Article

The effect of obesity on clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion.

Kenton D. Leatherman Spine Center, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Spine (Impact Factor: 2.45). 07/2008; 33(16):1789-92. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817b8f6f
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Retrospective cohort analysis.
To investigate and compare back and leg pain, and health-related quality of life measures in obese patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion, and to compare the results to nonobese patients.
Obesity is a growing healthcare crisis in the United States and an increasing number of patients undergoing spinal surgery are obese. Obesity is also associated with low back pain. Some obese patients with significant structural spine problems may be dismissed as having their pain only coming from their weight. We compared patient outcomes in obese and nonobese patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.
We retrospectively reviewed a single-center patient database of patients undergoing lumbar fusion and identified 270 patients with greater than 2-year outcome data. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and patients were classified as obese (BMI >or= 30) or nonobese (BMI < 30). All patients completed Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form (SF)-36 questionnaires, and back and leg pain numerical rating scores before surgery and at 2 years. We compared clinical outcomes and complication rates in the 2 groups.
The overall study group consisted of 109 obese patients and 161 nonobese patients. Both the obese and nonobese patients demonstrated significant improvements in back pain, leg pain, SF-36 physical composite summary (PCS), and ODI scores (P < 0.001) at 2-year follow-up compared with baseline. There was no significant difference in the mean improvements seen in obese patients compared with nonobese patients with respect to back pain, leg pain, or SF-36 PCS or ODI scores. Both SF-36 PCS (P = 0.037) and ODI score (P = 0.028) at 2-year follow-up were better in the nonobese patients compared with the obese patients. Overall complication rates were slightly higher in the obese group (P = 0.045), predominantly because of wound-related complications.
Obese patients undergoing lumbar fusion achieve similar benefits to nonobese patients. Wound-related complications are more common in obese patients. Obese patients with otherwise good indications for lumbar fusion should not be denied this procedure because of their weight.

0 Followers
 · 
153 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study Design. Observational retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected database.Objective. To determine whether overweight body mass index (BMI) influences 30-day outcomes of elective spine surgery.Summary of Background Data. Obesity is prevalent in the United States, but its impact on the outcome of elective spine surgery remains controversial.Methods. We used National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, a prospective clinical database with proven validity and reproducibility consisting of 256 perioperative standardized variables from surgical patients at nearly 400 academic and non-academic hospitals nationwide. We identified 49,314 patients who underwent elective fusion, laminectomy or both between 2006 and 2012. We divided patients according to BMI (kg/m) as normal (18.5-24.9), pre-obese (25.0-29.9), obese I (30.0-34.9), obese II (35.0-39.9) and obese III (≥40). Relationship between increased BMI and outcome of surgery measured as prolonged hospitalization, complications, return to the operating room, discharged with continued care, readmission, death was determined using logistic regression before and after propensity score matching.Results. All overweight patients (BMI≥25 kg/m) showed increased odds of an adverse outcome compared to normal patients in unmatched analyses, with maximal effect seen in obese III group. In the propensity-matched sample, obese III patients continued to show increased odds for complications (Odds Ratio, OR, 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.3), readmission (2.3, 1.1-4.9), and return to the operating room (1.8, 1.1-3.1).Conclusions. Impact of obesity on elective spine surgery outcome is mediated, at least in part, by comorbidities in patients with BMI between 25.0 and 39.9 kg/m. However, BMI itself is an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in morbidly obese patients.
    Spine 05/2014; DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000435 · 2.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Early interspinous process fixation constructs utilize rigid fixation plates with immobile spikes which increase the difficulty of device implantation when anatomic variations are encountered. Second generation systems have been designed with polyaxial properties with the goal of accommodating natural osseous anatomic variations to achieve optimal implant placement and fixation integrity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients treated with this device to supplement the biomechanical data from previous studies. A retrospective, non-randomized, single-center chart review at or beyond the one year postoperative time point was conducted to collect preoperative and perioperative data on patients treated with a polyaxial intraspinous fixation system. A postoperative numerical pain rating scale and modified MacNab classification score were obtained from each patient in the cohort via phone survey. A total of 53 patients were included in the study. Median hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-7 days). There were no reported perioperative blood transfusions or cases of radiographic fracture/migration of the device at the 6 week post-operative time point. There was a significant improvement in pain index score in the overall patient study group and a satisfactory (excellent or good) MacNab result was obtained in 48% of all patients. Patients with preoperative pain scores greater than 8/10 reported more pain improvement than patients with preoperative pain scores less than 5 (0 points, p = 0.96, n = 8). Patients with a BMI less than 30 had significantly better MacNab outcome classifications than patients with a BMI greater than 30. The polyaxial interspinous fusion system produces significant clinical improvement when employed to treat patients with stenosis, herniated disc, or low grade spondylolisthesis. This device can be implanted with a low complication rate and short postoperative hospital admission time. Patients with high pre-operative pain score and BMI under 30 can be predictors of better clinical outcome and should be considered prior to implantation.
    01/2014; 8:1-11. DOI:10.14444/1035
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study Design. Retrospective Case SeriesObjective. The objectives of this study were to 1) determine the rate of POUR in a series of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery 2) compare length of stay between patients who developed POUR and patients who did not, and 3) identify the patient and surgical factors associated with the development of POUR.Summary of Background Data. Although post-operative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication in many surgical subspecialties, sparse literature is present regarding development of POUR after posterior lumbar surgical procedures.Methods. A retrospective review was conducted of all posterior lumbar surgery cases performed at single institute from July 2008 to July 2012. Data collected included demographic variables (age, sex, BMI), length of stay, comorbid medical conditions, and surgical data. Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction was used to compare length of stay between patients who developed POUR and patients who did not. A multivariate logistic regression model was created using all patient and surgical factors and systematically pruned of variables not improving overall predictive power.Results. 647 patients (291 decompression, 356 decompression and fusion) were included in the study. 36 of 647 patients had urinary retention after lumbar spine surgery (5.6%). Patients who developed POUR had a longer length of stay compared to patients who did not develop POUR (3.94 days vs. 2.34 days, p = 0.005). Male gender, BPH, age, diabetes, and depression were significantly associated with development of POUR (OR: 3.05, 9.82, 1.04, 3.32, and 2.51, respectively). Smoking was inversely associated with the development of POUR (OR: 0.45).Conclusions. The risk of developing POUR following posterior lumbar spine surgery is approximately 5%. Male gender, BPH, age, diabetes, and depression were significantly associated with the POUR group. Patients who developed POUR had a greater length of stay.
    Spine 09/2014; 39(24). DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000600 · 2.45 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
1 Download