Brucella canis Isolates from Canadian Dogs.
ABSTRACT Eleven Brucella canis isolates from Canadian dogs were characterized by dye and antibiotic sensitivity, phage susceptibility, urease and H(2)S production, CO(2) requirement, and reaction with monospecific A,M, and R anti-Brucella antiserum. The isolates could be separated into two distinct groups. One group had a sensitivity pattern similar to that seen with the American type strain RM666, while the other group had a pattern identical to that of a Mexican strain, Mex 51. Epidemiological studies supported contraction of infections in the United States and Mexico respectively. The characteristics of all isolates were stable after repeated subculture indicating that strain differences could serve as useful epidemiological markers and supporting division of the species into two biovars.
- SourceAvailable from: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Canine brucellosis is rare in Canada. This report describes an outbreak of Brucella canis infection within a kennel, emphasizing diagnostic and pathologic findings. Gender differences are described. The progestational, nongravid uterus, female spleen, and prostate gland are consistent sites of bacterial isolation.The Canadian veterinary journal. La revue veterinaire canadienne 08/2008; 49(7):703-8. · 0.77 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Key words: Assay Brucella canis Epidemiology Immunochromatography Iran This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of Brucella canis antibodies in different breeds, sex and ages of dogs in southern of Iran. A total of 113 whole blood samples were taken from different breeds based on exotic or native sources. The samples were examined with immunochromatography assay for detection of B. canis antibodies. Twelve dogs were serologically positive (10.62%). There was significant differences in ratio of infected dogs between breeds (exotic or native), ages (less, equal or more than 2 years old) and the history of vaccination (against rabies, leptospirosis, parvovirus, adenovirus type 2, canine distemper, parainfluenza) (P<0.001). However, the results were not significant statistically, among both sex (P=0.058) and the history of clinical signs (P=0.456) in seropositive dogs. Based on this study and the other investigation in companion dogs from southwest of Iran, it seems that the mixed and spray (native) breeds are not infected with B. canis, yet. Conversely, the exotic breeds would be the source of bacterium in Iran. Therefore, preventive and control measures are strongly recommended. ©2011 PVJ. All rights reserved To Cite This Article: Behzadi MA and A Mogheiseh, 2011. Epidemiological survey of Brucella canis infection in different breeds of dogs in Fars province, Iran. Pak Vet J, 32(2): 234-236.Pakistan Veterinary Journal 04/2011; · 1.37 Impact Factor
- Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 01/2004; 35. · 0.76 Impact Factor
Brucella canis Isolates from Canadian Dogs
Lorry B. Forbes and James F. Pantekoek
Eleven Brucella canis isolates from Canadian dogs
were characterized by dye and antibiotic sensitivity,
CO2 requirement, and reaction with monospecific
A,M, and R anti-Brucella antiserum. The isolates
could be separated into two distinct groups. One group
had a sensitivity pattern similar to that seen with the
American type strain RM666, while the other group
had a pattern identical to that of a Mexican strain,
Mex 51. Epidemiological studies supported contrac-
tion of infections in the United States and Mexico
respectively. The characteristics of all isolates were
stable after repeated subculture indicating that strain
differences could serve
markers and supporting division of the species into two
urease and H2S production,
as useful epidemiological
Souches de Brucella canis, isoles chez des
chiens du Canada
Les auteurs ont determine les caracteristiques de
11 souches de Brucella canis, isolees chez des chiens
du Canada. Ils utiliserent a cette fin la sensibilite aux
colorants et aux antibiotiques, la susceptibilite aux
bacteriophages, la production d'urease et de H2S, les
besoins en CO2 et la reaction avec les antiserums
monospecifiques A, M et R contre Brucella.
reussirent a separer les isolats en deux
distincts. Le premier afficha un profil de sensibilite
semblable a celui de la souche RM666 du type ameri-
cain; quant au second, son profil de sensibilite s'appa-
rentait a celui de la souche mexicaine Mex 51. Une
etude epizootiologique permit de conclure que la con-
tamination se fit respectivement aux Etats-Unis et au
Mexique. Les caracteristiques de tous les isolats
cessives, indice que les differences entre les souches
pourraient servir de marqueurs epizootiologiques utiles
et qu'il convient de diviser l'espece en deux biotypes.
apres plusieurs cultures
Can Vet J 1988; 29: 149-152
116 Veterinary Road, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 2R3
(Forbes) and Reference Laboratories Branch, Animal Health
Division, Alberta Agriculture, 6909-116 Street, Edmonton,
Alberta T6H 4P2
Dr. Pantekoek: Animal Pathology Division, Halldon House,
2255 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario KIA 0Y9.
Brucella canis infection in the dog is often asymp-
tomatic. Clinical signs, when they occur, may be
limited to a generalized peripheral lymphadenopathy
with or without infertility. In the female, abortion
usually occurs late in gestation and is characterized by
fetal autolysis and a dark colored vaginal discharge
lasting from one to six weeks. Some bitches may whelp
stillborn or weak pups. Surviving pups have a gener-
alized lymphadenopathy and can carry infection to
maturity. The infected bitch continues to have normal
estrous cycles. Mature male dogs may develop orchitis
and epididymitis resulting in testicular enlargement.
In chronic infections, unilateral or bilateral testicular
atrophy is a more common sequel. Semen abnormali-
ties are evident by five weeks postinfection. Scrotal
enlargement due to the accumulation of fluid in the
tissues and scrotal dermatitis from licking and secon-
dary infection may occur. Less frequently observed
clinical aspects in the dog include discospondylitis,
multifocal pyogranulomatous dermatitis, and ocular
conditions such as corneal edema and endophthalmitis.
A comprehensive review of the clinical and epide-
miological aspects of canine brucellosis is available (1).
A variety of slide agglutination, tube agglutination,
and agar gel immunodiffusion tests have been described
for the diagnosis of B. canis in dogs (2,3,4,5,6).
Almost all have low specificity with false positive rates
ranging from about 10% to almost 60%. Recently
developed agar gel immunodiffusion procedures using
cytoplasmic protein antigens show improved sensitiv-
ity and specificity, and may lead to more reliable
routine tests. However, at present, the commonly used
serological tests for B. canis should be interpreted with
The definitive diagnostic procedure for canine
brucellosis is the isolation of B. canis. Tissues for
culture include blood, lymph nodes, spleen, liver,
kidney, bone marrow, testicular tissue, semen, urine,
vaginal discharges, milk, placenta, uterus, and aborted
fetuses. Hemoculture, though not always successful,
can be useful as the bacteremic phase in untreated dogs
may persist for up to five years (2).
The first reported isolates of B. canis were made
from Beagles in the northeastern United States in 1966
(7). The disease is now generally accepted as having
worldwide distribution (1). In Canada, clinical and
serological evidence indicates that B. canis occurs
sporadically or exists at very low levels (8,9,10). This
paper is, to our knowledge, the first published report
Can Vet J Volume 29, February 1988
Can Vet J Volume 29, February1988
of B. canis in Canadian dogs based on actual recovery
of the organism. We describe the characteristics of
eleven isolates of B. canis (from western Canada in
1982 and 1983) compared with the type strain RM666
and with Mex 51, a strain originating in Mexico.
Materials and Methods
Suspected field isolates of B. canis were
submitted for confirmation to the Animal Pathology
Laboratory, Agriculture Canada, in Saskatoon by the
Reference Laboratories Branch, Animal Health Divi-
BA28A, B and C, and isolates BA49B,C,E,F and G
originated from the same kennel and were received in
March of 1982. They came from five Poodles show-
ing clinical or serological evidence of B. canis infec-
tion. The organism was recovered at necropsy from
uterus, vagina, and pooled samples of spleen. Isolates
CII-T2, C12-T5 and C1I3-T4 were received in April
and May of 1983. They were from a seven-year-old
retriever with weight loss, lethargy, and
unilateral testicular swelling. The organism was ini-
tially recovered from urine and
kidney and pooled liver and spleen. All eleven isolates
in this study were obtained using routine bacteriological
procedures. Tissues were seared and sterile scissors
removed using either a sterile glass rod or a sterile
swab. Tissue inoculum and urine-soaked swabs were
streaked directly onto blood agar (5'Vo sheep's blood
in a trypticase soy agar base) and MacConkey agar,
both incubated aerobically at 350C, and blood agar
and chocolate agar, both incubated in
350C. Colonies were evident at two to three days under
CO2 and three to four days aerobically on both blood
Iowa. Strain Mex 51 was obtained from Dr. C. Rigby,
Animal Diseases Research Institute, Nepean, Ontario.
All eleven isolates were identified
as Brucella sp. by Gram's stain, lack of hemolysis,
nonfermentation of lactose, production of catalase,
and agglutination with antirough Brucella antiserum.
The isolates were then examined using accepted pro-
cedures (1 1) as well as an extended range of dye and
antibiotic concentrations, additional phage types and
sensitivity tests. Tests performed were as
follows: CO2 requirement; H2S production;
production; growth in the presence of thionin or basic
1:200,000), thionin blue (1:500,000 and
penicillin (1, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 U/mL); meso-
and 2 mg/mL);
Firenze (Fi), S708, Weybridge (WVb), Berkeley2 (BK2),
rough (R), rough ovis (R/O), and rough canis (R/G)
Brucella A, M and R antisera.
lysis by Tbilisi (Tb),
Quality control consisted of monitoring
media, antisera, phages and incubator conditions using
the following cultures: B. abortus biovar 1, strain 544;
B. abortus biovar 2, strain 86/8/59; B. abortus biovar
4, strain 292; B. abortus strain 19; B. suis biovar 1,
strain 1330; B. suis biovar 4, strain 40; B. ovis strain
63/290; B. canis strain RM/666.
The submitted isolates did not require C02, produced
trace amounts of H2S, hydrolysed urea in 15 minutes,
grew in the presence of meso-erythritol and reacted
with anti-Brucella R antiserum but
Brucella A or M antisera on the tube agglutinationtest.
The results of the dye and antibiotic tests are sum-
marized in Table 1. All eight isolates from the Poodles
Can Vot J Volumo 29, Fobruary 19.t5
Can Vet J Volume 29, February1988
() +++--+ ()++
had the same growth characteristics on dye and anti-
biotic media. They did not grow on either thionin or
basic fuchsin at a concentration of 1:25,000, and grew
poorly at 1:50,000. On thionin blue, there was reduced
growth at 1:1,000,000 and total inhibition at 1:500,000.
Similarly, on safranin-O, reduced growth was observed
at 1: 10,000 and total inhibition at 1:5,000. There was
reduced growth on penicillin plates at 2.5 U/mL, and
total inhibition at 5 U/mL. The type strain, RM666,
gave almost identical results. The control strain
Mex 51 and the other three isolates (Labrador retriever)
grew in the presence of all dye concentrations tested,
as well as on penicillin plates at concentrations of
10 U/mL. Reduced growth on higher concentrations
of penicillin was also observed with these strains. On
the basis of dye and antibiotic sensitivity tests,
Mex 51 and these three isolates appeared identical and
formed a group distinctly different from that seen with
RM666 and the other eight isolates.
Phages Tb [Routine Test Dilution (RTD) and
104RTD], Fi(RTD and 104RTD), S708(RTD),
Wb(RTD), and BK2(RTD) did not lyse any of the
isolates. Rough canis (RTD and 104RTD) lysed all
isolates. Phages R and R/O occasionally had a weak
lytic effect at 104 RTD but not at RTD. This
phenomenon was observed with all isolates except
The most frequently described strains of B. canis
resemble RM666, the type strain for the species. Char-
acteristics of this strain include resistance to thionin
(1:25,000) but sensitivity to basic fuchsin (1:50,000),
safranin-O (1:5,000), thionine blue (1:500,000), and
penicillin (5 U/mL) (11,12). Recently, several strains
of B. canis have been described that grow in the
presence of basic fuchsin (1:25,000) (13,14). A number
of these strains, including Mex 51, originated in
Mexico. Our examination of Mex 51 in parallel with
RM666 showed that Mex 51 consistently grew on con-
centrations of basic fuchsin, safranin-O, thionin blue,
and penicillin that were inhibitory to RM666. Without
exception, dye and antibiotic results for the Canadian
field isolates matched those of either RM666 or
Mex 51. The eight isolates from the kennel exhibited
the same characteristics as RM666 while the isolates
from the Labrador retriever were indistinguishable
from Mex 51.
The properties of RM666, Mex 51, and all field
strains remained unchanged after seven to ten sub-
cultures under laboratory conditions and storage at
-70°C in litmus milk. This stability indicates that
strain differences might be useful epidemiological
markers. Histories available with these 11 isolates
support this concept. Poodles from the kennel had
extensive contact with dogs from the United States,
where typical (RM666) strains are predominant. The
Labrador retriever spent approximately 4.5 months in
Mexico and the southwestern United States prior to
his return to Canada and the development of canine
Brucella canis is usually classified as H25 negative
(12,15). It will, however, slowly produce H25 after
several days of growth (16). In our system RM666,
Mex 51 and all field strains produced trace amounts
of H2S after five days.
The smooth phages Tb, Fi, S708, Wb, and BK2 did
not lyse any of the B. canis isolates, while R/C (RTD
and 104RTD) lysed all of them. These results are
expected for this group of phages. The frequency of
occurrence of the weak lytic effect produced by
R/0(104RTD) was twice that of R(104RTD). Varia-
tions in the specificity of the rough phages, particularly
the R/O group, are known to occur and may be
reflected in these observations (13).
All field and control strains of B. canis described
here grew on serum-dextrose-tryptose agar with added
meso-erythritol at 1 and 2 mg/mL. Brucellae that are
inhibited by erythritol can be detected on this medium
but actual erythritol utilization is difficult to assess.
The growth of RM666 in trypticase soy broth was not
enhanced by the addition of erythritol and it was con-
cluded that RM666 does not utilize this substrate (12).
Recent oxidative-metabolic studies have determined
that Mexican isolates can utilize erythritol and con-
firmed that RM666 cannot, leading to the conclusion
that differences in erythritol utilization and basic
fuchsin sensitivity are sufficient to warrant division of
the species into two biovars (14). The results obtained
here support this suggestion.
We wish to thank the following employees of the
Agriculture Canada, Animal Pathology Laboratory in
Saskatoon: Angie Chudy and Carla Berry for their
work in biotyping; Irene Bubyn for competent and
timely word processing and Dr. W.D.G. (Bill) Yates
for editorial comments. We also wish to thank
Dr. Charlotte Rigby, Animal Diseases Research Insti-
tute, Nepean for her constructive critique of this work
and Cindy Jenkins, Alberta Veterinary Laboratory,
for information on
1. Greene CE, George LW. Canine brucellosis. In: Clinical
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat.
Philadelphia: Saunders, 1984: 646-662.
2. Carmichael LE, Zoha SJ, Flores-Castro R. Problems in the
serodiagnosis of canine brucellosis: Dog responses to cell wall
and internal antigens of Brucella canis. 3rd International
Symposium on Brucellosis, Algiers, Algeria, 1983; Develop Biol
Standard; Basel: S. Karger, 1984; 56: 371-383.
3. Brown J, Blue JL, Wooley RE, Dreesen DW, Carmichael LE.
A serologic survey of a population of Georgia dogs for Brucella
canis and an evaluation of the slide agglutination test. J Am
Vet Med Assoc 1976; 169: 1214-1216.
4. Badakhsh FF, Carmichael LE, Douglass JA. Improved rapid
slide agglutination test for presumptive diagnosis of canine
brucellosis. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 15: 286-269.
5. Zoha SJ, Carmichael LE. Serological responses of dogs to cell
wall and internal antigens of Brucella canis. Vet Microbiol 1982;
6. Carmichael LE, Joubert JC. A rapid slide agglutination test
for the serodiagnosis of Brucella canis infection that employs
a variant (M-) organism as antigen. Cornell Vet 1987; 77: 3-12.
7. Carmichael LE. Abortions in 200 beagles. J Am Vet Med Assoc
1966; 149: 1126.
Can Vet J Volume 29, February 1988
8. Higgins R, Hoquet F, Bourque R, Gosselin Y. A serological
survey for Brucella canis in dogs in the province of Quebec.
Can Vet J 1979; 20: 315-317.
9. Bosu WTK, Prescott JF. A serological survey of dogs for
Brucella canis in southwestern Ontario. Can Vet J 1980;
10. Anderson GI, Binnington AG. Discospondylitis and orchitis
associated with high Brucella titre in a dog. Can Vet J 1983;
11. Alton GG, Jones LM, Pietz DE. Laboratory techniques in
brucellosis. 2nd ed. World Health Organization Monograph
Series No. 55; 1975.
12. Jones LM, Zanardi M, Leong D, Wilson JB. Taxonomic posi-
tion in the genus Brucella of the causative agent of canine abor-
tion. J Bacteriol 1968; 95: 625-630.
13. Corbel MJ, Thomas EL. Use of phage for the identification
of Brucella canis and Brucella ovis cultures. Res Vet Sci 1985;
14. Flores-Castro R, Carmichael LE. Characterization of different
15. Meyer ME. Brucella organisms isolated from dogs: Comparison
of characteristics of members of the genus Brucella. Am J Vet
Res 1969; 30: 1751-1754.
16. Carmichael LE, Bruner DW. Characteristics of a newly
recognized species of Brucella responsible for infectious canine
abortions. Cornell Vet 1968; 58: 579-592.
Can Vet J Volume 29, February 1988