A systematic review of the association between appliance-induced labial movement of mandibular incisors and gingival recession.

Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Australian orthodontic journal (Impact Factor: 0.43). 05/2011; 27(1):33-9.
Source: PubMed


To determine if an association exists between appliance-induced labial movement of mandibular incisors and gingival recession.
Electronic databases were searched for studies with the terms: 'incisor', 'incisor proclination', 'tooth movement', 'orthodontic tooth movement', 'gingival recession' and 'orthodontic appliance'. The original articles and abstracts that met the initial inclusion criteria were retrieved, and their references hand searched for possible articles missed by the database searches. Inclusion criteria included human studies that suggested a link between labial movement of lower incisors produced by orthodontic treatment and gingival recession. Exclusion criteria included significant intrusion or extrusion of the mandibular incisors, periodontal disease, subjects taking medication that affects gingival health and subjects with systematic diseases.
Seven articles fulfilled the selection criteria. Gingival recession after labial movement of lower incisors was assessed on dental casts, intra-oral slides, lateral cephalograms and gingival examination. The articles were analysed to determine the impact of their treatment methodology on the outcomes.
No association between appliance-induced labial movement of mandibular incisors and gingival recession was found. Factors that may lead to gingival recession after orthodontic tipping and/or translation movement were identified as a reduced thickness of the free gingival margin, a narrow mandibular symphysis, inadequate plaque control and aggressive tooth brushing.

89 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dieser Artikel gibt einen Überblick über Klassifikation, Ätiologie und Risikofaktoren von gingivalen Rezessionen. Des Weiteren werden prä- und postoperatives Management der Patienten, Indikationsstellungen zur Rezessionsdeckung und Einflussfaktoren, die das Operationsergebnis beeinflussen, diskutiert. Der Schwerpunkt liegt auf der präoperativen Phase und dem Erkennen von Ursachen, die zur Ausbildung von gingivalen Rezessionen führen können.
    Stomatologie 03/2013; 110(1-2). DOI:10.1007/s00715-012-0196-7
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To predict lower incisor proclination from initial cephalometric values in Class II division 1 patients treated in phase I with the Xbow appliance. Two hundred forty-nine mild to moderate Class II division 1 patients treated with the Xbow appliance as a phase I treatment were considered. Patients were in late mixed dentition or early permanent dentition. Commonly used cephalometric variables at T1 (before treatment) were used to predict lower incisor proclination after Xbow treatment (T2). A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed. The four extracted PCA components were skeletal component, incisal distance, anterior facial projection, and maxillo-mandibular relation. Thereafter, a multiple linear regression analysis (MLRA) was performed using the four extracted PCA components at T1 as predictor variables, and lower incisor inclination relative to the mandibular plane (L1-MP) at T2 as the dependent variable. The mean L1-MP at T1 was 95.46 degrees and the mean L1-MP at T2 was 98.51 degrees, resulting in a mean difference of 3.04 degrees. Only incisal distance and maxillo-mandibular relation PCA components had significance (P < .05) according to the MLRA. The overall model gave an adjusted R2 value (coefficient of determination) of 0.091. The best prediction model could account for only 9% of the total variability. Using common cephalometric variables at T1, average lower incisor proclination from Xbow treatment cannot be predicted in a clinically meaningful way.
    The Angle Orthodontist 10/2011; 82(3):472-9. DOI:10.2319/072311-465.1 · 1.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To compare the changes in incisor inclination between two compliance-free Class II correction protocols for the treatment of mild to moderate Class II malocclusions. Materials and methods: Among Class II malocclusion patients a total of 38 consecutive patients treated with the Xbow appliance and later with full brackets (XB) were compared to 36 consecutive patients treated with Forsus connected to the archwire while on full brackets (FO). Evaluated cephalometric variables were overjet, overbite, skeletal Class II, lower incisor inclination, and upper incisor inclination. Factors that were analyzed were gender, treatment type, age at start of treatment (T1), and treatment length. Independent t-tests, χ(2), multiple analysis of variance, and Pearson correlations were applied. Results: No differences in incisor inclination between both treatment protocols were identified. At T1 no statistical difference for any cephalometric variable was demonstrated with regard to gender and treatment type. Gender was also not associated with a different treatment time or age at T1. The mean treatment time was 24.2 months for XB and 30.2 months for the FO group (P = .037). XB patients averaged 10 fewer months of fixed edgewise appliances compared to FO patients. Neither gender nor treatment type had any influence on the changes of the evaluated dependent variables between T1 and the end of treatment. Lower incisors proclined more the longer the treatment (P = .005). Both overjet and upper incisor inclination were affected by age at T1 (P = .001 and P = .014, respectively). Conclusions: Both compliance-free Class II correction protocols for the treatment of mild to moderate Class II malocclusions appear to generate the same amount of incisor inclination. Large variability was identified.
    The Angle Orthodontist 10/2012; 83(3). DOI:10.2319/062712-528.1 · 1.23 Impact Factor
Show more

Tehnia Aziz