Ovarian function before and after salpingectomy in artificial reproductive technology patients.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin 70300, Israel, affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University.
Human Reproduction (Impact Factor: 4.67). 01/2000; 15(1):142-4. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.1.142
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine the effect of the removal of the tube on ovarian function we studied 52 artificial reproduction technology cycles in 26 women before and after undergoing laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy. Ovarian response was measured by the duration and quantity of human menopausal gonadotrophins used in the cycle, the pre-ovulatory concentrations of oestradiol, the number of oocytes retrieved, and the quality of the embryos. All parameters were compared between cycles carried out before and after salpingectomy as well as between affected and unaffected sides. Our findings show no significant difference in any of the parameters studied. We conclude that laparoscopic salpingectomy does not abate ovarian response in artificial reproduction technology cycles that follow the procedure.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the consequence of salpingectomy on ovarian reserve by measuring anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels prior to in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment in salpingectomised compared with non-salpingectomised women with tubal-factor infertility, women with unexplained infertility and fertile control women, and to evaluate whether AMH levels could predict IVF outcome. Cross-sectional study extended from a previousl prospective study. Four university fertility clinics. Seventy-one women with infertility and 21 fertile controls. Blood sampling and IVF and embryo transfer in the following cycle. Serum AMH levels and oocytes retrieved. AMH levels were significantly lower in the salpingectomy infertility group (median 16.1, range 5.2-54 pmol/l) compared to the non-salpingectomy tubal-factor infertility group (median 23.4, range 3.5-50 pmol/l; p=0.04). In all groups, AMH levels correlated positively with the number of oocytes retrieved. AMH predicted poor response (≤5 oocytes) with a sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 70%, at a 19 pmol/l cut-off value. Serum AMH levels were lower in salpingectomised women compared to women with tubal-factor infertility and preserved Fallopian tubes, indicating that ovarian reserve might be affected by tubal surgery. Furthermore, serum AMH levels could predict a poor oocyte response (<5 oocytes) in the study group of infertile women. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica 08/2013; · 1.85 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of salpingectomy on the ovarian response to gonadotropins and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycle outcomes in women with tubal factor infertility. DESIGN: A retrospective study (Canadian Task Force Classification II-3) SETTING: An in vitro fertilization laboratory in a university hospital in Taiwan. PATIENTS: We analyzed the outcomes of 288 consecutive fresh IVF-ET cycles in 251 consecutive women with tubal factor infertility from January 2001 to December 2011. Two hundred eighty-eight cycles were divided into 2 groups comprising 103 cycles with laparoscopic salpingectomy and 185 cycles with prior bilateral tubal sterilization, laparoscopic tuboplasty, or proximal tubal occlusion as the control group. INTERVENTIONS: Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IVF-ET. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main outcome was measured by comparing the duration of stimulation, number of gonadotropin ampoules per cycle, number of follicles, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate. We observed no significant difference in any ovarian response parameter between the salpingectomy and nonsalpingectomy groups. Implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and live birth rates were similar. The mean numbers of follicles and oocytes retrieved ipsilateral to the operated side in the salpingectomy group were similar to the numbers of follicles and oocytes retrieved from the nonoperated ovary. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic salpingectomy did not have a negative effect on the ovarian response in women with tubal factor infertility.
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 05/2013; · 1.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study is aimed to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic salpingostomy on ovarian stromal blood flow indices in patients with ectopic pregnancy, and to compare the ovarian stromal blood flow indices with matched paired healthy women. We included 37 patients who underwent laparoscopic salpingostomy and 37 age- and parity-matched women as controls. The main outcome was the differences in ovarian volume, antral follicle count (AFC), and ovarian stromal blood flow indices between the study group participants after the surgery and the healthy controls. Comparison of the ovarian parameters between the study group after the surgery and the control group revealed no significant differences in terms of ovarian volume (p = 0.783), AFC (p = 0.253), ovarian stromal S/D ratios (p = 0.054), pulsatility index (PI; p = 0.938) and resistance index (RI; p = 0.041). In addition, comparison of the ovarian parameters before and after the surgical treatment revealed no significant differences in the ovarian volume (p = 0.141), AFC (p = 0.084), ovarian stromal S/D ratios (p = 0.187), PI (p = 0.102) and RI (p = 0.108). In conclusion, laparoscopic salpingostomy does not affect ovarian function in terms of ovarian stromal blood flow indices, ovarian volume, and AFC.
    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 05/2013; 33(4):399-402. · 0.55 Impact Factor