Performance evaluation of the ADVIA Centaur® anti-HBe and HBeAg assays

Gemeinschaftspraxis fuer Laboratoriumsmedizin, Mikrobiologie und Humangenetik, Dr. Stein & Kollegen, Wallstrasse 10, D41061 Moenchengladbach, Germany.
Journal of Clinical Virology (Impact Factor: 3.02). 10/2008; 43(2):169-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2008.05.008
Source: PubMed


Detection of HBeAg and anti-HBe is valuable for the evaluation and therapeutic management of hepatitis B infection.
To determine the clinical performance of the newly CE-approved(a) HBeAg and anti-HBe assays on the fully automated, random access ADVIA Centaur immunoassay system.
Patient samples collected at two sites were used to compare the ADVIA Centaur assays to Abbott AxSYM assays. Consensus of discordant results was reached using Roche Elecsys assays. Additionally, two well-characterized seroconversion panels were evaluated.
The ADVIA Centaur HBeAg assay sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 99.5%. The ADVIA Centaur anti-HBe assay sensitivity was 100% and the resolved specificity was 98.2%. Fewer samples required retesting with the ADVIA Centaur assays than with the AxSYM. In two well-characterized seroconversion panels, the ADVIA Centaur anti-HBe assay detected anti-HBe 20-25 days earlier than the AxSYM assay; the ADVIA Centaur and AxSYM HBeAg assays detected HBe reactivity on the same day.
The ADVIA Centaur HBeAg and anti-HBe assays demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity, and thus are suitable for clinical use. Their novel algorithms require reduced retesting, suggesting these assays may be more cost effective.

23 Reads
  • Source

    Hot Topics in Viral Hepatitis 01/2009; 5(15):7-13.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim: To review published methods for detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Methods: A thorough search on Medline database was conducted to find original articles describing different methods or techniques of detection of HBV, which are published in English in last 10 years. Articles outlining methods of detection of mutants or drug resistance were excluded. Full texts and abstracts (if full text not available) were reviewed thoroughly. Manual search of references of retrieved articles were also done. We extracted data on different samples and techniques of detection of HBV, their sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp) and applicability. Results: A total of 72 studies were reviewed. HBV was detected from dried blood/plasma spots, hepatocytes, ovarian tissue, cerumen, saliva, parotid tissue, renal tissue, oocytes and embryos, cholangiocarcinoma tissue, etc. Sensitivity of dried blood spot for detecting HBV was > 90% in all the studies. In case of seronegative patients, HBV DNA or serological markers have been detected from hepatocytes or renal tissue in many instances. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and Chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) are most commonly used serological tests for detection. CLIA systems are also used for quantitation. Molecular techniques are used qualitatively as well as for quantitative detection. Among the molecular techniques version 2.0 of the CobasAmpliprep/CobasTaqMan assay and Abbott's real time polymerase chain reaction kit were found to be most sensitive with a lower detection limit of only 6.25 IU/mL and 1.48 IU/mL respectively. Conclusion: Serological and molecular assays are predominant and reliable methods for HBV detection. Automated systems are highly sensitive and quantify HBV DNA and serological markers for monitoring.
    World Journal of Hepatology 10/2015; 7(23):2482-91. DOI:10.4254/wjh.v7.i23.2482