Article

Treating Bugs with Bugs: The Role of Probiotics as Adjunctive Therapy for Helicobacter pylori

Wayne State University, and Harper University Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Annals of Pharmacotherapy (Impact Factor: 2.92). 06/2011; 45(7-8):960-6. DOI: 10.1345/aph.1Q104
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To review the literature on the role of probiotics as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infections.
Literature was accessed through MEDLINE (1966-March 2011) using the terms H. pylori, probiotic, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Saccharomyces, Bacillus clausii, and Propionibacterium. Article references were hand-searched for additional relevant articles and abstracts.
All English-language articles published in full were evaluated. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials assessing the use of probiotics combined with standard eradication therapy of H. pylori infection in adults were included in the review.
Various probiotics, including Lactobacillus spp., Saccharomyces spp., Bifidobacterium spp., and B. clausii, reduce adverse effects such as nausea, taste disturbance, diarrhea, and epigastric pain, and increase tolerability of H. pylori eradication therapy. Based on the studies reviewed, probiotics do not affect H. pylori eradication rates.
Probiotics may be beneficial in reducing adverse effects and increasing tolerability of H. pylori eradication regimens. They may especially be helpful in patients with recurrent H. pylori infection and a history of gastrointestinal adverse effects with antibiotics. Pharmacists can play an important role in educating patients regarding probiotic use during H. pylori eradication therapy.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Sheila Wilhelm, Oct 16, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
216 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objetivo Motivado pelo conhecimento cada vez maior da associação entre o microbioma intestinal e a saúde humana, o interesse nos probióticos vem crescendo cada vez mais. Os autores visaram analisar a última literatura a respeito dos probióticos, de definições a benefícios clínicos com ênfase nas crianças. Fontes Foi analisada a literatura relevante de pesquisas do PubMed, do CINAHL e dos últimos consensos. Resumo dos achados Apesar de um equilíbrio no microbioma estar relacionado à saúde, um desequilíbrio no microbioma ou disbiose está relacionado a vários problemas de saúde no trato gastrointestinal, como diarreia e doença inflamatória intestinal, e fora do trato gastrointestinal, como obesidade e alergia. Nesse contexto, a regulamentação rigorosa dos probióticos a alegações de saúde é urgente, pois a grande maioria desses produtos é comercializada como alimentação (suplementos), alegando benefícios à saúde que frequentemente não são comprovados com evidências clinicamente relevantes. As principais indicações de probióticos são feitas na área da prevenção e tratamento de doenças gastrointestinais, porém mais dados têm sido disponibilizados a respeito de indicações extraintestinais. Pelo menos dois ensaios clínicos controlados e randomizados publicados com o probiótico comercializado na indicação declarada são a condição mínima antes de uma afirmação poder ser mantida. Atualmente, o Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG e Saccharomyces boulardii são as melhores cepas estudadas. Apesar de efeitos adversos terem sido esporadicamente relatados, os probióticos podem ser considerados seguros. Conclusões Apesar de a regulamentação estar aumentando, ainda são necessárias definições mais rigorosas. As evidências de benefícios clínicos estão aumentando, apesar de ainda ausentes em várias áreas. O uso inadequado e a utilização de produtos não validados constituem possíveis desvantagens.
    Jornal de Pediatria 10/2014; 91(1). DOI:10.1016/j.jped.2014.08.005 · 0.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The treatment for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is complex; full effectiveness is rarely achieved and it has many adverse effects. In developing countries, increased resistance to antibiotics and its cost make eradication more difficult. Probiotics can reduce adverse effects and improve the infection treatment efficacy.If the first-line therapy fails a second-line treatment using tetracycline, furazolidone and proton-pump inhibitors has been effective and low cost in Brazil; however it implies in a lot of adverse effects. The aim of this study was to minimize the adverse effects and increase the eradication rate applying the association of a probiotic compound to second-line therapy regimen. METHODS: Patients with peptic ulcer or functional dyspepsia infected by H. pylori were randomized to treatment with the furazolidone, tetracycline and lansoprazole regimen, twice a day for 7 days. In a double-blind study, patients received placebo or a probiotic compound (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bifidum and Streptococcus faecium) in capsules, twice a day for 30 days. A symptom questionnaire was administered in day zero, after completion of antibiotic therapy, after the probiotic use and eight weeks after the end of the treatment. Upper digestive endoscopy, histological assessment, rapid urease test and breath test were performed before and eight weeks after eradication treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and seven patients were enrolled: 21 men with active probiotic and 19 with placebo plus 34 women with active probiotic and 33 with placebo comprising a total of 55 patients with active probiotic and 52 with placebo. Fifty-one patients had peptic ulcer and 56 were diagnosed as functional dyspepsia. The per-protocol eradication rate with active probiotic was 89.8% and with placebo, 85.1% (p = 0.49); per intention to treat, 81.8% and 79.6%, respectively (p = 0.53). The rate of adverse effects at 7 days with the active probiotic was 59.3% and 71.2% with placebo (p = 0.20). At 30 days, it was 44.9% and 60.4%, respectively (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: The use of this probiotic compound compared to placebo in the proposed regimen in Brazilian patients with peptic ulcer or functional dyspepsia showed no significant difference in efficacy or adverse effects.Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN04714018.
    BMC Gastroenterology 03/2013; 13(1):56. DOI:10.1186/1471-230X-13-56 · 2.11 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background To evaluate whether the addition of a probiotic could improve Helicobacter pylori (H.P.) eradication rates and reduce the side effects of treatment in children. Methods Between July 2008 and July 2011 all patients with a clinical, laboratory and endoscopic diagnosis of H.P. positive gastritis referred to our Unit were included in the study. Patients suffering from allergy to any of drugs used in the study, with previous attempts to eradicate H.P. and those who received antibiotics, PPIs or probiotics within 4 weeks were excluded from the present study. Patients were randomized into two therapy regimens (group A and B): both groups received standard triple treatment (omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin) while only group B patients were also given a probiotic (Probinul - Cadigroup). Patients compliance was evaluated at the end of the treatment. Successful eradication was defined as a negative 13 C-urea breath test (C13-ubt) result four weeks after therapy discontinuation. Results A total of 68 histopathologically proven H.P.-infection children (32 male and 36 females) were included in the study. All of the patients in both groups used more than 90% of the therapies and no patients were lost at follow up. All side effects were selflimiting and disappeared once the therapy was terminated. Epigastric pain was observed in 6 (17.6%) group A vs 2 (5.8%) group B patients (P<0.05), nausea in 3 (8.8%) group A vs 1 (2.9%) group B patients (P<0.05); vomiting and diarrhea were observed in 2(5.8%) and 8 (23.5%) group A patients, respectively and never in group B (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of constipation (5.8% in group A and B). Four weeks after the completion of therapy, 56/68 patients (82.3%) tested negative for H.P. on C13-ubt. H.P. was eradicated in 26 patients (76.4%) in group A and in 30 patients (88.2%) in group B. There was no significantly difference in the rate of H.P. eradication between group A and group B (p=0.1), although the success rate for H.P. eradication was higher in group B than in group A. Conclusion The addition of a probiotic formula to triple therapy significantly decreased the frequency of epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea.
    Italian Journal of Pediatrics 10/2012; 38(1):63. DOI:10.1186/1824-7288-38-63