Article

European citizens' use of E-health services: A study of seven countries

Norwegian Centre for Telemedicine, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
BMC Public Health (Impact Factor: 2.32). 04/2007; 7:53. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-53
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT European citizens are increasingly being offered Internet health services. This study investigated patterns of health-related Internet use, its consequences, and citizens' expectations about their doctors' provision of e-health services.
Representative samples were obtained from the general populations in Norway, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Poland, Portugal and Latvia. The total sample consisted of 7934 respondents. Interviews were conducted by telephone.
44 % of the total sample, 71 % of the Internet users, had used the Internet for health purposes. Factors that positively affected the use of Internet for health purposes were youth, higher education, white-collar or no paid job, visits to the GP during the past year, long-term illness or disabilities, and a subjective assessment of one's own health as good. Women were the most active health users among those who were online. One in four of the respondents used the Internet to prepare for or follow up doctors' appointments. Feeling reassured after using the Internet for health purposes was twice as common as experiencing anxieties. When choosing a new doctor, more than a third of the sample rated the provision of e-health services as important.
The users of Internet health services differ from the general population when it comes to health and demographic variables. The most common way to use the Internet in health matters is to read information, second comes using the net to decide whether to see a doctor and to prepare for and follow up on doctors' appointments. Hence, health-related use of the Internet does affect patients' use of other health services, but it would appear to supplement rather than to replace other health services.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Maria Bujnowska-Fedak, Jun 17, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
141 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the field of health communication, a particularly critical issue is communication to the public of environmental risks, especially on topics for which there is still a high degree of scientific uncertainty regarding risk estimates. One such topic is undoubtedly the impact of waste on people's health. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence and characteristics of Italian websites dealing with the topic of waste and health. The keywords 'waste' and 'health' were entered in 2010 in the three most commonly used search engines, and the first five pages were analysed. The selected websites were coded according to the content analysis method. For websites of interest we evaluated the 'page rank'. Out of the 150 occurrences analysed, the number of websites found to deal with this subject was only 19, four of which were of an institutional nature. The majority of websites gave a message of increased health risk associated with the three kinds of waste disposal tackled. As regards visibility, only one of the four institutional websites maintained its position on the first page of the three search engines. We found that institutional health websites have low visibility, despite extensive media coverage of waste and health issues in Italy as a result of the Naples case, which was debated globally. This indicates that public health institutions' web strategies are basically unable to meet people's health information requirements, which could strengthen rival health information providers.
    Environmental Research Letters 11/2011; 6(4):044019. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044019 · 4.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Internet is a convenient source of information about science-based topics (e.g., health matters). Whereas experts are familiar with the conventions of “true” scientific discourse and the assessment of scientific information, laypeople may have great difficulty choosing among, evaluating, and deciding on the vast amount of information available online on the basis of their fragmentary understanding of science. The evaluation of science-based text information may require an (at least rudimentary) understanding of the norms of scientific discourse. Two studies investigated whether laypeople have an adequate grasp of what makes a text scientific and whether their perceptions of text “scientificness” contribute to their evaluation of the credibility of online text information. Furthermore, we investigated whether laypeople distinguish between their own judgments of science-based information and those they expect experts to make, indicating a divergence between their understanding of “official science” and their personal beliefs. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed96:187–211, 2012
    Science Education 03/2012; 96(2):197-201. DOI:10.1002/sce.20480 · 2.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cette étude sur l’utilisation d’Internet pour s’informer en matière de santé est la première recherche publique conduite en France. Elle a été relayée par 13 sites partenaires et par mail et plus de 4 500 personnes y ont participé. Le questionnaire était long, mais très riche en informations sur la situation sociale des personnes, leur accès à Internet, leur utilisation d’Internet pour s’informer en matière de santé, leur état de santé, les croyances et perceptions de santé ainsi que leur recours aux soins. cette étude porte sur un échantillon de convenance non aléatoire : la généralisation de ces résultats à l’ensemble des internautes français ou des internautes santé en France ne peut se faire sans précautions particulières. Cette étude permet néanmoins de dégager des points importants et des hypothèses intéressantes pour mieux comprendre l’impact d’Internet en termes de santé publique, sur les relations entre patients et médecins, la façon de se soigner ou de percevoir le système de soins de manière plus générale.