Epidemiology of oral contraceptives and cardiovascular disease.

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Annals of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 16.1). 03/1998; 128(6):467-77. DOI: 10.1097/00007611-199809000-00026
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To review the association between combined oral contraceptives and cardiovascular disease, with emphasis on oral contraceptives containing low doses of estrogen (low-dose oral contraceptives).
A systematic search of the MEDLINE database was done for all relevant articles published between 1967 (when low-dose oral contraceptives were introduced in the United States) and June 1997. Textbooks, meeting proceedings, and reference lists were also searched.
All English-language human epidemiology studies of oral contraceptives that used cardiovascular disease as an end point were reviewed. Animal and metabolic studies were reviewed only if they were especially relevant to the mechanism of action of oral contraceptives.
Descriptive and analytic data from each study were collected.
Data were organized by cardiovascular end point, study design, estrogen dose, and type of progestogen. Data on relative and absolute risk are presented to address current prescription guidelines.
The risk for cardiovascular disease is lower with current preparations of oral contraceptives, including those that contain the new progestogens, than with older oral contraceptives containing high doses of estrogen. Among users of low-dose oral contraceptives, cardiovascular diseases occur mainly in smokers and women with predisposing factors. Every effort should be made to encourage smoking cessation among potential users of oral contraceptives.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction of the birth control pill in the United States in 1960 marked the end of a relatively short period of time (< 10 years) to intentionally produce an oral contraceptive, and the beginning of a relatively long period of controversy surrounding the use of the pill. Availability of the pill had an impact on various aspects of social life, including women's health, fertility trends, laws and policies, religion, interpersonal relationships and family roles, feminist issues, and gender relations, as well as sexual practices among both adults and adolescents. The pill proved to be highly effective from the outset. Although safety issues developed with the earlier formulations, continued evolution of pill hormones and doses has resulted in a greatly improved and safe oral contraceptive. A broad range of noncontraceptive health benefits also is associated with the pill. These health effects are significant, as they include protection against potentially fatal diseases, including ovarian and endometrial cancers, as well as against other conditions that are associated with substantial morbidity and potential hospitalization and associated costs. The popularity of the pill has remained high, with rates of use in the past 30 years in the United States ranging from one-quarter to almost one-third of women using contraception. Almost 40 years after its introduction, the pill's contraceptive efficacy is proven, its improved safety has been established, and the focus has shifted from supposed health risks to documented and real health benefits.
    Contraception 01/1999; 59(1 Suppl):11S-16S. DOI:10.1016/S0010-7824(98)00131-0 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The high estrogen doses in the original oral contraceptive (OC) formulations were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Since then the steroid doses in OC have been reduced steadily, so that current low-estrogen-dose (< or = 35 micrograms) combination OC are associated with a lower risk of arterial and venous events than occurs with higher-estrogen-dose formulations. Based on the currently available epidemiologic evidence, the following conclusions can be made regarding the cardiovascular disease risks associated with use of low-dose OC by healthy, nonsmoking women: there is no increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) or hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke; and there is a three- to fourfold increased risk of venous thrombosis and embolism (VTE). This risk is about half that associated with pregnancy. Smoking is the most important independent risk factor for MI, and is synergistic with OC use. Women smokers should be advised strongly to stop smoking, but those aged < 35 years may use any OC containing < or = 35 micrograms of estrogen. Women smokers aged > or = 35 years should be advised to use a nonestrogen or nonhormonal contraceptive method.
    Contraception 02/1999; 59(1 Suppl):21S-24S. DOI:10.1016/S0010-7824(98)00133-4 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The concurret use of smoking and oral contraceptives affects the hemostatic balance, thereby inducing a thrombophilic state. In order to clarify the effects of this association on the hemostatic system, the possible changes in the markers of activation of coagulation (thrombin-antithrombin III complexes and prothrombin fragment F1+2) were evaluated in 35 women given a third-generation oral contraceptive for 6 months; 13 of these women (37.1%) were mild or moderate smokers. No differences were found in basal levels of the coagulation and fibrinolytic parameters between smokers and non-smokers. During oral contraceptive administration, both F1+2 fragment and thrombin-antithrombin III complex concentrations significantly increased both in smokers and in non-smokers (p < 0.01). Fibrinogen plasma levels increased in both groups (p < 0.01). Antithrombin III activity was reduced in both groups during treatment, but the difference was significant only in smokers (p < 0.05). Although the sample size of smokers was too small to draw definitive conclusions, present results appeared to confirm previous data about the effect of the concurrent use of smoking and oral contraceptives on antithrombin III levels, but did not demonstrate any additional effect of moderate smoking on the activation of the clotting system induced by this oral contraceptive preparation.
    The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care 09/1999; 4(3):113-8. DOI:10.3109/13625189909040805 · 1.84 Impact Factor