Temporal Trends in the Prevalence of Diabetic Kidney Disease in the United States

Kidney Research Institute and Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 06/2011; 305(24):2532-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.861
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Diabetes is the leading cause of kidney disease in the developed world. Over time, the prevalence of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) may increase due to the expanding size of the diabetes population or decrease due to the implementation of diabetes therapies.
To define temporal changes in DKD prevalence in the United States.
Cross-sectional analyses of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) from 1988-1994 (N = 15,073), NHANES 1999-2004 (N = 13,045), and NHANES 2005-2008 (N = 9588). Participants with diabetes were defined by levels of hemoglobin A(1c) of 6.5% or greater, use of glucose-lowering medications, or both (n = 1431 in NHANES III; n = 1443 in NHANES 1999-2004; n = 1280 in NHANES 2005-2008).
Diabetic kidney disease was defined as diabetes with albuminuria (ratio of urine albumin to creatinine ≥30 mg/g), impaired glomerular filtration rate (<60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula), or both. Prevalence of albuminuria was adjusted to estimate persistent albuminuria.
The prevalence of DKD in the US population was 2.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8%-2.6%) in NHANES III, 2.8% (95% CI, 2.4%-3.1%) in NHANES 1999-2004, and 3.3% (95% CI, 2.8%-3.7%) in NHANES 2005-2008 (P <.001 for trend). The prevalence of DKD increased in direct proportion to the prevalence of diabetes, without a change in the prevalence of DKD among those with diabetes. Among persons with diabetes, use of glucose-lowering medications increased from 56.2% (95% CI, 52.1%-60.4%) in NHANES III to 74.2% (95% CI, 70.4%-78.0%) in NHANES 2005-2008 (P <.001); use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors increased from 11.2% (95% CI, 9.0%-13.4%) to 40.6% (95% CI, 37.2%-43.9%), respectively (P <.001); the prevalence of impaired glomerular filtration rate increased from 14.9% (95% CI, 12.1%-17.8%) to 17.7% (95% CI, 15.2%-20.2%), respectively (P = .03); and the prevalence of albuminuria decreased from 27.3% (95% CI, 22.0%-32.7%) to 23.7% (95% CI, 19.3%-28.0%), respectively, but this was not statistically significant (P = .07).
Prevalence of DKD in the United States increased from 1988 to 2008 in proportion to the prevalence of diabetes. Among persons with diabetes, prevalence of DKD was stable despite increased use of glucose-lowering medications and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease and is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Dietary omega-3 fatty acid (FA) has cardioprotective effect and is associated with a slower deterioration of albumin excretion in patients with diabetic nephropathy. In this study, we evaluated the effect of omega-3 FA on proteinuria in diabetic nephropathy patients who are controlling blood pressure (BP) with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB). In addition, we identified changes in erythrocyte membrane FA contents. A total of 19 patients who were treated with ACEi or ARB for at least 6 months were treated for 12 weeks with omega-3 FA (Omacor, 3 g/day) or a control treatment (olive oil, 3 g/day). Proteinuria levels were unchanged after 12 weeks compared with baseline values in both groups. The erythrocyte membrane contents of omega-3 FA and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) were significantly increased, and oleic acid, arachidonic acid : EPA ratio, and omega-6 : omega-3 FA ratio were significantly decreased after 12 weeks compared with the baseline values in the omega-3 FA group. Although omega-3 FA did not appear to alter proteinuria, erythrocyte membrane FA contents, including oleic acid, were altered by omega-3 FA supplementation.
    International Journal of Endocrinology 01/2015; 2015:1-8. DOI:10.1155/2015/208121 · 1.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In some countries, diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is responsible for half of all new patients requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). Understanding the relationship between early and later stages of DKD is important as it is a preventable cause of renal failure. This review aims to establish the trends in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to diabetes in the United Kingdom as the first step in this understanding. Using annual reports from the UK Renal Registry, we summarise the presentation, incidence, prevalence and survival of ESRD patients with diabetes over the last 10-15 years. Between 1995 and 2009, initiation of RRT in diabetes patients increased from 12.3 to 27.6 patients per million population (pmp). These rates are approximately five times less than those of Caucasians in the United States suggesting fundamental differences in early DKD management. Survival of diabetic patients on dialysis has improved such that prevalent numbers on RRT increased from 47 to 117 pmp in a 12-year period. A longer time to prepare patients for RRT is strongly related with better outcomes. In 2002, 23% of all patients with diabetic nephropathy were referred late, within 90 days of RRT start; by 2009, this figure had fallen to 11.2%. Access to renal transplantation, the best form of RRT, has improved with almost 12.5% of new transplants occurring in patients with diabetes compared to 8.3% in 1997. End Stage DKD is more extensively and better treated now than in the late 1990 s and coincides with a time of rapid expansion of UK renal services. More diabetes patients start RRT, patients are referred earlier and survive longer. The prevalence of end-stage DKD is 2.5 times what it was just over 10 years ago. However, across the United Kingdom, there still exists variation in the incidence and outcomes of end-stage DKD. That these figures have grown so much but are still dwarfed by other countries' burden of DKD merits further research. Further prevention of DKD is achievable for the United Kingdom and particularly critical for developing nations who can least afford the expensive 'option' of RRT.
    Journal of Renal Care 02/2012; 38 Suppl 1:12-22. DOI:10.1111/j.1755-6686.2012.00273.x
  • Source


Available from