Comparison of a radial artery compression device with invasive radial artery blood pressure monitoring

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Blood Pressure Monitoring (Impact Factor: 1.53). 08/2008; 13(4):199-203. DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3282feebbd
Source: PubMed


The goal of this study was to validate the accuracy of the Primo radial artery compression device (RACD) according to the guidelines recommended by the American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) SP10-2002 Standards for Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers.
A prospective, nonblind, convenience sample trial at a level 1 trauma center (annual emergency department census 70,000) enrolled 17 adult patients with preexisting radial artery line catheters (RAL). Each patient had 10 blood pressure measurements giving an n=170. This number is consistent with calculations on the basis of the American National Standards Institute/AAMI guidelines.
The mean arterial pressures (MAPs), systolic blood pressures (SBPs), and diastolic blood pressures (DBPs) measured by both the RACD and the RAL were compared. The R for the RAL/RACD were 0.94, 0.96, and 0.85 for MAP, SBP, and DBP, respectively (P<0.05). The mean difference between the RAL MAP and the RACD MAP was +1.0 mmHg (95% confidence interval, -1.69 to -0.33). The mean SBP difference was -2.8 mmHg (SD 6.4 mmHg) and the mean DBP difference was +2.6 mmHg (SD 5.7 mmHg).
The RACD meets the guidelines for automated blood pressure monitors set by the AAMI SP10-2002 Standards for Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers with an accuracy of +/- 5 mmHg and SD of 8 mmHg or less for both SBP and DBP measurements.

18 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In developing a wrist blood pressure monitor of high and reliable accuracy, the effect of different pressurization methods on the accuracy of blood pressure measurement at the wrist using oscillometry is investigated in this paper. 30 volunteers are recruited and blood pressure readings are taken with three different methods of pressurizing the wrist. It was found that measurement of mean arterial pressure (MAP) is more accurate when the wrist is locally compressed directly over the radial artery (-2.6 ± 11.4 mmHg) or with a region of surrounding tissue (10.3 ± 6.0 mmHg) than when the whole wrist is compressed by a conventional, constricting cuff (-11.4 ± 16.4 mmHg). Characteristics of accuracy, however, differ between the two local pressurization methods. While a square airbag that compresses the wrist directly over the radial artery may measure the most accurate MAP on average, the range of errors among individuals is large. Contrarily, measurements taken by pressurizing a region over the radial artery with a bladder are least affected by individual variability. In order to measure blood pressure accurately at the wrist while unbiased by the population-based algorithmic compensation to ensure accuracy among different individuals, therefore, the use of local pressurization method may be the most appropriate.
    Conference proceedings: ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference 01/2010; 2010:5744-7. DOI:10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627853
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Continuous monitoring of arterial blood pressure (ABP) can provide vital information on the cardiovascular system in clinical practice and research. To achieve this, methods have been developed to determine ABP continuously and noninvasively, including the wrist volume clamp method, which uses reflection-mode photoplethysmography (PPG) to indicate the volume change of the radial artery. However, this kind of indication is reportedly not accurate enough, and an in-vivo test for its accuracy is still lacking. Our aim was to fix this gap. As ultrasound can detect the arterial diameter accurately; we have developed a sensor comprised a PPG sensor and an ultrasound transducer, which can collect reflection-mode PPG and A-mode ultrasound signals, simultaneously. Tests on 15 volunteers were conducted under the similar conditions of using wrist volume clamp method for a comparison between the PPG signal and the radial arterial diameter. It was observed that there were obvious differences between the shapes of these two signals, mainly between their drifting trend parts, with the pulsatile components of the signals matching very well. The mean root mean square value of the differences of the trend parts (0.287+/-0.072) was found to be much larger than that of the pulsatile parts (0.107+/-0.028). The results indicated that using PPG signal as a reference for ABP measurement at the wrist region might not be accurate enough, and ultrasound has the potential for replacing it in the wrist volume clamp method for more accurate ABP determination.
    Blood pressure monitoring 08/2010; 15(4):213-9. DOI:10.1097/MBP.0b013e328338aada · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Existing standardized protocols for clinical validation of noninvasive blood pressure (BP) monitors do not have specific provisions for monitors that require patient-specific calibration by a secondary method or device before use. This article seeks to identify accuracy requirements and protocol considerations for such monitors. Measurement methods that require patient-specific calibration were reviewed to identify their clinical accuracy requirements. Validation studies of monitors that use these methods were reviewed to identify limitations in their protocols. For a monitor that requires patient-specific calibration, inadequate adaptation of existing protocols can fail to validate the accuracy of the monitor for its intended use. A protocol for such a monitor must have provisions to assess the monitor's accuracy in tracking intrapatient BP changes, from the calibrated level, after a calibration or between calibrations. Performing a patient-specific calibration with a patient at rest and immediately evaluating the monitor against a reference method with the patient also at rest will not assess this accuracy, because changes in BP at rest and over a short time are generally small compared with those that occur over 24 h. For validation purposes, intrapatient BP changes can be achieved by validating the monitor over an extended period or induced by means of physical maneuvers or pharmacological interventions. The secondary method or device used for the calibration must be accurate. The protocol must also have provisions to assess the monitor's ability to correct for changes in hydrostatic pressure, reject or correct for motion artefacts, and correct for other factors that affect measurement accuracy during use. There is a need to establish protocol provisions to ensure that noninvasive BP monitors that require patient-specific calibration are properly validated for their intended use before they are placed on the market or introduced into clinical use.
    Blood Pressure Monitoring 12/2011; 16(6):291–303. DOI:10.1097/MBP.0b013e32834e3c22 · 1.53 Impact Factor