Social concepts are represented in the superior anterior temporal cortex

National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Cognitive Neuroscience Section, Bethesda, MD 20892-1440, USA.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.67). 04/2007; 104(15):6430-5. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0607061104
Source: PubMed


Social concepts such as "tactless" or "honorable" enable us to describe our own as well as others' social behaviors. The prevailing view is that this abstract social semantic knowledge is mainly subserved by the same medial prefrontal regions that are considered essential for mental state attribution and self-reflection. Nevertheless, neurodegeneration of the anterior temporal cortex typically leads to impairments of social behavior as well as general conceptual knowledge. By using functional MRI, we demonstrate that the anterior temporal lobe represents abstract social semantic knowledge in agreement with this patient evidence. The bilateral superior anterior temporal lobes (Brodmann's area 38) are selectively activated when participants judge the meaning relatedness of social concepts (e.g., honor-brave) as compared with concepts describing general animal functions (e.g., nutritious-useful). Remarkably, only activity in the superior anterior temporal cortex, but not the medial prefrontal cortex, correlates with the richness of detail with which social concepts describe social behavior. Furthermore, this anterior temporal lobe activation is independent of emotional valence, whereas medial prefrontal regions show enhanced activation for positive social concepts. Our results demonstrate that the superior anterior temporal cortex plays a key role in social cognition by providing abstract conceptual knowledge of social behaviors. We further speculate that these abstract conceptual representations can be associated with different contexts of social actions and emotions through integration with frontolimbic circuits to enable flexible evaluations of social behavior.

Download full-text


Available from: Frank Krueger,
  • Source
    • "There is growing evidence that cognition plays a key role in social networks. Research using both human and animal models has shown that brain structure is associated with network size and structure (Barton, 1996; Bickart et al., 2011; Dunbar, 1992, 1993, 1995; Goncalves et al., 2011; Kudo and Dunbar, 2001; Meyer et al., 2012; Sallet et al., 2011; Stiller and Dunbar, 2007; Zahn et al., 2007). Likewise, human social networks have been shown to resemble those of many non-human species, further confirming the roots of human sociability in our biological endowments (Faust and Skvoretz, 2002; Skvoretz and Faust, 2002). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: How does an individual's sex influence their recall of social relations? Extensive research has shown that social networks differ by sex and has attempted to explain these differences either through structural availability or individual preferences. Addressing the limitations of these explanations, we build on an increasing body of research emphasizing the role of cognition in the formation and maintenance of networks to argue that males and females may exhibit different strategies for encoding and recalling social information in memory. Further, because activating sex roles can alter cognitive performance, we propose that differences in recall may only or primarily appear when respondents are made aware of their sex. We explore differences in male and female network memory using a laboratory experiment asking respondents to memorize and recall a novel social network after receiving either a sex prime or a control prime. We find that sex significantly impacts social network recall, however being made aware of one's sex does not. Our results provide evidence that differences in male and female networks may be partly due to sex-based differences in network cognition.
    Social Networks 08/2016; 44:74-84. DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2015.06.002 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "To identify brain regions that were activated both at the onsets of stimulation trains and during the sustained phase of stimulation trains, a conjunction analysis was performed on the group-level statistical volumes, using the activation to the onsets of stimulation trains as inclusive mask [Zahn et al., 2007]. The cortical regions that were commonly activated by the onsets and the sustained phases of stimulation trains were extracted by multiplying the inclusive mask with the activated maps to the sustained phase of stimulation trains. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transient nociceptive stimuli elicit consistent brain responses in the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices (S1, S2), the insula and the anterior and mid-cingulate cortex (ACC/MCC). However, the functional significance of these responses, especially their relationship with sustained pain perception, remains largely unknown. Here, using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we characterize the differential involvement of these brain regions in the processing of sustained nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory input. By comparing the spatial patterns of activity elicited by transient (0.5 ms) and long-lasting (15 and 30 s) stimuli selectively activating nociceptive or non-nociceptive afferents, we found that the contralateral S1 responded more strongly to the onset of non-nociceptive stimulation as compared to the onset of nociceptive stimulation and the sustained phases of nociceptive and non-nociceptive stimulation. Similarly, the anterior insula responded more strongly to the onset of nociceptive stimulation as compared to the onset of non-nociceptive stimulation and the sustained phases of nociceptive and non-nociceptive stimulation. This suggests that S1 is specifically sensitive to changes in incoming non-nociceptive input, whereas the anterior insula is specifically sensitive to changes in incoming nociceptive input. Second, we found that the MCC responded more strongly to the onsets as compared to the sustained phases of both nociceptive and non-nociceptive stimulation, suggesting that it could be involved in the detection of change regardless of sensory modality. Finally, the posterior insula and S2 responded maximally during the sustained phase of non-nociceptive stimulation but not nociceptive stimulation, suggesting that these regions are preferentially involved in processing non-nociceptive somatosensory input. Hum Brain Mapp, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Human Brain Mapping 08/2015; DOI:10.1002/hbm.22922 · 5.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "wed that insula , amygdala and striatum are part of a network processing aversive stimuli . Interestingly the same set of areas ( insula , amygdala and putamen ) and lIFG have been associated to implicit emotion processing ( Critchley et al . , 2000 ) . Finally , lIFG was found to be activated in studies contrasting social versus animal concepts ( Zahn et al . , 2007 ) and person versus object knowledge ( Contreras et al . , 2011 ) , and might play a role in processing conspecifics . It is plausible that social knowledge includes also an evalua - tive component ( also referred in literature as prejudice ) , in addition to a classical semantic component ( see , Carnaghi , Silveri , and Rumiati , in p"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A person can be appraised as an individual or as a member of a social group. In the present study we tested whether the knowledge about social groups is represented independently of the living and non-living things. Patients with frontal and temporal lobe tumors involving either the left or the right hemisphere performed three tasks - picture naming, word-to-picture matching and picture sorting - tapping the lexical semantic knowledge of living things, non-living things and social groups. Both behavioral and voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) analyses suggested that social groups might be represented differently from other categories. VLSM analysis carried out on naming errors revealed that left-lateralized lesions in the inferior frontal gyrus, amygdala, insula and basal ganglia were associated with the lexical-semantic processing of social groups. These findings indicate that the social group representation may rely on areas associated with affective processing. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Cortex 07/2015; 70. DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.06.024 · 5.13 Impact Factor
Show more