Exploiting drug-disease relationships for computational drug repositioning.

Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Briefings in Bioinformatics (Impact Factor: 5.3). 06/2011; 12(4):303-11. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbr013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Finding new uses for existing drugs, or drug repositioning, has been used as a strategy for decades to get drugs to more patients. As the ability to measure molecules in high-throughput ways has improved over the past decade, it is logical that such data might be useful for enabling drug repositioning through computational methods. Many computational predictions for new indications have been borne out in cellular model systems, though extensive animal model and clinical trial-based validation are still pending. In this review, we show that computational methods for drug repositioning can be classified in two axes: drug based, where discovery initiates from the chemical perspective, or disease based, where discovery initiates from the clinical perspective of disease or its pathology. Newer algorithms for computational drug repositioning will likely span these two axes, will take advantage of newer types of molecular measurements, and will certainly play a role in reducing the global burden of disease.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A systematic literature review on pharmaceutical companies may be a tool for guiding some procedures of R&D implementation in a department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology. The use of pharmaceutical companies for this specific analysis arises from less variability of standards than healthcare facilities. In this qualitative and quantitative analysis, we focused on three useful areas of implementation, including R&D productivity, commercialization strategies, and expenditures determinants of pharmaceutical companies. Studies and reports of online databases from 1965 to 2014 were reviewed according to specific search terms. Initially, 218 articles and reports were found and examined, but only 91 were considered appropriate and used for further analysis. We identified some suggested implementation strategies relevant for marketing to enhance companies’ own R&D strategies; such as reliability of companies on “sourcing-in” R&D facilities and "think-tank" events. Regardless of the study and of the country, cash flow and profitability always positively influenced R&D expenditure, while sales and firm size did not. We consider that handling R&D determinants should require caution. It seems critical that implementation of R&D systems is directly related with productivity, if it reflects dual embodiment of efficiency and effectiveness. Scrutinizing the determinants of R&D expenditures emphasizes significant factors that are worth to highlight when planning an R&D investment strategy. Although there is no receipt fitting every situation, we think that health care plan makers may find relevant data in this systematic review in creating an initial implementation framework.
    Global journal of health science 12/2014; 7(4):70-82.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Connectivity map data and associated methodologies have become a valuable tool in understanding drug mechanism of action (MOA) and discovering new indications for drugs. One of the key ideas of connectivity map (CMAP) is to measure the connectivity between disease gene expression signatures and compound-induced gene expression profiles. Despite multiple impressive anecdotal validations, only a few systematic evaluations have assessed the accuracy of this aspect of CMAP, and most of these utilize drug-to-drug matching to transfer indications across the two drugs. To assess CMAP methodologies in a more direct setting, namely the power of classifying known drug-disease relationships, we evaluated three CMAP-based methods on their prediction performance against a curated dataset of 890 true drug-indication pairs. The disease signatures were generated using Gene Logic BioExpress™ system and the compound profiles were derived from the Connectivity Map database (CMAP, build 02, The similarity scoring algorithm called eXtreme Sum (XSum) performs better than the standard Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) statistic in terms of the area under curve and can achieve a four-fold enrichment at 0.01 false positive rate level, with AUC = 2.2E-4, P value = 0.0035. Connectivity map can significantly enrich true positive drug-indication pairs given an effective matching algorithm.
    Genome Medicine 01/2014; 6(12):540. · 4.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cancer is a complex and heterogeneous disease. Genetic methods have uncovered thousands of complex tissue-specific mutation-induced effects and identified multiple disease gene targets. Important associations between cancer and other biological entities (eg, genes and drugs) in cancer network, however, are usually scattered in biomedical publications. Systematic analyses of these cancer-specific associations can help highlight the hidden associations between different cancer types and related genes/drugs. In this paper, we proposed a novel network-based computational framework to identify statistically over-expressed subnetwork patterns called network motifs (NMs) in an integrated cancer-specific drug-disease-gene network extracted from Semantic MEDLINE, a database containing extracted associations from MEDLINE abstracts. Eight significant NMs were identified and considered as the backbone of the cancer association network. Each NM corresponds to specific biological meanings. We demonstrated that such approaches will facilitate the formulization of novel cancer research hypotheses, which is critical for translational medicine research and personalized medicine in cancer.
    Cancer informatics 01/2014; 13(Suppl 3):45-51.


Available from
May 27, 2014