Article

Stress-induced breathlessness in asthma

Leiden University, Leyden, South Holland, Netherlands
Psychological Medicine (Impact Factor: 5.43). 11/1999; 29(6):1359-66. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291799008958
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A majority of patients with asthma believe that psychological factors (particularly stress) can induce asthma attacks, but empirical support for actual stress-induced airways obstruction is controversial. This study tested the hypothesis that stress induces breathlessness and not airways obstruction.
Stress was induced by a frustrating computer task in 30 adolescents with asthma and 20 normal controls, aged 14-19 years. Stress measures were self-reported emotions, heart rate, blood pressure. Respiratory measures were respiratory rate (RR), end tidal CO2, deep inspirations and sighs. Asthma measures were lung function, wheeze, cough, breathlessness.
All measures confirmed high levels of negative emotions and stress. None of the participants developed airways obstruction; they had no reduction in lung function, wheeze was absent and cough negligible. However, breathlessness increased in all participants with asthma and excessively in many. The mean breathlessness was higher than during induction of actual airways obstruction with provocative agents in previous studies. End tidal CO2 showed that breathlessness could not be explained by hypocapnia.
Stress can be sufficient to induce breathlessness in patients with asthma.

0 Followers
 · 
72 Views
  • Source
    • "Two of three film studies that showed no significant change or low effect sizes have relied on pre-post assessments only (Table 2). An additional number of studies that showed weak or no effects have also relied on discrete assessments (Miklich et al., 1973; Rietveld et al., 1999; Kang and Fox, 2000; McQuaid et al., 2000; Put et al., 2004; Aboussafy et al., 2006; von Leupoldt et al., 2006). However, emotions have been conceptualized as phasic, transient events of a short duration (Levenson, 1988). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psychosocial factors have been found to impact airway pathophysiology in respiratory disease with considerable consistency. Influences on airway mechanics have been studied particularly well. The goal of this article is to review the literature on airway responses to psychological stimulation, discuss potential pathways of influence, and present a well-established emotion-induction paradigm to study airway obstruction elicited by unpleasant stimuli. Observational studies have found systematic associations between lung function and daily mood changes. The laboratory-based paradigm of bronchoconstrictive suggestion has been used successfully to elicit airway obstruction in a substantial proportion of asthmatic individuals. Other studies have demonstrated modulation of airway responses to standard airway challenges with exercise, allergens, or pharmacological agents by psychological factors. Standardized emotion-induction techniques have consistently shown airway constriction during unpleasant stimulation, with surgery, blood, and injury stimuli being particularly powerful. Findings with various forms of stress induction have been more mixed. A number of methodological factors may account for variability across studies, such as choice of measurement technique, temporal association between stimulation and measurement, and the specific quality and intensity of the stimulus material, in particular the extent of implied action-orientation. Research has also begun to elucidate physiological processes associated with psychologically induced airway responses, with vagal excitation and ventilatory influences being the most likely candidate pathways, whereas the role of specific central nervous system pathways and inflammatory processes has been less studied. The technique of emotion-induction using films has the potential to become a standardized challenge paradigm for the further exploration of airway hyperresponsiveness mediated by central nervous system processes.
    Frontiers in Physiology 09/2012; 3:343. DOI:10.3389/fphys.2012.00343 · 3.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Stress has been linked to asthma-related morbidity (Wright et al., 1998, Rietveld et al., 2000) and negative life events have been linked to poorer asthma-specific quality of life (Archea et al., 2007)¨ Wright and co-authors propose a biopsychosocial model in which environmental demands (stressors or life events) lead to negative emotional responses, then physiological responses, and, finally, an increased risk of more severe physical disease. Clinical reports have suggested connections between an individual's experiences of stress, upset, anxiety and asthma attacks (Rietveld et al., 1999, Rumbak et al., 1993). Depression is associated with increased steroid use and greater health care utilization in asthma (Eisner et al., 2005, Stein et al., 2006, Kullowatz et al., 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We investigated whether perceived neighborhood problems (NP) predicted changes over a 2-year period in asthma-specific quality of life (QOL), physical functioning (PF), and depressive symptomology (DEP) in a longitudinal cohort of 340 adults with asthma. There is a threshold and plateau effect between NP and PF, such that NP do not affect changes in PF until the problems reach the level of Quartile 3. People who had NP scores in Quartile 3 had lower PF compared to people who reported NP in Quartiles 1 or 2 (mean difference -3.09). High NP also predicted over two-fold odds of high DEP (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression [CES-D] score > or = 16) at follow-up (odds ratio=2.34; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-5.00). NP did not predict decline in QOL. Analyses adjusted for demographics, asthma severity, and baseline value of the health outcome.
    Health & Place 09/2008; 14(3):468-77. DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.09.003 · 2.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "3–6 h) increase behavioural, neural , and endocrine responses to stress, which persist throughout life, owing to altered development and regulation of neurones orchestrating the stress response especially at the level of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVH) (for review, see Francis and Meaney, 1999). The proximate mechanisms underlying the effects of NMS on CNS development are still the subject of much debate (Macri et al., 2004); however, these effects of NMS on the stress response have important clinical implications since differences responsiveness affect health outcomes under conditions of stress (Seckl and Meaney, 1993; Francis and Meaney, 1999), and contribute to a broad range of psychological and physiological disorders such as hypertension, asthma, states of panic and anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders (Herman and Cullinan, 1997; Rietveld et al., 1999). While these findings emphasise once again the importance of the neonatal period in central nervous system development, several observations brought us to hypothesise a link between neonatal maternal separation and respiratory disorders. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The neonatal period is critical for central nervous system (CNS) development. Recent studies have shown that this basic neurobiological principle also applies to the neural circuits regulating respiratory activity as exposure to excessive or insufficient chemosensory stimuli during early life can have long-lasting consequences on the performance of this vital system. Although the tactile, olfactory, and auditory stimuli that the mother provides to her offspring during the neonatal period are not directly relevant to respiratory homeostasis, they likely contribute to respiratory control development. This review outlines the rationale for the link between maternal stimuli and programming of the hypoxic ventilatory response during early life, and presents recent results obtained in rats indicating that experimental disruption of mother-pup interaction during this critical period elicits significant phenotypic plasticity of the hypoxic ventilatory response.
    Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology 12/2005; 149(1-3):313-24. DOI:10.1016/j.resp.2005.04.014 · 1.97 Impact Factor
Show more