Article

The risk of cross-infection when marking surgical patients prior to surgery - review of two types of marking pens.

Department of Orthopaedics, Leighton Hospital, Crewe, Cheshire, UK.
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England (Impact Factor: 1.33). 04/2007; 89(3):226-8. DOI: 10.1308/003588407X168406
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Two types of marker pens were compared to find whether they produced different risks of infection transmission over different time intervals.
Twenty-four patients were marked according to the type of surgery: each had a set of new dry white-board marker (DWM) and a permanent marker (PM) pen. Once used, their tips were used to inoculate blood agar plates at different time intervals.
At 0 min, 96% of the DWM pens and 29% of the PM pens were positive of growth. At 3 and 10 min, all of the DWM pens remained positive. The rate dropped to 16.67% in 3 min down to none at 10 min for the PM pens.
DWM pens carry a significant risk of transmitting infection between patients. It is recommended that they are not used in marking. PM pens should not be used between patients in less than a 10-min interval.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
61 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background For many surgical procedures skin marking is required well before surgery and induction of anesthesia. In some cases, the patient may need to be standing or sitting while the skin area is marked. Marking of perforators and varicosities in chronic venous diseases, marking of stoma sites for urinary or fecal diversions are some examples. The side of surgery should ideally be marked preoperatively to avoid wrong side surgery. Marks made with conventional marking pens fade or disappear with preoperative skin preparation, whereas marks made with henna paste, which is orange to dark brown in color, last for up to 3 weeks in spite of regular showers and skin cleansing, even with ethanol. This property of henna encouraged us to use it as a preoperative skin marker. Methods Henna paste was used as a preoperative skin marker in 250 patients. In 154 patients with chronic venous diseases, perforators and varicosities were marked during duplex scanning. Henna was used to mark the colostomy site in 28 patients with carcinoma of the rectum prior to abdominoperineal resection of the rectum (APR) (four of them laparoscopic APR) and the aspiration site in 11 patients with liver abscesses and 4 patients with pleural empyemas, under ultrasonographic (USG) guidance. In addition, henna was used to mark the correct side of surgery in 47 patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia surgery. Marking was done from 1 to 8 days before surgery. Results The marking with henna was clearly visible in all the cases even after preoperative skin preparation with ethanol up to 8 days after application. There were no complications associated with the marking. All marks disappeared 4 weeks after application. In terms of successful execution of the desired procedure, the use of henna marking was successful in all the cases. Conclusions Henna is an ideal substance for use as a preoperative skin marker. It can be safely and effectively used as a marker for varicose vein surgery, ultrasound-guided identification of lesions, establishing the ideal site for stomas on the abdominal wall, and to identify the correct side of surgery. Markings made with henna are durable and do not fade with routine bathing or preoperative skin preparation. In most cases there are no associated complications. Henna is cheap, safe, and convenient, and indications for its use can be ubiquitous.
    World Journal of Surgery 02/2011; 35(2):316-7. · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For many surgical procedures skin marking is required well before surgery and induction of anesthesia. In some cases, the patient may need to be standing or sitting while the skin area is marked. Marking of perforators and varicosities in chronic venous diseases, marking of stoma sites for urinary or fecal diversions are some examples. The side of surgery should ideally be marked preoperatively to avoid wrong side surgery. Marks made with conventional marking pens fade or disappear with preoperative skin preparation, whereas marks made with henna paste, which is orange to dark brown in color, last for up to 3 weeks in spite of regular showers and skin cleansing, even with ethanol. This property of henna encouraged us to use it as a preoperative skin marker. Henna paste was used as a preoperative skin marker in 250 patients. In 154 patients with chronic venous diseases, perforators and varicosities were marked during duplex scanning. Henna was used to mark the colostomy site in 28 patients with carcinoma of the rectum prior to abdominoperineal resection of the rectum (APR) (four of them laparoscopic APR) and the aspiration site in 11 patients with liver abscesses and 4 patients with pleural empyemas, under ultrasonographic (USG) guidance. In addition, henna was used to mark the correct side of surgery in 47 patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia surgery. Marking was done from 1 to 8 days before surgery. The marking with henna was clearly visible in all the cases even after preoperative skin preparation with ethanol up to 8 days after application. There were no complications associated with the marking. All marks disappeared 4 weeks after application. In terms of successful execution of the desired procedure, the use of henna marking was successful in all the cases. Henna is an ideal substance for use as a preoperative skin marker. It can be safely and effectively used as a marker for varicose vein surgery, ultrasound-guided identification of lesions, establishing the ideal site for stomas on the abdominal wall, and to identify the correct side of surgery. Markings made with henna are durable and do not fade with routine bathing or preoperative skin preparation. In most cases there are no associated complications. Henna is cheap, safe, and convenient, and indications for its use can be ubiquitous.
    World Journal of Surgery 02/2011; 35(2):311-5. · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the impact made on safe surgical practice by the introduction of correct site surgery documentation in a children’s hospital containing a surgical unit in South Yorkshire. A retrospective audit of randomly selected case notes of children attending the hospital for an ENT/Plastic surgery/Orthopaedic/General surgical procedure during a period in 2006 or 2008. Outcome measures included the total, correct and legible completion of correct site surgery documentation pre-operatively. Significant improvement was noted between the 2006 and 2008 audits in the amount of patients being correctly marked (33% vs. 91%), however there were no forms in either study that were fully and correctly completed. Legibility of the forms also improved markedly between the studies (33% vs. 98%). The completion of correct site surgery forms improved with greater publicisation of the forms, however the practicality of the numbers of people required to complete the forms needs to be reviewed. The international introduction of such forms will generate valuable data as to the future utility of these checklists. KeywordsCorrect site surgery-Errors-Theatre check lists
    Central European Journal of Medicine 01/2010; 5(4):407-410. · 0.26 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
5 Downloads
Available from
Jul 5, 2014