IHE Teaching File and Clinical Trial Export Integration Profile: Functional Examples1

Department of Methodology and Innovation, Roche Palo Alto, 3431 Hillview Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Radiographics (Impact Factor: 2.6). 07/2008; 28(4):933-45. DOI: 10.1148/rg.284075210
Source: PubMed


The digital revolution in radiology introduced the need for electronic export of medical images. However, the current export process is complicated and time consuming. In response to this continued difficulty, the Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) initiative published the Teaching File and Clinical Trial Export (TCE) integration profile. The IHE TCE profile describes a method for using existing standards to simplify the export of key medical images for education, research, and publication. This article reviews the authors' experience in implementing the TCE profile in the following three processes: (a) the retrieval of images for a typical teaching file application within a TCE-compliant picture archiving and communication system (PACS); (b) the export of images, independent of TCE compliance of the PACS, to a typical teaching file application; and (c) the TCE-compliant transfer of images for publication. These examples demonstrate methods with which the TCE profile can be implemented to ease the burden of collecting key medical images from the PACS.

14 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cancer treatment-response assessment is an important clinical and research task that utilizes image-based methods for tracking changes in tumor lesions over time. This article reviews the role of imaging in cancer treatment-response assessment, the limitations of current approaches, and the emerging and future imaging informatics methods to support treatment-response assessment. Imaging informatics methods described include: image repositories for applying and developing response criteria; methods to support the acquisition and storage of image metadata, including ontologies, data standards, image annotation tools and metadata databases; and methods to visualize images and image metadata for treatment decision making. Future directions are discussed, including the development of linked clinical, image and image metadata repositories, and the integration of image metadata into the electronic health record.
    04/2011; 3(2-2):233-246. DOI:10.2217/iim.11.8
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Validation of medical signal and image processing systems requires quality-assured, representative and generally acknowledged databases accompanied by appropriate reference (ground truth) and clinical metadata, which are composed laboriously for each project and are not shared with the scientific community. In our vision, such data will be stored centrally in an open repository. We propose an architecture for a standardized case data and ground truth information repository supporting the evaluation and analysis of computer-aided diagnosis based on (a) the Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) provided by the NASA Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (ISO 14721:2003), (b) the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) Element Set (ISO 15836:2009), (c) the Open Archive Initiative (OAI) Protocol for Metadata Harvesting, and (d) the Image Retrieval in Medical Applications (IRMA) framework. In our implementation, a portal bunches all of the functionalities that are needed for data submission and retrieval. The complete life cycle of the data (define, create, store, sustain, share, use, and improve) is managed. Sophisticated search tools make it easier to use the datasets, which may be merged from different providers. An integrated history record guarantees reproducibility. A standardized creation report is generated with a permanent digital object identifier. This creation report must be referenced by all of the data users. Peer-reviewed e-publishing of these reports will create a reputation for the data contributors and will form de-facto standards regarding image and signal datasets. Good practice guidelines for validation methodology complement the concept of the case repository. This procedure will increase the comparability of evaluation studies for medical signal and image processing methods and applications.
    Journal of Digital Imaging 11/2011; 25(2):213-26. DOI:10.1007/s10278-011-9428-4 · 1.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rationale and objectives: Chest radiographs can be demanding, making this an area of focus during most first-year resident chest rotations. This often comes at a cost of cross-sectional imaging, and new residents are often not initially comfortable with reading chest computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) for pulmonary embolisms (PEs). We created a teaching file of CTAs to improve the detection of PEs. Materials and methods: For initial testing, we used videos of 25 cases, which played for 90 seconds (to allow multiple passes) to residents with and without call experience. The presence and location of PEs and the readers' confidence scores were recorded. After initial testing, first-year residents without call experience were given 20 separate known positive CTA videos to scroll through on their own. The goal of this was to allow for individual review and development of individual search strategies. A second testing was done with all levels of residents with the same initial 25 cases, re-randomized to evaluate for improvement. Results: Initially, first-year residents without call experience identified an average of 14.7 of 18 examinations positive for PEs (versus 15.8 for more senior residents; P < .04). After reviewing the 20 known positive cases, the first-year residents improved, averaging 16.6 (versus 14.7 earlier; P < .01). Conclusions: We created a fast, simple way to expose novice residents to CTA examinations and increase their accuracy in identifying PEs. After using a teaching file, the ability to recognize PEs improved significantly, and scores were no longer significantly different from those of residents with call experience.
    Academic radiology 03/2013; 20(8). DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2012.12.020 · 1.75 Impact Factor
Show more