Preperitonal pelvic packing for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: A paradigm shift

University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, United States
The Journal of trauma (Impact Factor: 2.96). 04/2007; 62(4):834-9; discussion 839-42. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31803c7632
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The current management of pelvic fracture patients who are hemodynamically unstable in the United States consists of aggressive resuscitation, mechanical stabilization, and angioembolization. Despite this multidisciplinary approach, our recent analysis confirms an alarming 40% mortality in these high-risk patients. Therefore, we pursued alternate therapies to improve patient outcomes. European trauma groups have suggested the technique of pelvic packing via laparotomy to directly address the venous bleeding that comprises 85% of pelvic fracture hemorrhage. We hypothesized that a modified technique of direct preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) would reduce the need for angiography, decrease blood transfusion requirements, and lower mortality.
Since September 2004, all patients at our ACS-verified level I trauma center with hemodynamic instability and pelvic fractures underwent PPP/external fixation, according to our protocol. Statistics are reported as mean +/- SEM and analyzed using Student's t test.
During the study period, 28 consecutive patients underwent PPP. There was one protocol deviation of prePPP angiography to evaluate an extremity vascular injury. The majority were men (68%) with a mean age of 40 +/- 3.9 years and a mean injury severity score of 55 +/- 3.0. The mean emergency department (ED) systolic blood pressure was 77 +/- 3.0 mm Hg, heart rate was 120 +/- 4.3 bpm, and base deficit 13 +/- 0.8 mmol/L. Pelvic fracture classifications included lateral compression (LC) II (9), anteroposterior compression (APC) III (8), LC I (3), vertical shear (3), LC III (3), and APC II (2). Patients required 4 +/- 1.2 units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) during 82 +/- 13 minutes in the ED. Blood transfusion requirements before postoperative surgical intensive care unit (SICU) admission compared with the subsequent 24 postoperative hours were significantly different (12 +/- 2.0 versus 6 +/- 1.1; p = 0.006). The first 4 patients underwent routine angiography postPPP, with 1 undergoing therapeutic embolization; 4 of the subsequent 24 patients underwent angioembolization with clinical concern of ongoing pelvic hemorrhage. Seven (25%) patients died from multiple organ failure (2), postinjury myocardial infarction/pulseless electrical activity (PEA) arrest (2), invasive mucormycosis (1), withdrawal of care (1), and closed head injury (1); there were no deaths as a result of acute blood loss.
PPP is a rapid method for controlling pelvic fracture-related hemorrhage that can supplant the need for emergent angiography. There is a significant reduction in blood product transfusion after PPP, and this approach appears to reduce mortality in this select high-risk group of patients.

1 Follower
  • Source
    • "External pelvic fixation with the use of C-clamps and belts can be used to control venous haemorrhage [7] [8]. Surgical pelvic packing has also been proposed to control haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures [9] [10]. We have reported the use of intra-aortic balloon occlusion (IABO) in patients with life-threatening haemorrhagic shock after pelvic fracture [11]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The early diagnosis of pelvic arterial haemorrhage is challenging for initiating treatment by transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in multiple trauma patients. We use an institutional algorithm focusing on haemodynamic status on admission and on a whole-body CT scan in stabilized patients to screen patients requiring TAE. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of this approach. This retrospective cohort study included 106 multiple trauma patients admitted to the emergency room with serious pelvic fracture [pelvic abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score of 3 or more]. Of the 106 patients, 27 (25%) underwent pelvic angiography leading to TAE for active arterial haemorrhage in 24. The TAE procedure was successful within 3h of arrival in 18 patients. In accordance with the algorithm, 10 patients were directly admitted to the angiography unit (n=8) and/or operating room (n=2) for uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock on admission. Of the remaining 96 stabilized patients, 20 had contrast media extravasation on pelvic CT scan that prompted pelvic angiography in 16 patients leading to TAE in 14. One patient underwent a pelvic angiography despite showing no contrast media extravasation on pelvic CT scan. All 17 stabilized patients who underwent pelvic angiography presented a more severely compromised haemodynamic status on admission, and they required more blood products during their initial management than the 79 patients who did not undergo pelvic angiography. The incidence of unstable pelvic fractures was however comparable between the two groups. Overall, haemodynamic instability and contrast media extravasation on the CT-scan identified 26 out of the 27 patients who required subsequent pelvic angiography leading to TAE in 24. An algorithm focusing on haemodynamic status on arrival and on the whole-body CT scan in stabilized patients may be effective at triaging multiple trauma patients with serious pelvic fractures.
    Injury 07/2013; 45(1). DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.011 · 2.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Schwere Beckentraumata sind selten und mit einer hohen Mortalität verbunden. Dies stellt die behandelnden Ärzte selbst in Traumazentren vor große Herausforderungen. In der Akutphase steht die Behandlung von Blutungen im Vordergrund. Präklinisch muss die Beckenverletzung zunächst erkannt werden. Stehen andere Verletzungen im Vordergrund, werden sie leicht übersehen. Die Stabilität des Beckenrings muss bei entsprechendem Unfallmechanismus in jedem Fall untersucht werden. Der rasche und zielgerichtete Transport in ein Schwerpunktkrankenhaus unter entsprechender Schockbekämpfung kann lebensrettend sein. In der frühen klinischen Phase helfen abgestimmte Algorithmen, Verzögerungen und Fehler in Diagnostik und Therapie zu vermeiden. Wichtige Elemente der Behandlung stellen eine angemessene Schockbekämpfung, eine externe Stabilisierung des Beckenrings mit Beckengurt, Beckenzwinge oder Fixateur externe sowie eine gezielte Blutstillung entweder interventionell durch intraarterielle Embolisation oder operativ durch Tamponade („pelvic packing“) dar. Severe pelvic injuries are infrequent, but mortality is high. Therefore, even in trauma centers a critical level of experience to successfully manage these patients may not exist. Control of pelvic bleeding is paramount in the acute management. In the prehospital phase, it is essential to be aware of pelvic trauma even in the presence of more obvious concomitant injuries. After high energy trauma a short clinical examination including the assessment of pelvic stability is mandatory. Immediate transport under maximum shock therapy to a trauma center experienced in the management of severe pelvic trauma may save the patients life. Clinical management should be performed according to algorithms in order to avoid mistakes and delays. This includes adequate shock therapy, external stabilization of the pelvic ring (external fixation, C-clamp, pelvic sheet) and hemostasis either interventionally by arterial embolization or surgically by pelvic packing.
    Notfall 10/2008; 11(6):393-398. DOI:10.1007/s10049-008-1086-9 · 0.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: La pathologie traumatique ne cesse de croître du fait de l’augmentation de la pratique du sport de loisir. Elle représente actuellement la première cause de mortalité entre 25 et 40 ans. La prise en charge des hémorragies liées à ces traumatismes est de moins en moins chirurgicale et de plus en plus radiologique. Ceci est particulièrement bien illustré en pathologie pelvienne où l’embolisation est devenue le traitement de première intention des syndromes hémorragiques. Ces syndromes hémorragiques surviennent dans environ 2–10% des traumatismes du pelvis (1–5). Ils engagent le pronostic vital du patient. La mortalité des traumatismes non hémorragiques du pelvis est de 3–10% mais s’élève à 37–42% lorsque ce traumatisme est compliqué d’une hémorragie (5–7). À l’heure actuelle, seule une prise en charge multidisciplinaire, rapide, rigoureuse permet de diminuer cette mortalité. La place de l’embolisation dans cette prise en charge est capitale, nécessitant une équipe de radiologie interventionnelle entrainée, disponible 24 heures sur 24.
Show more