Age and gender effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of triazolam, a cytochrome P450 3A substrate

Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Clinical Pharmacology &#38 Therapeutics (Impact Factor: 7.9). 11/2004; 76(5):467-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.07.009
Source: PubMed


Sixty-one healthy men and women, aged 20 to 75 years, received single 0.25-mg doses of triazolam, a cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A substrate benzodiazepine, and placebo in a double-blind crossover study. Among women, age had no significant effect on area under the triazolam plasma concentration curve (AUC) (Spearman r=0.14, P=.44) or clearance (r =-0.09, P=.62). Among men, AUC increased (r=0.43, P <.02) and clearance declined (r=-0.42, P <.02) with increasing age. Gender differences in triazolam kinetics were not apparent. Compared with placebo, triazolam impaired digit-symbol substitution test performance, increased observer-rated sedation, impaired delayed recall of information learned at 1.5 hours after dosing, and increased electroencephalographic beta amplitude. Among men, mean values of relative digit-symbol substitution test decrement (P <.002) and observer-rated sedation (P <.05) were significantly greater in elderly subjects compared with young subjects. Age-dependent differences among women reached significance for observer-rated sedation (P <.02). A combination of higher plasma levels and increased intrinsic sensitivity explained the greater pharmacodynamic effects of triazolam in elderly subjects. Although the findings are consistent with reduced clearance of triazolam in elderly men, individual variability was large and was not explained by identifiable demographic or environmental factors.

Download full-text


Available from: Richard Shader, Apr 29, 2015
  • Source
    • "This study was conducted in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, which is one of the patient populations for denosumab 60 mg every 6 months. Age and menopause do not affect CYP3A4 activity in women based on studies with midazolam (Gorski et al. 2003), triazolam (Greenblatt et al. 2004), or erythromycin (Harris et al. 1996), and osteoporosis does not appear to be associated with increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Drug–disease interactions involving therapeutic proteins that target cytokines and potentially impact cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes have been of increased interest to drug regulatory agencies and industry sponsors in recent years. This parallel-group open-label study evaluated the effects of the monoclonal antibody denosumab, an inhibitor of the cytokine RANKL, on the pharmacokinetics of the probe CYP3A4 substrate midazolam in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The pharmacokinetics of a 2 mg oral dose of midazolam was evaluated on days 1 and 16. Subjects in Group A received a 60 mg subcutaneous dose of denosumab on day 2, 2 weeks before the second midazolam dose, while subjects in Group B did not. For Group A (n = 17), point estimates for the ratio of least square means for midazolam exposures based on maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and areas under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUCs) on day 16 versus day 1 ranged from 1.02 to 1.04 and 90% confidence intervals were within 0.80–1.25. No period effect was observed for Group B (n = 8). Midazolam and denosumab coadministration was safe and well tolerated. Inhibition of the cytokine RANKL by denosumab does not affect CYP3A4 in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and will not alter the pharmacokinetics of drugs metabolized by this enzyme. These results are consistent with data suggesting that RANKL does not impact markers of inflammation and represent the first clinical data demonstrating a lack of effect on CYP3A4 of a therapeutic protein that is a cytokine modulator.
    04/2014; 2(2). DOI:10.1002/prp2.33
  • Source

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Insomnia is an extremely common condition with major social and economic consequences worldwide. Two large epidemiological studies (Morfeo 1 and Morfeo 2) recently performed in Italy provided much-needed novel data on the impact of insomnia in patients whose primary healthcare is provided by general practitioners (GPs). These studies found that insomnia is managed relatively well by GPs in Italy, although diagnosis and treatment can be compromised because of the lack of standardised criteria. Although a number of consensus reports on insomnia have been published, these are mainly highly specific documents that are difficult to implement in general practice. To address this, a consensus group involving 695 GPs and over 60 specialists from the Italian Association of Sleep Medicine was established. The major objectives of the consensus study were to establish basic knowledge for the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia, and to produce guidelines for the management of insomnia by GPs. This is the first time that GPs have been directly involved in producing insomnia guidelines of this type, and this approach reflects their pivotal role in the diagnosis and management of this condition. Participants were carefully selected to ensure adequate representation of sleep specialists and GPs, with the group being headed by a steering committee and an advisory board. Guideline statements were selected following careful literature review and were voted on using formalised consensus procedures. This review describes current views on the diagnosis and management of insomnia from the perspective of the GP. In addition, the results of the consensus study are presented. They include recognition of the following principles: (i) insomnia is a genuine pathology that must be appropriately diagnosed and treated; (ii) when concomitant pathologies are present, additional significance should be given to treatment of insomnia since it can influence prognosis of coexistent disorders; (iii) appropriate treatment should consider the cause of insomnia as well as the characteristics of available pharmacological agents; (iv) with regard to hypnotic drugs, preference should be given to medications with a short half-life in order to limit residual effects; (v) non-benzodiazepine hypnotics are preferred to classic benzodiazepines as they have higher selectivity and present a lower risk of undesirable effects; (vi) tablets are preferable to liquid preparations as they are less likely to lead to dependence and to overdosing by the patient; and (vi) once treatment has been initiated, insomnia patients should be carefully followed up. These statements provide much needed criteria for better management of insomnia by GPs in Italy.
    Clinical Drug Investigation 12/2004; 25(12):745-764. · 1.56 Impact Factor
Show more