Schema therapy for borderline personality disorder

The Rockefeller University, NY, USA.
Journal of Clinical Psychology (Impact Factor: 2.12). 04/2006; 62(4):445-58. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20240
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This article presents the Schema Therapy (Young, Klosko, & Weishaar, 2003) approach to the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Schema therapy draws on the cognitive-behavioral, attachment, psychodynamic, and emotion-focused traditions and conceptualizes patients who have borderline personality disorder as being under the sway of five modes or aspects of the self. The goal of the therapy is to reorganize this inner structure. To this end, there are four core mechanisms of change that are used in this therapy: (1) limited reparenting, (2) experiential imagery and dialogue work, (3) cognitive restructuring and education, and (4) behavioral pattern breaking. These interventions are used during the three phases of treatment: (1) bonding and emotional regulation, (2) schema mode change, and (3) development of autonomy.


Available from: Scott Kellogg, Apr 26, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Early maladaptive schemas (EMSs) or fundamental beliefs that underpin stable and trait-like psychological disorders are chronic and relapsing. In, active schemas in dysthymic patients with major depression have been compared with healthy individuals.The purpose of this study was to compare early maladaptive schemas (Young, 2003, 1990) in dysthymic patients with major depression and healthy subjects. Method: For this study, 46 patients with major depression and 20 non-hospitalized patients with dysthymic during the year who referred to medical centers and clinics in Kermanshah (a city in West of Iran) were selected through structured interviews and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), and 66 patients with mild problems who referred to the clinic were considered as control group. 15 early maladaptive schemas through Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form (YSQ-SF) were measured. Results: Analysis of variance showed that maladaptive schemas was different in the three groups. Maladaptive schemas of emotional deprivation, social isolation, defectiveness/ shame, and failure in patients with dysthymic, and maladaptive schemas of Self-sacrifice, and unrelenting standards/ hypercriticalness, entitlement/grandiosity, were active in patients with major depression. Healthy people were not active in any schema incompatibility. Maladaptive schemas in patients with dysthymic were more than the other two groups. Conclusion: In depression group, all early maladaptive schemas except abandonment and dependence / incompetence schemas, indicated higher scores. The evidence shows that schemas of emotional deprivation, social isolation, failure, and defectiveness/shame are specific keys for dysthymic disorder and emotional inhibition, and unrelenting standards are the keys for major depressive disorder.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Zusammenfassung Diese Arbeit analysierte die Thera-pieprozesse sowie die Techniken und Verhaltensweisen der Therapeuten (d. h., " therapeutenspezifische Wirkfak-toren ") von Psychoanalyse, psychoanalytisch orientier-ter Psychotherapie und kognitiver Verhaltenstherapie. 639 Therapiesitzungen der Münchner Psychotherapie-studie wurden mit dem Psychotherapie-Prozess-Q-Sort (PQS) und der Qualität der Objektbeziehungs-Skala (QORS) analysiert. Anhand der Hauptkomponentenana-lyse wurden zwölf PQS-Item-basierte Faktoren gefun-den, die 39 % der Varianz erklären (KMO-und Bart-lett-Test: ,73; p = ,000). Neutrale vs. supportiv-direktive Haltung, Empathie, einsichtsorientierte Techniken und Arbeit an der therapeutischen Beziehung stellten thera-peutenspezifische Wirkfaktoren dar, wobei diese in den Behandlungsmethoden und in den Anfangs-, Mitte-und Endstunden unterschiedlich ausgeprägt vorkamen. Die KVT verwendete neben kognitiv-verhaltenstherapeuti-schen auch Elemente der psychoanalytischen Technik, d. h. einsichtsorientierte Techniken und die Arbeit an der therapeutischen Beziehung. Die neutrale Haltung war spezifisch für die psychoanalytischen Therapien, nahm jedoch gegen Ende der Therapie ab. In der Gesamtstich-probe zeigte sich kein direkter Zusammenhang zwischen den vier Wirkfaktoren und der Verbesserung des QORS der Patienten. Jedoch profitierten Patienten mit schwe-ren interpersonellen Schwierigkeiten von einsichts-orientierten Techniken und einer supportiv-direktiven Haltung jeweils zu unterschiedlichen Zeitpunkten der Therapie. Abstract This project analysed the therapeutic processes and especially the techniques and therapist behaviour (i.e., " therapeutic factors ") of psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic oriented psychotherapy and cognitive behavioural therapy. Data are obtained from the Munich Psychotherapy Study. Process analyses were based on audio recordings of therapy sessions by means of the Psychotherapy Process Q-Sort (PQS) and the Quality of object relation scale (QORS). A total of 639 sessions were examined. Based on the principal component analysis, twelve factors displaying specific PQS-item combinations were found explaining 39 % of the variance (KMO-and Bartlett-Test: .73; p = .000). Neutral vs. supportive-directive attitude, empathy, insight-oriented techniques and work on therapeutic relationship represented therapeutic factors. Some therapeutic factors differed distinctly between treatment modality in the early, middle and late sessions. In addition to cognitive-behavioural techniques CBT also used ingredients of psychoanalytic technique, i. e., insight-oriented Diese Arbeit ist Teil des Leitthemas " Psychotherapieforschung " .
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rationale. The new area of health system research requires a revision of the taxonomy of scientific knowledge that may facilitate a better understanding and representation of complex health phenomena in research discovery, corroboration and implementation. Method. A position paper by an expert group following and iterative approach. Results. ‘Scientific evidence’ should be differentiated from ‘elicited knowledge’ of experts and users, and this latter typology should be described beyond the traditional qualitative framework. Within this context ‘framing of scientific knowledge’ (FSK) is defined as a group of studies of prior expert knowledge specifically aimed at generating formal scientific frames. To be distinguished from other unstructured frames, FSK must be explicit, standardized, based on the available evidence, agreed by a group of experts and subdued to the principles of commensurability, transparency for corroboration and transferability that characterize scientific research. A preliminary typology of scientific framing studies is presented. This typology includes, among others, health declarations, position papers, expert-based clinical guides, conceptual maps, classifications, expert-driven health atlases and expert-driven studies of costs and burden of illness. Conclusions. This grouping of expert-based studies constitutes a different kind of scientific knowledge and should be clearly differentiated from ‘evidence’ gathered from experimental and observational studies in health system research.
    Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11/2014; 20(6). DOI:10.1111/jep.12286 · 1.58 Impact Factor