Article

Analysis of the Golgi apparatus in Arabidopsis seed coat cells during polarized secretion of pectin-rich mucilage.

Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Z4.
The Plant Cell (Impact Factor: 9.58). 06/2008; 20(6):1623-38. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.108.058842
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Differentiation of the Arabidopsis thaliana seed coat cells includes a secretory phase where large amounts of pectinaceous mucilage are deposited to a specific domain of the cell wall. During this phase, Golgi stacks had cisternae with swollen margins and trans-Golgi networks consisting of interconnected vesicular clusters. The proportion of Golgi stacks producing mucilage was determined by immunogold labeling and transmission electron microscopy using an antimucilage antibody, CCRC-M36. The large percentage of stacks found to contain mucilage supports a model where all Golgi stacks produce mucilage synchronously, rather than having a subset of specialist Golgi producing pectin product. Initiation of mucilage biosynthesis was also correlated with an increase in the number of Golgi stacks per cell. Interestingly, though the morphology of individual Golgi stacks was dependent on the volume of mucilage produced, the number was not, suggesting that proliferation of Golgi stacks is developmentally programmed. Mapping the position of mucilage-producing Golgi stacks within developing seed coat cells and live-cell imaging of cells labeled with a trans-Golgi marker showed that stacks were randomly distributed throughout the cytoplasm rather than clustered at the site of secretion. These data indicate that the destination of cargo has little effect on the location of the Golgi stack within the cell.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: George W Haughn, Jul 06, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
118 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Differentiation of the maternally derived seed coat epidermal cells into mucilage secretory cells (MSCs) is a common adaptation in angiosperms. Recent studies identified cellulose as an important component of seed mucilage in various species. Cellulose is deposited as a set of rays that radiate from the seed upon mucilage extrusion, serving to anchor the pectic component of seed mucilage to the seed surface. Using transcriptome data encompassing the course of seed development, we identified COBRA-LIKE 2 (COBL2), a member of the GPI-anchored COBRA-LIKE gene family, as coexpressed with other genes involved in cellulose deposition in MSCs. Disruption of the COBL2 gene results in substantial reduction in the rays of cellulose present in seed mucilage, along with an increased solubility of the pectic component of the mucilage. Light birefringence demonstrates a substantial decrease in crystalline cellulose deposition into the cellulosic-rays of the cobl2 mutants. Moreover, crystalline cellulose deposition into the radial cell walls and the columella appears substantially compromised as demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy and in-situ quantification of light birefringence. Overall, the cobl2 mutants display about 40% reduction in whole seed crystalline cellulose content compared to wild type. The data establishes that COBL2 plays a role in the deposition of crystalline cellulose into various secondary cell wall structures during seed coat epidermal cell differentiation. Copyright © 2015, American Society of Plant Biologists.
    Plant physiology 01/2015; DOI:10.1104/pp.114.240671 · 7.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Homogalacturonan pectin domains are synthesized in a highly methyl-esterified form that later can be differentially de-methyl esterified by pectin methyl esterase (PME) to strengthening or loosen plant cell walls that contain pectin, including seed coat mucilage, a specialized secondary cell wall of seed coat epidermal cells. As a means to identify the active PMEs in seed coat mucilage we identified 7 PMEs expressed during seed coat development. One of these, HIGHLY METHYL ESTERIFIED SEEDS (HMS), is abundant during mucilage secretion, peaking at 7 Days Post Anthesis (DPA) both in the seed coat and the embryo. We have determined that this gene is required for normal levels of PME activity and homogalacturonan methyl esterification in the seed. The hms-1 mutant displays altered embryo morphology and mucilage extrusion, both of which are a consequence of defects in embryo development. A significant decrease in the size of cells in the embryo suggests that the changes in embryo morphology are a consequence of lack of cell expansion. Progeny from a cross between hms-1 and the previously characterized PMEI5 over-expression line (OE) suggest that HMS acts independently from other cell wall modifying enzymes in the embryo. We propose that HMS is required for cell wall loosening in the embryo to facilitate cell expansion during the accumulation of storage reserves, and that its role in the seed coat is masked by redundancy. Copyright © 2015, American Society of Plant Biologists.
    Plant physiology 01/2015; 167(3). DOI:10.1104/pp.114.255604 · 7.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The secretion of proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates to the cell surface is essential for plant development and adaptation. Secreted substances synthesized at the endoplasmic reticulum pass through the Golgi apparatus and trans-Golgi network (TGN) en route to the plasma membrane via the conventional secretion pathway. The TGN is morphologically and functionally distinct from the Golgi apparatus. The TGN is located at the crossroads of many trafficking pathways and regulates a range of crucial processes including secretion to the cell surface, transport to the vacuole, and the reception of endocytic cargo. This review outlines the TGN's central role in cargo secretion, showing that its behavior is more complex and controlled than the bulk-flow hypothesis suggests. Its formation, structure, and maintenance are discussed along with the formation and release of secretory vesicles.
    Protoplasma 09/2014; 252(2). DOI:10.1007/s00709-014-0693-1 · 3.17 Impact Factor