Genetic variation in IGF2 and HTRA1 and breast cancer risk among BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers.

Department of Population Sciences, the Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers &amp Prevention (Impact Factor: 4.56). 06/2011; 20(8):1690-702. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1336
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers have a lifetime breast cancer risk of 40% to 80%, suggesting the presence of risk modifiers. We previously identified significant associations in genetic variants in the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling pathway. Here, we investigate additional IGF signaling genes as risk modifiers for breast cancer development in BRCA carriers.
A cohort of 1,019 BRCA1 and 500 BRCA2 mutation carriers were genotyped for 99 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in 13 genes. Proportional hazards regression was used to model time from birth to diagnosis of breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers separately. For linkage disequilibrium (LD) blocks with multiple SNPs, an additive genetic model was used. For an SNP analysis, no additivity assumptions were made.
Significant associations were found between risk of breast cancer and LD blocks in IGF2 for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (global P values of 0.009 for BRCA1 and 0.007 for BRCA2), HTRA1 for BRCA1 carriers (global P value of 0.005), and MMP3 for BRCA2 carriers (global P = 0.0000007 for BRCA2).
We identified significant associations of genetic variants involved in IGF signaling. With the known interaction of BRCA1 and IGF signaling and the loss of PTEN in a majority of BRCA1 tumors, this suggests that signaling through AKT may modify breast cancer risk in BRCA1 carriers.
These results suggest potential avenues for future research targeting the IGF signaling pathway in modifying risk in BRCA1and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Genetic alterations are important drivers of breast cancer development. Rare, high penetrance mutations, including BRCA1 and BRCA2, account for a minority of breast cancer cases. Recent advances in genomic sequencing technologies have aided the search for additional genetic modifiers of breast cancer risk. An increasing number of risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are being identified. These SNPs are relatively common in the studied populations, and while they generally confer a small increase in risk individually, they may act in combination to alter risk more substantially. This review synthesizes the current understanding of these genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk, and discusses experiences and challenges with implementing them into existing risk models and into clinical practice. As additional SNPs are discovered and risk estimates are refined, the aim will be to use this information to guide personalized decisions around managing risk, and to deepen our understanding of breast carcinogenesis.
    Current Breast Cancer Reports 4(4).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to investigate the expression patterns of IGF2 and IMP3 in osteosarcoma as well as its relationship with angiogenesis in the tumor. IGF2 and IMP3 expression was detected by immunohistochemical staining in the serial sections of the osteosarcoma. The impacts of IGF2 and IMP3 expression patterns on tumor angiogenesis were evaluated by statistics. The IGF2 and IMP3 staining had different expression patterns in different osteosarcoma. Twelve out of the sixty-four cases of conventional osteosarcoma showed nuclear staining patterns, and twenty-nine showed cytoplasmic staining of IGF2 and IMP3 simultaneously. On the other hand, fourteen cases showed nuclear IGF2 staining but cytoplasmic IMP3 expression, and nine cases showed nuclear IMP3 staining and cytoplasmic IGF2 expression. Twenty-eight out of forty-seven cases of parosteal osteosarcoma showed nuclear IGF2 and IMP3 expression, nine showed cytoplasmic IGF2 and IMP3 expression simultaneously. Seven out of forty-seven cases of parosteal osteosarcoma expressed IGF2 with nuclear staining but expressed IMP3 with cytoplasmic staining. Meanwhile, three cases expressed IGF2 with cytoplasmic staining but expressed IMP3 with nuclear staining. Similar to the parosteal osteosarcoma, the periosteal osteosarcoma expressed IGF2 and IMP3 mainly with nuclear staining simultaneously, forty out of fifty-five cases of periosteal osteosarcoma did that. Five out of fifty-five cases expressed IGF2 and IMP3 with cytoplasmic staining at the same time. Four cases showed nuclear IGF2 staining and cytoplasmic IMP3 staining. In the parosteal and periosteal osteosarcoma, there was no significant difference in IGF and IMP3 expression patterns (P = 0.216). However, compared with conventional osteosarcoma, the parosteal and periosteal osteosarcoma showed significant difference in IMP3 and IGF2 expression (P = 0.016, P = 0.023). IGF2 and IMP3 expression patterns were positive correlation in the different osteosarcoma (r = 0.1021, P = 0.032). The Microvessel density (MVD) in osteosarcoma with IGF2 and IMP3 cytoplasmic staining was more than that with nuclear expression of IGF2 and IMP3, and the difference was significant (P = 0.024). Moreover, the conventional osteosarcoma with cytoplasmic IGF and IMP3 showed more MVD than parosteal and periosteal osteosarcoma with cytoplasmic IGF and IMP3, and the difference was significant (P = 0.035). IGF2 and IMP3 had different expression patterns, which might be associated with angiogenesis. However, cytoplasmic and nuclear expression of IGF2 and IMP3 might play different roles in the angiogenesis of osteosarcoma.
    Journal of molecular histology 02/2012; 43(1):63-70. · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Studies have shown that the high temperature requirement factor A3 (HtrA3) is involved in important physiological processes including maintenance of mitochondrial homeostasis, cell death, and cell signaling. HtrA3 is reported to be downregulated in several cancers and has been correlated with advancing cancer stage. We performed a retrospective study using our breast cancer tissue bank to investigate whether the expression of HtrA3 correlated with lymphatic metastasis in breast cancer and whether the expression of HtrA3 was correlated with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression in breast cancer. Breast cancer tissues from 156 invasive ductal breast cancer patients with or without lymphatic metastasis were collected and the levels of HtrA3 were measured by immunohistochemistry and western blotting. The expression of HtrA3 was lower in breast cancer. In particular, HtrA3 expression in breast cancer with lymphatic metastasis was lower than that in breast cancer without lymphatic metastasis. In breast cancers with no lymphatic metastasis, the expression of HtrA3 was lower in patients with ER- and PR-positive tumors, but when breast cancers with lymphatic metastasis were analyzed, there was no difference in HtrA3 expression between ER- and PR-positive or ER- and PR-negative tumors. These data suggest that the expression of HtrA3 was negatively correlated with lymphatic metastasis in breast cancer but not correlated with ER and PR positivity or negativity. A better understanding of the mechanism of HtrA3 may provide the basis for future development of a novel therapeutic target in breast cancer.
    Tumor Biology 06/2013; · 2.52 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 1, 2014