Readiness for Community-based Bicycle Helmet Use Programs: A Study Using Community-and Individual-level Readiness Models

Colorado Injury Control Research Center, Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, 100 Sage Hall, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1879, USA.
Journal of Health Psychology (Impact Factor: 1.22). 07/2008; 13(5):639-43. DOI: 10.1177/1359105308090935
Source: PubMed


Understanding community context is as important to develop effective community-based injury prevention programs as assessing attitudes and behaviors among individuals. Readiness of a community toward community efforts to promote bicycle helmet use and of individuals to use bicycle helmets were examined in a northern Colorado town in the United States, using a semi-qualitative approach. Community readiness and individual readiness to prevent injuries through use of bicycle helmets differed across groups. The findings provide a better understanding of interactions between community perceptions and individual attitudes and behaviors. Further, target groups for improving bicycle helmet use were identified.

4 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bicycle helmet use from elementary school to high school was examined using retrospective reports collected from 166 students at a university in northern Colorado. Bicycle helmet use in elementary school was a common practice, especially among students born after 1980. However, a rapid decline in bicycle helmet use in junior high school and high school was reported. Students with higher perceived norm of family bicycle helmet use wore helmets more often in junior high school and high school than students with a low family norm. Growing up in the bicycle-friendly community was positively associated with consistent bicycle helmet use.
    Family & community health 04/2009; 32(2):159-66. DOI:10.1097/FCH.0b013e31819947cf · 0.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of the study was to examine associations between bicycle helmet use and attitudes among U.S. college students. Bicycle helmet use was assessed for two different bicycle use purposes: commuting to school and recreation. Student bicycle riders were recruited on the campus of a large public university in Colorado. Questionnaire development was guided by the Theory of Reasoned Action and Health Belief Model. Bicycle use and helmet use for the two purposes, attitudes toward helmet use and bicycle helmet regulations on campus, perceived risk of bicycle-related injury, subjective norms were asked. Bicycle helmet use was defined by current behaviors and intentions for the future, based on the Stages of Change model. A total of 192 questionnaires collected from students who rode bicycles for both commuting and recreation was used for the analysis. Bicycle helmet use differed depending on purposes of bicycle riding: 9.4% of bicycle riders wore bicycle helmets every time for commuting, while 36.5% did so for recreation. Different variables were associated with bicycle helmet use for commuting and recreation in logistic regression models, suggesting that psychosocial structures behind bicycle helmet use behaviors might differ between two bicycle use purposes, commuting and recreation.
    Accident; analysis and prevention 06/2009; 41(3):513-21. DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2009.01.014 · 1.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is growing recognition that different research approaches are necessary to understand the complex interaction between individual and social processes that contribute to risk-taking and injuries. Therefore, qualitative studies have an important role in injury prevention research. This article describes qualitative research in general and outlines some of the ways qualitative research can add to our understanding of injury. It also describes the role, format and methods of interviews (person-to-person and focus groups) commonly performed in qualitative studies, and proposes a novel approach to interviewing that has special relevance and value in injury research with indigenous populations. This methodology adapts focus group methods to be consistent with the goals and procedures of the traditional First Nations communities' Sharing Circles. This adaptation provides a culturally appropriate and sensitive method of developing a deep and broad understanding of indigenous participants' verbal descriptions of their feelings, their experiences and their modes of reasoning. After detailing of this adaptation of the Sharing Circle as a vibrant and vital interview and analysis method, the use of Sharing Circle interview methodology will be illustrated in a study investigating how an Alberta First Nations community experiences and deals with disproportionate levels of injuries arising from impaired driving, outlining important findings uncovered using this novel interviewing method. These findings have been informative to First Nations communities themselves, have informed policy makers provincially and nationally, and have instigated culturally appropriate intervention techniques for Canadian First Nations communities.
    Injury Prevention 10/2009; 15(5):334-40. DOI:10.1136/ip.2008.021261 · 1.89 Impact Factor
Show more