Targeting primary care referrals to smoking cessation clinics does not improve quit rates: implementing evidence-based interventions into practice.

VA Greater Los Angeles HSR&D Center of Excellence, Sepulveda VA Ambulatory Care Center (152), 16111 Plummer Street, Sepulveda, CA 91343, USA.
Health Services Research (Impact Factor: 2.49). 06/2008; 43(5 Pt 1):1637-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00865.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the impact of a locally adapted evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) approach to implementation of smoking cessation guidelines into routine practice.
We used patient questionnaires, practice surveys, and administrative data in Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care practices across five southwestern states.
In a group-randomized trial of 18 VA facilities, matched on size and academic affiliation, we evaluated intervention practices' abilities to implement evidence-based smoking cessation care following structured evidence review, local priority setting, quality improvement plan development, practice facilitation, expert feedback, and monitoring. Control practices received mailed guidelines and VA audit-feedback reports as usual care.
To represent the population of primary care-based smokers, we randomly sampled and screened 36,445 patients to identify and enroll eligible smokers at baseline (n=1,941) and follow-up at 12 months (n=1,080). We used computer-assisted telephone interviewing to collect smoking behavior, nicotine dependence, readiness to change, health status, and patient sociodemographics. We used practice surveys to measure structure and process changes, and administrative data to assess population utilization patterns.
Intervention practices adopted multifaceted EBQI plans, but had difficulty implementing them, ultimately focusing on smoking cessation clinic referral strategies. While attendance rates increased (p<.0001), we found no intervention effect on smoking cessation.
EBQI stimulated practices to increase smoking cessation clinic referrals and try other less evidence-based interventions that did not translate into improved quit rates at a population level.

  • Source
    Health Services Research 10/2008; 43(5 Pt 1):1457-63. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00903.x · 2.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most primary care patients have at least 1 major behavioral risk: smoking, risky drinking, low physical activity, or unhealthy diet. We studied the effectiveness of a medical assistant-based program to identify and refer patients with risk behaviors to appropriate interventions. We undertook a randomized control trial in a practice-based research network. The trial included 864 adult patients from 6 primary care practices. Medical assistants screened patients for 4 risk behaviors and applied behavior-specific algorithms to link patients with interventions. Primary outcomes were improved risk behaviors on standardized assessments. Secondary outcomes included participation in a behavioral intervention and the program's effect on the medical assistants' workflow and job satisfaction. Follow-up data were available for 55% of participants at a mean of 12 months. The medical assistant referral arm referred a greater proportion of patients than did usual care (67.4 vs 21.8%; P <.001) but did not achieve a higher success rate for improved behavioral outcomes (21.7 vs 16.9%; P=0.19). Qualitative interviews found both individual medical assistant and organizational effects on program adoption. Engaging more primary care team members to address risk behaviors improved referral rates. More extensive medical assistant training, changes in practice culture, and sustained behavioral interventions will be necessary to improve risk behavior outcomes.
    The Annals of Family Medicine 11/2009; 7(6):504-12. DOI:10.1370/afm.1059 · 4.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The formal mission and strategic goals of the Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior (see bottom of this page) guide our activities in the do- mains of research, dissemination, technical assis- tance and training. Our mission and activities are also guided by the strategic priorities and mission of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). VHA's current strategic emphasis is provided by the "Eight for Excellence" framework, comprising eight broad goals and associated strategies and initiatives. This overview article highlights selected Center activities supporting key goals and strategies in the Eight for Excellence initiative. Many of the Eight for Excellence goals emphasize continuous improvement in healthcare quality and safety. For example, Goal 1 broadly addresses continuous improvement in the quality and safety of health care for veterans, while Goal 5 calls for in- creased focus of VHA research and development activities on clinical and system improvements, including increased collaboration between VHA research and health care delivery and increased targeting of VHA health services research and the QUERI model to improve care delivery. These goals entail substantial overlap with our Cen- ter's core mission and activities: our portfolio of projects in research, technical assistance and train- ing are designed to strengthen VHA's ability to improve quality and safety through implementation of evidence-based practices. Center researchers are pursing improvement in tobacco use (Judith Katz-