Article

Current anti-doping policy: a critical appraisal

Professor, Institute of movement sciences and sports medicine, Faculty of medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland. .
BMC Medical Ethics (Impact Factor: 1.6). 03/2007; 8:2. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Current anti-doping in competitive sports is advocated for reasons of fair-play and concern for the athlete's health. With the inception of the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA), anti-doping effort has been considerably intensified. Resources invested in anti-doping are rising steeply and increasingly involve public funding. Most of the effort concerns elite athletes with much less impact on amateur sports and the general public.
We review this recent development of increasingly severe anti-doping control measures and find them based on questionable ethical grounds. The ethical foundation of the war on doping consists of largely unsubstantiated assumptions about fairness in sports and the concept of a "level playing field". Moreover, it relies on dubious claims about the protection of an athlete's health and the value of the essentialist view that sports achievements reflect natural capacities. In addition, costly antidoping efforts in elite competitive sports concern only a small fraction of the population. From a public health perspective this is problematic since the high prevalence of uncontrolled, medically unsupervised doping practiced in amateur sports and doping-like behaviour in the general population (substance use for performance enhancement outside sport) exposes greater numbers of people to potential harm. In addition, anti-doping has pushed doping and doping-like behaviour underground, thus fostering dangerous practices such as sharing needles for injection. Finally, we argue that the involvement of the medical profession in doping and anti-doping challenges the principles of non-maleficience and of privacy protection. As such, current anti-doping measures potentially introduce problems of greater impact than are solved, and place physicians working with athletes or in anti-doping settings in an ethically difficult position. In response, we argue on behalf of enhancement practices in sports within a framework of medical supervision.
Current anti-doping strategy is aimed at eradication of doping in elite sports by means of all-out repression, buttressed by a war-like ideology similar to the public discourse sustaining international efforts against illicit drugs. Rather than striving for eradication of doping in sports, which appears to be an unattainable goal, a more pragmatic approach aimed at controlled use and harm reduction may be a viable alternative to cope with doping and doping-like behaviour.

Full-text

Available from: Bengt Kayser, May 31, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
142 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We would like to thank Dr. Arandjelovic [1] for taking the time to read our meta-analysis [2], which statistically synthesized the personal and psychosocial predictors of doping use in sport and other physical activity settings. Unfortunately, his remarks reveal a misunderstanding regarding the scope of our paper. In essence, Dr. Arandjelovic charged us with ‘seasoning’ our science with moralistic bias. He then presents a number of philosophical questions that, although important and relevant to the doping landscape, have nothing to do with our meta-analysis or the studies contained within it. This distance between our work and the philosophical challenges to anti-doping policy and practice is further underscored by the invitation to engage in an intellectual debate on these issues in a sports ethics or medical ethics journal.It is worth reiterating that our meta-analysis was not conceived to examine current anti-doping policy and practice, or to present views in favor or against the m ...
    Sports Medicine 02/2015; DOI:10.1007/s40279-015-0315-x · 5.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the increasing research interest and rapid growth in popularity of mixed martial arts (MMA), a detailed performance testing battery has yet to be presented in the scientific literature. A testing protocol is critical to assess the physical capacities of an elite athlete to determine the adaptations to the external training load and effectively direct targeted training interventions. Additionally, this strategy provides an objective determination of the athlete’s preparedness for high level competition. The purpose of this article is to review the physiological demands of MMA and propose a reliable and logically valid testing battery based on these demands. This testing battery is comprised of performance tests to be administered by the sports scientist on elite MMA athletes outside of a laboratory setting. It is proposed that power capabilities be assessed via the incremental load jump squat and ballistic bench press throw. Additionally, the medicine ball explosive power test is recommended as an alternative to these power assessments for strength coaches with minimal equipment. 1 repetition maximum back squat and bench press is suggested to quantify strength while a 40m sprint is described as an ideal method for determining short-term anaerobic performance in these athletes. Finally, a loaded prone bridge and Yo-Yo intermittent recovery level-2 test are presented to assess isometric strength endurance and intermittent anaerobic capacity respectively.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this case study was to observe the relationships between resting heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) measures and endurance race performance in a collegiate male cross country athlete throughout a competitive season. Resting heart rate measures were recorded daily by the athlete with a smart phone application in a seated position after waking and elimination. In addition, training load and perceived wellness values were collected and recorded daily. Retrospective analysis of the heart rate data showed a strong relationship between race time and the weekly variability in HR and HRV measures as assessed by the coefficient of variation (CV). Coaches and practitioners should consider including analysis of changes in the weekly CV of HR and HRV measures when monitoring collegiate endurance athletes as this may provide insight regarding endurance performance potential.