Article

CT-based dosimetry calculations for 125I prostate implants.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles 90095-6951, USA.
International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics (Impact Factor: 4.18). 12/1999; 45(5):1347-53. DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00343-0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the Monte Carlo code MCNP4B for low-energy brachytherapy calculations, including the effects of interseed attenuation and patient specific heterogeneities, on the calculated dose distribution from transperineal implantation of 125I.
The Monte Carlo code MCNP4B was used to model and benchmark the absolute dose distribution from two 125I brachytherapy seeds (model 6711 and 6702). Based upon the physical source model, the total photon intensity and differential energy spectrum were evaluated as a function of angle from the transverse bisector of the source. These spectral and intensity data were reformatted to produce probability distributions for sampling from a virtual point source. The virtual source model and a modified version of MCNP4B is then used for simulating arbitrary brachytherapy source configurations within a homogeneous or heterogeneous patient specific computed tomography (CT)-based lattice geometry.
Comparison with TG-43 data and the Monte Carlo calculations is excellent with MCNP4B predicting the radial dose function for the 125I 6711 and 6702 sources within 6% for all data points tested. Attenuation effects from neighboring seeds were investigated for pre- and postimplant seed distributions and found to be negligible. Preliminary dosimetry analysis of postimplant seed distributions comparing homogeneous water versus heterogeneous CT simulation geometries indicates an average decrease of approximately 5.6% for the volume of tissue irradiated to a prescription isodose line of 144 Gy.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
76 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The effective thermal conductivity of Cu–Fe and Sn–Al miscibility gap alloys over a range of temperatures and volume fractions was determined using the Lattice Monte Carlo method. The Cu–Fe system was found to have an effective conductivity predictable by the Maxwell–Eucken model. The Sn–Al system was not consistent with any empirical model analysed. The microstructures of physical samples were approximated using a random growth algorithm calibrated to electron or optical microscope images. Charts of effective conductivity against temperature for a number of volume fractions are presented for the two alloys. It was determined that the Cu–Fe alloy would benefit from an interstice type microstructure and the Sn–Al would be more efficient with a hard spheres type microstructure. More general conclusions are drawn about the efficiency of the two observed microstructures.
    International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 10/2014; 77:395–405. · 2.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim To use Monte Carlo (MC) together with voxel phantoms to analyze the tissue heterogeneity effect in the dose distributions and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) for 125I prostate implants. Background Dose distribution calculations in low dose-rate brachytherapy are based on the dose deposition around a single source in a water phantom. This formalism does not take into account tissue heterogeneities, interseed attenuation, or finite patient dimensions effects. Tissue composition is especially important due to the photoelectric effect. Materials and methods The computed tomographies (CT) of two patients with prostate cancer were used to create voxel phantoms for the MC simulations. An elemental composition and density were assigned to each structure. Densities of the prostate, vesicles, rectum and bladder were determined through the CT electronic densities of 100 patients. The same simulations were performed considering the same phantom as pure water. Results were compared via dose–volume histograms and EUD for the prostate and rectum. Results The mean absorbed doses presented deviations of 3.3–4.0% for the prostate and of 2.3–4.9% for the rectum, when comparing calculations in water with calculations in the heterogeneous phantom. In the calculations in water, the prostate D90 was overestimated by 2.8–3.9% and the rectum D0.1cc resulted in dose differences of 6–8%. The EUD resulted in an overestimation of 3.5–3.7% for the prostate and of 7.7–8.3% for the rectum. Conclusions The deposited dose was consistently overestimated for the simulation in water. In order to increase the accuracy in the determination of dose distributions, especially around the rectum, the introduction of the model-based algorithms is recommended.
    Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy 11/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To use Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and sector analysis to assess interseed attenuation and scatter (ISA) and tissue effects in permanent seed implant prostate brachytherapy and to compare methods for modeling tissue.
    Brachytherapy 06/2014; · 1.99 Impact Factor