Article

Diagnostic Controversies in Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Department of Psychiastry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California-Los Angeles, Suite 1414, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
American Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 13.56). 11/2004; 161(11):1948-56. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.11.1948
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT While it is increasingly recognized that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) persists into adulthood, there is no consensus on diagnostic criteria for adult ADHD. In this article the authors describe and contrast competing approaches for diagnosis of adult ADHD used in clinical and research practice.
The authors review the Wender Utah criteria, DSM criteria, and laboratory assessment strategies for adult ADHD. Advantages and disadvantages of each approach are described, and recommendations are made as a basis for clinical assessment and future research.
Both the Wender Utah criteria and DSM-based approaches identify significantly impaired ADHD adults with neurocognitive, biological, and treatment response patterns similar to pediatric ADHD patients. The Wender Utah criteria established the need for retrospective childhood diagnosis and recognize developmental differences in adult symptom expression. The Wender Utah criteria fail to identify patients with predominantly inattentive symptoms, exclude some patients with significant comorbid psychopathology, and diverge significantly from the DSM conception of ADHD. The DSM criteria have never been validated in adults, do not include developmentally appropriate symptoms and thresholds for adults, and fail to identify some significantly impaired adults who are likely to benefit from treatment. There are insufficient scientific data to justify use of laboratory assessment measures, including neuropsychological tests and brain imaging, in diagnosing adult ADHD.
Adult ADHD remains a clinical diagnosis. Clinicians should be flexible in application of the current ADHD criteria to adults. Additional research is required to validate adult diagnostic criteria.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Russell A Barkley, Jan 21, 2014
2 Followers
 · 
126 Views
    • "Subjects with significant medical conditions likely to become unstable during the trial or likely to be destabilized by treatment with MPH (for example, cardiovascular disease) were excluded. Whenever possible, the subjects' partners participated in all visits, a procedure employed in the development of the WRAADDS and an approach that has been endorsed by McGough and Barkley (2004). These informants were often able to view more keenly the subjects' behavior and symptoms, as well as treatment response, than were the subjects themselves. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Much recent research describes the importance of emotional symptoms in ADHD. While there is no accepted system for including emotionality in diagnosing ADHD, the Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (WRAADDS) provides a tool to facilitate this. It assesses a range of adult ADHD symptoms which load on two factors: inattentive and emotional dysregulation. The consistently high inattentive factor was used to define significant elevation on the more variable emotional dysregulation factor (which contains four WRAADDS domains: hyperactivity/restlessness, temper, affective lability, and emotional over-reactivity) allowing the definition of two ADHD diagnostic types. We compared these two types on a broad range of adult subject characteristics, including response to methylphenidate (MPH) treatment assessed during two clinical trials. Marked impairment in three of the four emotional domains reflected a symptom severity level equivalent to that of the inattentive factor. 59 % met this threshold, defining them as ADHD emotion dysregulation presentation, as opposed to 41 % with ADHD inattentive presentation. Cluster analysis validated these groups by generating similar clusters with 85 % agreement regarding membership. ADHD emotional dysregulation presentation subjects showed more childhood ADHD symptoms, adult symptoms of oppositional defiant disorder, and evidence of personality disorder. Both types showed similar improvement during the double-blind MPH arm of the trials and during a 6-month open-label phase. Based on the presence of symptoms of emotional dysregulation, ADHD in adults can be conceptualized as two types. Impairment and comorbidity in adults with ADHD are largely concentrated in ADHD emotional dysregulation presentation patients.
    ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders 05/2015; 7(2). DOI:10.1007/s12402-015-0176-z
  • Source
    • "Several reasons may explain why subjects diagnosed with HD at CAMHS are less likely to be followedup in AMHS than subjects without HD at CAMHS. First, although symptoms of inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity present differently in adulthood, current diagnostic criteria are geared toward symptom identification during childhood [6] [24] [25]. Second, many adults with hyperactivity are seen by mental health practitioners who are not familiar with the adult presentation of the disorder or are reluctant to diagnose ADHD/HD in adults [1]. "
  • Source
    • "This includes efforts to consider how best to identify and describe adult ADHD (e.g. McGough & Barkley, 2004; Faraone, Biederman & Spencer, 2010). It makes sense that, in conjunction with a basic tendency to argue and act in defiance, a failure to think through to likely outcomes and to act impulsively rather than deliberately may lead to difficulties finding appropriate interpersonal negotiation strategies that work or being able to give thought as to why past strategies have not been successful. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Very few studies have prospective information, especially regarding males, on the prediction of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) in adulthood from psychiatric disorders in childhood. Certain childhood disorders, however, have notably similar features in common with BPD. In particular, the affective dysfunction, hostility and interpersonal conflict of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) and the impulsivity of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in particular may be indicative of an early developmental path towards BPD. The present study uses longitudinal data from a clinical sample of 177 boys, initially between the ages of 7 and 12, who were followed up annually to age 18, and who were reassessed at age 24 (n = 142). The study examines the prediction from repeated childhood measures of psychopathology measured annually through adolescence to BPD symptoms assessed at age 24, accounting for the effects of covariates including substance use, other personality disorders at age 24 and harsh physical punishment. The prevalence of BPD in this sample was consistent with other population estimates. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and ODD were the only child psychiatric disorders to predict BPD symptoms, and the oppositional behavioral dimension of ODD was particularly predictive of BPD. These results indicate possible developmental links between early psychiatric disorders and BPD.
    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 08/2011; 40(1):35-44. DOI:10.1007/s10802-011-9558-7 · 3.09 Impact Factor
Show more