emerging data from the past decade. KeywordsBreast cancer or neoplasm-Magnetic resonance imaging-Outcomes-Breast conserving surgery
    Current Breast Cancer Reports 09/2010; 2(3):159-165. DOI:10.1007/s12609-010-0017-1
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Consideration is given to the problem of optimal scheduling for two queues competing for service at a single station, where the queues have finite capacities and the service rate is class-dependent. The cost structure is linear in the number of holding customers in the queues, combined with blocking costs incurred whenever arrivals encounter a full queue. It is shown that the optimal policy minimizing this criterion is of the switching type if the blocking cost is larger than the holding cost for each queue. Under certain conditions on the cost parameters, the optimal policy is shown to become a fixed-priority rule, whereas in an extreme but useful case it becomes threshold-based. Numerical computations are included to validate the analytical findings. Finally, the authors consider a practically tractable performance criterion and develop an adaptive control adjustment scheme for the threshold-based policy, using online performance sensitivity estimation
    Decision and Control, 1988., Proceedings of the 27th IEEE Conference on; 01/1989

Preview (3 Sources)

Available from