Article

Increasing medication error reporting rates while reducing harm through simultaneous cultural and system-level interventions in an intensive care unit

Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1113 Olivia Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA.
BMJ quality & safety (Impact Factor: 3.28). 06/2011; 20(11):914-22. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.047233
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study analyses patterns in reporting rates of medication errors, rates of medication errors with harm, and responses to the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), all in the context of four cultural and three system-level interventions for medication safety in an intensive care unit.
Over a period of 2.5 years (May 2007 to November 2009), seven overlapping interventions to improve medication safety and reporting were implemented: a poster tracking 'days since last medication error resulting in harm', a continuous slideshow showing performance metrics in the staff lounge, multiple didactic curricula, unit-wide emails summarising medication errors, computerised physician order entry, introduction of unit-based pharmacy technicians for medication delivery, and patient safety report form streamlining. The reporting rate of medication errors and errors with harm were analysed over time using statistical process control. SAQ responses were collected annually.
Subsequent to the interventions, the reporting rate of medication errors increased 25%, from an average of 3.16 to 3.95 per 10,000 doses dispensed (p<0.09), while the rate of medication errors resulting in harm decreased 71%, from an average of 0.56 to 0.16 per 10,000 doses dispensed (p<0.01). The SAQ showed improvement in all 13 survey items related to medication safety, five of which were significant (p<0.05).
Actively developing a transparent and positive safety culture at the unit level can improve medication safety. System-level mechanisms to promote medication safety are likely important factors that enable safety culture to translate into better outcomes, but may be independently ineffective in the face of poor safety culture.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Matthew F Niedner, Aug 09, 2015
4 Followers
 · 
172 Views
  • Source
    • "Unclear risk Protection against contamination? Unclear risk Footnotes CBA -controlled before-after studies ITS -interrupted time series analyses Characteristics of excluded studies Abstoss 2011 "
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 01/2006;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Safety and quality improvement are major issues in children's hospitals. Improving pediatric medication safety often takes on a larger role in pediatric units than in adult units due to the larger size differences and dose ranges found in a pediatric intensive care unit. This article reviews the literature and our own experience at the CS Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, to improve medication safety. The issues identified include (1) an effective pediatric medication safety governance structure within a larger hospital, (2) practice standardization strategies for physicians, nurses, and pharmacists, (3) use of pharmacy technicians as unit medication managers, which reduces medication costs and decreases nursing time spent hunting for medications, and (4) methods to improve the safety culture in a pediatric intensive care unit.
    Critical care nursing quarterly 01/2012; 35(1):15-26. DOI:10.1097/CNQ.0b013e31823c25dd
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reporting of adverse clinical events is thought to be an effective method of improving the safety of healthcare. Underreporting of these adverse events is often said to occur with consequence of missing of opportunities to learn from these incidents. A clinical incident can be defined as any occurrence which is not consistent with the routine care of the patient or the routine operation of the institution. To assess the effects of interventions designed to increase clinical incident reporting in healthcare settings. We searched the the following databases: Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO), Social Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index (Web of Knowledge), Healthstar (OVID), INSPEC, DHSS-DATA, SIGLE, ISI Conference Proceedings, Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index (Science), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE). Randomised controlled trials (RCT), controlled before-after studies (CBA) and interrupted time series (ITS) of interventions designed to increase clinical incident reporting in healthcare. At least two review authors assessed the eligibility of potentially relevant studies, extracted the data and assessed the quality of included studies. Four studies (one CBA and three ITS studies) met our inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The CBA study showed a significant improvement in incident reporting rates after the introduction of the new reporting system. Just one of the ITS studies showed a statistically significant improved effectiveness of the new reporting system from nine months. The other two studies reported no statistically significant improvements. Because of the limitations of the studies it is not possible to draw conclusions for clinical practice. Anyone introducing a system into practice should give careful consideration to conducting an evaluation using a robust design.
    Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 01/2012; 8(8):CD005609. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD005609.pub2 · 5.94 Impact Factor
Show more