Comparison of a radial artery compression device with invasive radial artery blood pressure monitoring.
ABSTRACT The goal of this study was to validate the accuracy of the Primo radial artery compression device (RACD) according to the guidelines recommended by the American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) SP10-2002 Standards for Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers.
A prospective, nonblind, convenience sample trial at a level 1 trauma center (annual emergency department census 70,000) enrolled 17 adult patients with preexisting radial artery line catheters (RAL). Each patient had 10 blood pressure measurements giving an n=170. This number is consistent with calculations on the basis of the American National Standards Institute/AAMI guidelines.
The mean arterial pressures (MAPs), systolic blood pressures (SBPs), and diastolic blood pressures (DBPs) measured by both the RACD and the RAL were compared. The R for the RAL/RACD were 0.94, 0.96, and 0.85 for MAP, SBP, and DBP, respectively (P<0.05). The mean difference between the RAL MAP and the RACD MAP was +1.0 mmHg (95% confidence interval, -1.69 to -0.33). The mean SBP difference was -2.8 mmHg (SD 6.4 mmHg) and the mean DBP difference was +2.6 mmHg (SD 5.7 mmHg).
The RACD meets the guidelines for automated blood pressure monitors set by the AAMI SP10-2002 Standards for Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers with an accuracy of +/- 5 mmHg and SD of 8 mmHg or less for both SBP and DBP measurements.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Continuous monitoring of arterial blood pressure (ABP) can provide vital information on the cardiovascular system in clinical practice and research. To achieve this, methods have been developed to determine ABP continuously and noninvasively, including the wrist volume clamp method, which uses reflection-mode photoplethysmography (PPG) to indicate the volume change of the radial artery. However, this kind of indication is reportedly not accurate enough, and an in-vivo test for its accuracy is still lacking. Our aim was to fix this gap. As ultrasound can detect the arterial diameter accurately; we have developed a sensor comprised a PPG sensor and an ultrasound transducer, which can collect reflection-mode PPG and A-mode ultrasound signals, simultaneously. Tests on 15 volunteers were conducted under the similar conditions of using wrist volume clamp method for a comparison between the PPG signal and the radial arterial diameter. It was observed that there were obvious differences between the shapes of these two signals, mainly between their drifting trend parts, with the pulsatile components of the signals matching very well. The mean root mean square value of the differences of the trend parts (0.287+/-0.072) was found to be much larger than that of the pulsatile parts (0.107+/-0.028). The results indicated that using PPG signal as a reference for ABP measurement at the wrist region might not be accurate enough, and ultrasound has the potential for replacing it in the wrist volume clamp method for more accurate ABP determination.Blood pressure monitoring 08/2010; 15(4):213-9. · 1.62 Impact Factor