Providing Evidence-Based Practice to Ethnically Diverse Youths: Examples From the Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools (CBITS) Program

UCLA Semel Institute, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Los Angeles, CA 90024-6505, USA.
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 6.35). 08/2008; 47(8):858-62. DOI: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181799f19
Source: PubMed
Download full-text


Available from: Bradley Stein, Nov 13, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is clear that exposure to traumatic events is not uncommon in childhood and adolescence and psychologists working in schools should have some training in meeting the needs of this segment of the population. This manuscript summarizes the incidence of trauma in children worldwide and then discusses interventions for trauma (Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavior Therapy & Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools) which have been empirically validated for use with children and/or adolescents. A summary of a project (Project Fleur-de-lis) which attempted to integrate these two treatment approaches into a systematic intervention system is also discussed. In addition, the concept of post-traumatic growth, cultural considerations in working with children from diverse societies, and training needs of school psychologists are addressed.
    School Psychology International 08/2011; 32(5):448-463. DOI:10.1177/0143034311402916 · 0.59 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this paper is to provide a summary of evidence for the effectiveness and safety of commonly used crisis interventions in schools, such as critical incident stress debriefing (CISD), critical incident stress management (CISM), and psychological debriefing (PD). Two researchers independently searched relevant databases for reviews and meta-analyses in English language peer-reviewed journals using identified keywords. The database search was supplemented by hand searches of the reference lists of database-identified reviews. Selected reviews were compared and analyzed for the effectiveness of CISD/CISM/PD interventions. Research findings suggest that these interventions are ineffective and may be harmful. Evidence of effectiveness of CISD/CISM/PD interventions in schools is very limited. Given evidence of ineffectiveness and potential harm of CISD/CISM/PD interventions in adults and limited evidence of these interventions in schools, there is no compelling reason to implement CISD/CISM/PD following crisis events in schools. KeywordsCritical incident stress debriefing (CISD)-Critical incident stress management (CISM)-Psychological debriefing-Crisis intervention-School
    Educational Psychology Review 09/2010; 22(3):339-347. DOI:10.1007/s10648-010-9139-2 · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For many children, trauma exposure is a common and chronic experience. Chronic trauma exposure during childhood significantly increases the risk for emotional/behavioral disorders and academic failure. There is a critical need for school psychologists, and the schools in which they work, to understand the unique needs of students with or at risk for emotional disorders or academic difficulties secondary to trauma exposure. This article reviews the effects of trauma exposure on the psychosocial and academic functioning of children and discusses a public health framework for building social-emotional protective factors into the school setting to foster resilience to trauma. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Psychology in the Schools 08/2011; 48(7):738 - 754. DOI:10.1002/pits.20584 · 0.72 Impact Factor