Article

Current anti-doping policy: a critical appraisal

Professor, Institute of movement sciences and sports medicine, Faculty of medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland. .
BMC Medical Ethics (Impact Factor: 1.6). 03/2007; 8:2. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Current anti-doping in competitive sports is advocated for reasons of fair-play and concern for the athlete's health. With the inception of the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA), anti-doping effort has been considerably intensified. Resources invested in anti-doping are rising steeply and increasingly involve public funding. Most of the effort concerns elite athletes with much less impact on amateur sports and the general public.
We review this recent development of increasingly severe anti-doping control measures and find them based on questionable ethical grounds. The ethical foundation of the war on doping consists of largely unsubstantiated assumptions about fairness in sports and the concept of a "level playing field". Moreover, it relies on dubious claims about the protection of an athlete's health and the value of the essentialist view that sports achievements reflect natural capacities. In addition, costly antidoping efforts in elite competitive sports concern only a small fraction of the population. From a public health perspective this is problematic since the high prevalence of uncontrolled, medically unsupervised doping practiced in amateur sports and doping-like behaviour in the general population (substance use for performance enhancement outside sport) exposes greater numbers of people to potential harm. In addition, anti-doping has pushed doping and doping-like behaviour underground, thus fostering dangerous practices such as sharing needles for injection. Finally, we argue that the involvement of the medical profession in doping and anti-doping challenges the principles of non-maleficience and of privacy protection. As such, current anti-doping measures potentially introduce problems of greater impact than are solved, and place physicians working with athletes or in anti-doping settings in an ethically difficult position. In response, we argue on behalf of enhancement practices in sports within a framework of medical supervision.
Current anti-doping strategy is aimed at eradication of doping in elite sports by means of all-out repression, buttressed by a war-like ideology similar to the public discourse sustaining international efforts against illicit drugs. Rather than striving for eradication of doping in sports, which appears to be an unattainable goal, a more pragmatic approach aimed at controlled use and harm reduction may be a viable alternative to cope with doping and doping-like behaviour.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Bengt Kayser, Jun 28, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
144 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Doping in sport has been explored predominantly from a user-perspective, widely neglecting an analysis of the supply-side of the market for doping products. In this article, we aim to fill a gap in the existing literature by demonstrating that the supply chains of doping substances have evolved over the course of the past two decades, not least due to the zero tolerance approach of anti-doping policy. Specifically, adopting the case studies of (elite) cycling and recreational weight-training (RWT) and bodybuilding (BB), we outline how the supply chains for performance and image enhancing drugs (PIEDs) have shifted away from “culturally embedded dealers” and into new organizational structures independent from these sub-cultures. We maintain that the evolution of doping supply mirrors the evolution of doping use; whereas doping was previously the result of a socialization process, and PIED suppliers were a cultural product, consumption is now often a secretive practice and “social suppliers” are no longer prepared to take risks in (openly) supplying doping products. Consequently, the increased clandestineness of doping practices has led consumers to increasingly consider the “black market” as a potential source for PIEDs. Most importantly, this shift in doping supply chains has led to greater inequality among athletes, increased health risks and the rise of suppliers devoid of socio-cultural characteristics. We suggest that as the current anti-doping regime, focused predominantly on punishment and control, continues unabated these unintended negative consequences are likely to increase. As several countries have begun to rethink their position on the criminalization of drugs and drug users, it is time to rethink our approach to curbing the problem of doping in sports.
    Trends in Organized Crime 01/2014; DOI:10.1007/s12117-014-9235-7
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two approaches towards anabolic androgenic steroid (AAS) use are dealt with: the first is found in the biomedical literature, centered on the effects on young men's health; the second refers to the users themselves, focusing on the sociocultural aspects of consumption. Qualitative methodology was used, based on analysis of two types of material: (i) articles from the biomedical field; (ii) material from studied conducted between 2001 and 2004, including ethnography and semi-structured interviews with nineteen male jiu-jitsu fighters in Rio de Janeiro. The results indicate that there is a mismatch between the biomedical approach, which condemns the non-therapeutic use of AAS, and the representations and practices of users who resort to these substances with the goal of improving strength and muscularity. It is concluded that the relationship between anabolic substance consumption and the social construction of masculinity needs to be further studied within the context of public health.
    Interface - Comunicação Saúde Educação 06/2012; 16(41):369-382. DOI:10.1590/S1414-32832012005000008
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Religiousness is rarely studied as protective factor against substance use and misuse in sport. Further, we have found no investigation where college-age athletes were sampled and studied accordingly. The aim of the present study was to identify gender-specific protective effects of the religiousness (measured by Santa Clara Questionnaire) and other social, educational, and sport variables as a potential factors of hesitation against doping behaviors in sport-science-students from Mostar, Bosnia, and Herzegovina (51 women and 111 men; age range, 18-26). The gender differences for the non-parametric variables were established by Kruskall-Wallis test, while for the parametric variables the t-test for independent samples was used. Multiple regression calculations revealed religiousness as the most significant predictor of the social, health, sport and legal factors of hesitation against doping behaviors in both genders. However, the differential influence of the social, educational, sport and religious factors in relation to negative consequences of the doping behaviors is found for men and women. Such differential influence must be emphasized in tailoring the anti-doping policy and interventions.
    Journal of Religion and Health 03/2011; 52(2). DOI:10.1007/s10943-011-9480-x · 1.02 Impact Factor