Article

Evaluation of renovascular hypertension: comparison of functional MRI and contrast-enhanced MRA with a routinely performed renal scintigraphy and DSA.

Department of Radiology, Helios Klinikum Wuppertal, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography (Impact Factor: 1.58). 01/2004; 28(6):823-31. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200411000-00016
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The main objective of this study was to evaluate a clinically suspected renovascular hypertension (RVH) by means of MRI. It was to find out if functional MRI (fMRI) is able to provide adequate results with regard to MAG3 captopril scintigraphy and if contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) is able to provide adequate results in the stenosis grading compared with the nonselective digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
This open, monocentric, prospective, phase 3 study included patients with a clinically suspected RVH. For fMRI a dynamic TurboFLASH sequence and for MRA a single-shot breath-hold flash 3D sequence was performed. Gadodiamide was injected as contrast medium.
Sixty patients were included in the study. The correlation between fMRI and scintigraphy had an accuracy, a sensitivity, and a specificity of 69%, 5%, and 92%, respectively, and correlations between MRA and DSA of 95%, 92%, and 96%.
The noninvasive MRA can replace DSA in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. However, fMRI can not replace renal scintigraphy.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
32 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hypertension is diagnosed in 1-5% of children, and 5-10% of those hypertensive children have renovascular disease. The gold standard for a diagnosis of renal artery stenosis is arteriography, and Doppler ultrasound (Doppler US) continues to be advocated as a useful screening test. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of Doppler US in children as a screening tool and to better define clinical features of children in whom arteriography should be performed. This retrospective study evaluated the imaging and clinical parameters for all children who had a renal US with Doppler followed by a diagnostic arteriogram for the evaluation of hypertension during a 12-year period at a tertiary children's hospital. Sixty-two children were included. We evaluated each child's clinical parameters and placed each child into one of three categories of hypertension: mild, moderate or severe. Eleven of 17 kidneys with proven renal artery stenosis were detected with Doppler US (sensitivity 64%). Six children with renal artery stenosis were missed by Doppler US, four of whom had segmental artery lesions. Of the children with positive renal artery stenosis on arteriography, all but three (79%) were classified as having moderate to severe hypertension. Doppler US is a useful screening examination when evaluating children with hypertension, detecting renal artery stenosis in most affected children. The clinical risk classifications are helpful in guiding which children should proceed with arteriography regardless of the Doppler US results.
    Pediatric Radiology 07/2013; · 1.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Renovascular disease (RVD) is an important cause of hypertension in children, as it often is amenable to potentially curative treatment. Imaging aimed at finding RVD therefore needs to have high sensitivity so as not to miss important findings. Digital subtraction angiography is the gold standard investigation. Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT) angiography and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography can all be helpful, but none has, at present, high enough sensitivity to rule out RVD in a child with a suggestion of that diagnosis.
    Pediatric Nephrology 10/2009; 25(6):1049-56. · 2.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare the diagnostic performance of new B-FFE MR angiography with contrast-enhance MR angiography in diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. One hundred and fourteen patients suspected of having renal artery stenosi underwent MR angiography with 2D B-FFE technique and 3D post contrast enhancement. Compared with contrast enhanced MR angiography, B-FFE MR angiography correctly depicte, significant stenotic renal arteries (> or = 50% stenosis) in 13 and 12 renal arteries from 21 renal arteries reviewed by first and second radiologists, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, negative an, positive predictive values of B-FFE MR angiography in diagnosis of significant renal artery stenosis (> or =50% stenosis) reviewed by first and second radiologists, were 57.1-61.9%, 91.9-93.6%, 96.1-96 4%, and 81.3 92.3%, respectively. B-FFE MR angiography of renal arteries can be promising technique for screening patient. who are suspected of having renovascular disease without requirement of intravenous contrast injection especially the kidney disease patients.
    Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet 08/2009; 92(8):1077-83.