Knowledge, attitude and practice towards blood donation in Iranian population.
ABSTRACT The increase in demand for blood products because of new surgical and medical procedures seeks more research to find new ways to recruit people to donate blood.
To determine the level of people's knowledge about donating blood considering its relation with infectious and chronic diseases, drug abuse, unsafe sexual intercourse, menstruation and anaemia. In addition, their attitude towards blood donation regarding their previous behaviour and factors such as altruism, religion, family, fears and availability of blood donation centres has been evaluated.
This study was conducted in Tehran, Iran in 2009 on 1000 respondents. Data were collected through questionnaires that comprised 37 questions considering demographic and background characteristics, level of knowledge and positive and negative attitudes towards blood donation. Finally, data were analysed using SPSS software.
Of 1000 in this study, 26% were donors, of whom 55% had donated blood more than once. The mean knowledge score of the participants was 8·6, which was associated with the subjects' gender and level of education (P = 0·031 and P < 0·001, respectively). Age, gender and level of education were significantly associated with one's attitude towards blood donation (P = 0·021, P < 0·001 and P = 0·003,respectively). Ninety-five percent of people have stated that their main motivation to donate blood was altruism.
Altruism and being encouraged by others had the leading roles in peoples' positive attitude towards blood donation; whereas hard access to blood donation centres seemed to be the main inhibitory factor.
- SourceAvailable from: Maria Saridi[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Introduction: According to the Council of Europe, blood donation is considered a volunteer act if donors offer some of their blood, plasma or cellular elements urged by their own will and do not get any kind of reward, money or anything that could be a substitute for money. National blood needs increase more rapidly than blood donations, hence there is a need to boost volunteer blood donations. Aim: The aim of the present study was to investigate attitudes, perceptions and motives of volunteer blood donors in a general hospital. Materials and Methods: 214 individuals (190 males and 24 females) who visited the Blood Donation Dept. of the Ptolemaida General Hospital for three months participated in the study. An anonymous self-completion questionnaire was used for data collection. The SPSS 16 software was used for the statistical analysis. Results: Years of blood donation seem to be affected by sex, family status and age. More specifically, males (Mann-Whitney U=1279, p=0.003),married participants (Mann-Whitney U=1402, p<0.001) and older age participants (Spearman’s rho=0,671, p<0.001), used to be blood donors for more years compared to females, singles and younger participants. Regarding the cause of their current blood donation, almost half of the participants said they had given blood because of a relative or friend in need, while the rest were volunteer blood donors. Factors that seemed to have an impact on the blood donors included family influence, interaction with friends or relatives who used to be blood donors, while more than half of the participants (53.7%) described themselves as regular blood donors. Finally, the older the participant, the more likely it was for them to be regular blood donors (Point-biserial r=0.291, p<0,001). Conclusions: Some actions that could boost the number of blood donors in Greece include well-coordinated health education programs and awareness-raising campaigns, as well as state support and the implementation of a specific and motivating legislative framework. Keywords: Blood donation, volunteer blood donors, attitudes regarding blood donation, transfusion, donors’ motives
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Background. Blood donation is remarkably safe medical procedure. However, attitudes, beliefs, and level of knowledge may affect it. Objectives. To measure the level of knowledge regarding blood donation, find out positive and negative attitudes, identify the obstacles, and suggest some motivational factors. Methodology. A cross-sectional study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC). Participants were selected by convenient nonrandom sampling technique. A self-created questionnaire was used for data collection. Results. The study included 349 individuals. About 45.8% of the participants claimed that they have a history of blood donation. Reported causes for not donating blood were blood donation not crossing their mind (52.4%), no time for donation (45%), and difficulty in accessing blood donation center (41.3%). Reported motivating factors for donating blood were one day off (81.4%), mobile blood donation caravans in public areas (79.1%), token gifts (31.5%), and finally paying money (18.9%). Conclusion. People in the age group 31-50 years, males, higher education and military were more likely to donate blood as well as People who showed higher knowledge level and positive attitude towards blood donation. More educational programs to increase the awareness in specific targeted populations and also to focus on some motivational factors are recommended.01/2014; 2014:539670. DOI:10.1155/2014/539670
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Empathy refers to a personality character that has a great role in communication with others. Thus, proper evaluation and education of empathy in medical students is important for medical education. Because previous studies had suggested that physician's empathy may reduce with clinical trainings, in this study we decided to measure the empathy score among medical students. This is a cross-sectional study conducted on medical students in the first to seventh years of their studies at Shiraz medical school (south of Iran) in 2010. We designed new Iranian version questionnaire of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy. Sample size was 260 students and the results were analyzed in SPSS, version 11.5 (statistical tests such as descriptive methods, t-test, and ANOVA) and p<005 was considered as the significant level. The empathy score decreased with increase in the students' age (p=0.001) and educational level (p=0.030). The overall rate of empathy score in basic science level (65.5±0.84) was more than that in the clinical level (55.5±1.78). The lowest empathy score was seen in the seventh year students (55.51) and the highest was in the first year students (65.50). Female students had higher mean empathy score (65.53) while it was 59.02 in the male students. In general, medical students in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences had low empathy level and this may be a cause for concern; as such we suggest a possible inclusion of courses on empathy in the curriculum.