The effects of laser microtexturing of the dental implant collar on crestal bone levels and peri-implant health.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, New Jersey Dental School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants (Impact Factor: 1.91). 01/2011; 26(3):492-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Polished and machined collars have been advocated for dental implants to reduce plaque accumulation and crestal bone loss. More recent research has suggested that a roughened titanium surface promotes osseointegration and connective tissue attachment. The purpose of this research was to compare crestal bone height adjacent to implants with laser-microtextured and machined collars from two different implant systems.
Four implants, two with laser-microtextured collars and two with machined collars, were placed in the anterior mandible to serve as overdenture abutments. They were placed in alternating order, and the distal microtextured- and machined-collar implants were loaded with ball abutments. The mesial implants were left unloaded. The distal implants were immediately loaded with prefabricated dentures. Plaque Index, Bleeding Index, and probing depths (PDs) were measured after 6 and 12 months for the loaded implants. Bone loss for both groups (loaded and unloaded) was evaluated via standardized radiographs.
Plaque and bleeding values were similar for both implant types. The microtextured-collar implants showed shallower PDs (0.36 ± 0.5 mm and 0.43 ± 0.51 mm) than those with machined collars (1.14 ± 0.77 mm and 1.64 ± 0.93 mm; < .05 for 6 and 12 months, respectively). At 6 and 12 months, respectively, the microtextured implants showed less crestal bone loss for both loaded (0.19 ± 0.15 mm and 0.42 ± 0.34 mm) and unloaded groups (0.15 ± 0.15 mm and 0.29 ± 0.20 mm) than the machined implants for both the loaded (0.72 ± 0.5 mm and 1.13 ± 0.61 mm) and unloaded groups (0.29 ± 0.28 mm and 0.55 ± 0.32 mm).
Application of laser-microtextured grooves to the implant collar resulted in shallower PDs and less peri-implant crestal bone loss than that seen around implants with machined collars.

0 0
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the soft tissue response in humans immunologically and histologically after placement of mini-implants coated with or without nano-size hydroxyapatite coatings. Commercially pure (cp) titanium mini-implants (n = 13) or nano-hydroxyapatite-coated ones (n = 12) were randomly placed into partially edentulous jaws. Crevicular fluid was sampled 1 week after placement and subjected to quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis to explore the inflammatory markers. After 8 weeks, implants and surrounding soft and hard tissue were trephined, and undecalcified ground sections were prepared. Inflammatory cell accumulation within a defined region of interest in the soft tissue was quantified histomorphometrically. No statistically significant differences in immunological response to the different implant surfaces were found for IL-6 (p = .438), TGF-β2 (p = .467), MMP-8 (p = .758), CCL-3 (p = .758), IL-8 (p = .771), and IL-1β (0.771). Histomorphometric evaluation presented no statistically significant difference between the two mini-implant surfaces with regards to number of inflammatory cells (p = .669). Nano-hydroxyapatite-coated surfaces in the transmucosal region yielded similar inflammatory response and is suggested to be as biocompatible as commercially pure titanium surfaces.
    Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 08/2013; · 3.82 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It has been shown that thin mucosal tissues may be an important factor in crestal bone loss etiology. Thus, it is possible that mucosal tissue thickening with allogenic membrane might reduce crestal bone loss. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how implants with traditional connection maintain crestal bone level after soft tissue thickening with allogenic membrane. One hundred three patients received 103 internal hex implants of 4.6 mm diameter with regular connection. According to gingiva thickness, patients were assigned into A (thin tissues, n = 34), B (thin, thickened with allogenic membrane, n = 35), and C group (thick tissues, n = 34). Groups A and C had one-stage approach, and in group B, implants were placed in two stages. Radiographic examination was performed after implant placement, 2 months after healing, after restoration, and after 1-year follow-up. Crestal bone loss was calculated medially and distally. Significance was set to 0.05. After 1-year follow-up, implants in group A had 1.65 ± 0.08-mm bone loss mesially and 1.81 ± 0.06 mm distally. Group B had 0.31 ± 0.05 mm mesially and 0.34 ± 0.05 mm distally. C group implants experienced bone loss of 0.44 ± 0.06 mm mesially and 0.47 ± 0.07 mm distally. Differences between A and B, and A and C were significant (p = .000) both mesially and distally, whereas differences between B and C were not significant mesially (p = .166) and distally (p = .255). It can be concluded that thin mucosal tissues may cause early crestal bone loss, but their thickening with allogenic membrane may significantly reduce bone resorption. Implants in naturally thick soft tissues experienced minor bone remodeling.
    Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 09/2013; · 3.82 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Implant-supported dental restorations can be screw-retained, cement-retained, or a combination of both, whereby a metal superstructure is screwed to the implants and crowns are individually cemented to the metal frame. Each treatment modality has advantages and disadvantages. The use of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture technologies for the manufacture of implant superstructures has proved to be advantageous in the quality of materials, precision of the milled superstructures, and passive fit. Maintenance and recall evaluations are an essential component of implant therapy. The longevity of implant restorations is limited by their biological and prosthetic maintenance requirements.
    Dental clinics of North America 01/2014; 58(1):207-25.