Gene-environment interactions for complex traits: Definitions, methodological requirements and challenges

Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
European Journal of HumanGenetics (Impact Factor: 4.23). 10/2008; 16(10):1164-72. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.106
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Genetic and environmental risk factors and their interactions contribute to the development of complex diseases. In this review, we discuss methodological issues involved in investigating gene-environment (G x E) interactions in genetic-epidemiological studies of complex diseases and their potential relevance for clinical application. Although there are some important examples of interactions and applications, the widespread use of the knowledge about G x E interaction for targeted intervention or personalized treatment (pharmacogenetics) is still beyond current means. This is due to the fact that convincing evidence and high predictive or discriminative power are necessary conditions for usefulness in clinical practice. We attempt to clarify conceptual differences of the term 'interaction' in the statistical and biological sciences, since precise definitions are important for the interpretation of results. We argue that the investigation of G x E interactions is more rewarding for the detailed characterization of identified disease genes (ie at advanced stages of genetic research) and the stratified analysis of environmental effects by genotype or vice versa. Advantages and disadvantages of different epidemiological study designs are given and sample size requirements are exemplified. These issues as well as a critical appraisal of common methodological concerns are finally discussed.

Download full-text


Available from: André Scherag, Feb 09, 2015
  • Source
    • "Vielmehr ist davon auszugehen, dass menschliches Verhalten durch die Wechselwirkung einer Vielzahl unterschiedlicher Gene beeinflusst wird (Plomin & Crabbe, 2000). Um die mit einzelnen Genen einhergehenden kleinen Effektstärken und insbesondere Interaktionseffekte statistisch ermitteln zu können werden sehr große Stichprobenumfänge benötigt (siehe Dempfle et al., 2008; Luan, Wong, Day & Wareham, 2001). In der psychiatrischen Forschung wird diese Anforderung aufgrund der meist aufwendigen Studiendesigns sowie der teilweise geringen Prävalenzraten psychischer Störungsbilder üblicherweise nicht erfüllt (Duncan & Keller, 2011; vgl. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The prevalence of childhood abuse and maltreatment is estimated to lie at about 15% in the overall German population. Previous research suggested that about one third of all individuals who had experienced childhood adversity subsequently maltreated their own children or responded insensitively to their children's needs. Empirical studies imply that interindividual differences in the responsiveness to childhood adversity can partially be explained by gene-environment interactions. This article discusses the potential interplay of genes and environment in the context of transmitting maltreating behavior and (in)sensitive parenting against the background of current challenges in genetic research. Selected studies on gene × environment interactions are presented and relevant gene polymorphisms are identified. Overall, previous studies reported interactions between polymorphisms of the serotonergic, dopaminergic, oxytocin-related, and arginine vasopressin-related systems and childhood experiences of care and abuse in the prediction of social behaviors during mother-child interactions. The results indicate a differential susceptibility toward both negative and positive environments which is dependent on genetic characteristics. Future research should thus investigate the effects of childrens' presumed risk gene variants toward negative as well as positive parenting. This could contribute to a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the intergenerational transmission of abusive and beneficial parenting behavior and help to avoid false stigmatizations.
    Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie 09/2014; 42(5):349-59. DOI:10.1024/1422-4917/a000310 · 0.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Population structure may confound genetic classifiers as demonstrated in autism (Belgard et al., 2013; Robinson et al., 2013). However, use of unaffected siblings in association studies (instead of independent controls) protects against false positives resulting from population stratification (Dempfle et al., 2008). So, to maintain statistical power, affected, and unaffected individuals from the different families were analyzed as a whole without considering ethnicity, but limiting false positive results coming from population stratification using unaffected siblings as controls. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are highly heritable complex neurodevelopmental disorders with a 4:1 male: female ratio. Common genetic variation could explain 40-60% of the variance in liability to autism. Because of their small effect, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have only identified a small number of individual single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). To increase the power of GWASs in complex disorders, methods like convergent functional genomics (CFG) have emerged to extract true association signals from noise and to identify and prioritize genes from SNPs using a scoring strategy combining statistics and functional genomics. We adapted and applied this approach to analyze data from a GWAS performed on families with multiple children affected with autism from Autism Speaks Autism Genetic Resource Exchange (AGRE). We identified a set of 133 candidate markers that were localized in or close to genes with functional relevance in ASD from a discovery population (545 multiplex families); a gender specific genetic score (GS) based on these common variants explained 1% (P = 0.01 in males) and 5% (P = 8.7 × 10(-7) in females) of genetic variance in an independent sample of multiplex families. Overall, our work demonstrates that prioritization of GWAS data based on functional genomics identified common variants associated with autism and provided additional support for a common polygenic background in autism.
    Frontiers in Genetics 02/2014; 5:33. DOI:10.3389/fgene.2014.00033
  • Source
    • "Measures of social attachment, such as adult attachment style, have been previously associated with polymorphic variation in serotonergic genes, including the T102C polymorphism of serotonin receptor 2A (HTR2A) gene (Gillath et al. 2008) and the serotonin transporter gene (Caspers et al. 2009; Spangler et al. 2009). The recent focus of behavior genetics has shifted from studying genetic main effects to exploring interaction effects between genes and environments (Belsky et al. 2007; Dempfle et al. 2008). It has been argued that genetic variation between individuals manifests itself particularly as individual "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The ability to form and maintain attachment relations with other people is crucial for mental health and well-being. The origins of attachment behaviors are often assumed to be in early experiences with other people, especially with primary caregivers. Preliminary evidence suggests that serotonergic system may be involved in attachment behaviors. We examined whether the T102C variant of the serotonin receptor 2A gene moderates the effect of childhood maternal nurturance on social attachment in adulthood. The participants were 1070 women and men from the Young Finns Study with 27-year follow-up and two measurement times for the outcomes (n = 1836 person observations). Mothers reported their relationship quality with their children (participants) in childhood or adolescence. Social attachment was assessed by participant's self-reports on two measures (reward dependence scale of the Temperament and Character Inventory and the Relationship Questionnaire). High childhood maternal nurturance predicted high reward dependence and low avoidant attachment in carriers of the T/T genotype but not in the T/C or C/C genotype groups, while low maternal nurturance was associated with low reward dependence and high avoidant attachment in T/T genotype carriers but not in C allele carriers. Our result suggests that T/T genotype carriers were more influenced by their childhood nurturing environment, than their C allele carrying counterparts, thus providing evidence for differential susceptibility to childhood nurturing environment associated with the HTR2A gene.
    Genes Brain and Behavior 06/2011; 10(7):702-9. DOI:10.1111/j.1601-183X.2011.00708.x · 3.51 Impact Factor
Show more