Article

Serological memory and long-term protection to novel H1N1 influenza virus after skin vaccination

Department of Microbiology & Immunology and Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
The Journal of Infectious Diseases (Impact Factor: 5.78). 06/2011; 204(4):582-91. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jir094
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A major goal in influenza vaccine development is induction of serological memory and cellular responses to confer long-term protection and limit virus spread after infection. Here, we investigate induction of long-lived immunity against the 2009 H1N1 virus after skin vaccination.
BALB/c mice received a single dose of 5 μg inactivated A/California/04/09 virus via coated metal microneedles (MN) applied to skin or via subcutaneous injection.
MN or subcutaneous vaccination elicited similar serum IgG and hemagglutination inhibition titers and 100% protection against lethal viral challenge 6 weeks after vaccination. Six months after vaccination, the subcutaneous group exhibited a 60% decrease in functional antibody titers and extensive lung inflammation after challenge with 10 × LD(50) of homologous virus. In contrast, the MN group maintained high functional antibody titers and IFN-γ levels, inhibition of viral replication, and no signs of lung inflammation after challenge. MN vaccination conferred complete protection against lethal challenge, whereas subcutaneous vaccination induced only partial protection. These findings were further supported by high numbers of bone marrow plasma cells and spleen antibody-secreting cells detected in the MN group.
A single skin vaccination with MN induced potent long-lived immunity and improved protection against the 2009 H1N1 influenza virus, compared with subcutaneous injection.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Ioanna Skountzou, Jul 16, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
166 Views
  • Source
    • "vaccines or drugs into the epidermis and dermis of the skin (Fig. 1), rather than intramuscularly, the typical route. Intradermal delivery of influenza vaccine by microneedles can lead to longer-lasting and more-robust antibody responses than intramuscular vaccination in mice, suggesting the possibility of improved efficacy [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]. Clinical studies comparing intramuscular delivery of influenza vaccine to intradermal delivery in liquid form through hollow minineedles and microneedles have shown a superior immune response in the elderly when an equal dose is administered intradermally, and equivalent immune responses in younger adults with administration of a reduced dose [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Simple and efficacious delivery methods for influenza vaccines are needed to improve health outcomes and manage possible pandemics both in the United States and globally. One approach to meeting these needs is the microneedle patch (MNP), a small array of micron-scale needles that is applied to the skin like a bandage. To inform additional technical developments and the eventual introduction of MNPs for influenza vaccination, we interviewed key opinion leaders in the United States for insights into the opportunities and challenges associated with this technology, particularly its potential for self-administration. All interviewees expressed high support for administration of influenza vaccine in MNPs by health care providers and for self-administration in groups supervised by a provider. Self-administration via prescription and over-the-counter purchase of MNPs received lower levels of support. Interviewees also highlighted priorities that should be considered in the ongoing development of an influenza vaccine MNP, such as confirming it to be as efficacious as existing methods of influenza vaccine delivery and ensuring safety for self-administration. For patient and health care provider acceptability, important attributes are ease of use, short wear times, and an easily accessible application site. Stakeholders agreed that using MNPs can help increase coverage, facilitate easy and safe delivery, reduce the cost of vaccination, and decrease the global morbidity and mortality associated with influenza. Another opportunity for this delivery method is the potential for self-administration. The prospect of reduced provider training requirements, increased thermostability, and high patient and provider acceptability makes it an attractive option for use in remote and low-resource settings worldwide. However, in addition to the technological challenges associated with producing the patch, developers must be mindful of cost considerations and key product attributes or requirements, such as usability, wear time, and proper disposal, that can affect how the product will be received in the marketplace. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Vaccine 04/2015; 368. DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.03.062 · 3.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In order to compare the immunogenicity and safety of different doses of trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) administered intradermallly (ID) with those evoked by a full dose of intramuscular (IM) virosomal-adjuvanted influenza vaccine (VA-TIV), 112 previously primed healthy children aged ≥ 3 years were randomised to receive 9 μg or 15 μg of each strain of ID-TIV, or a full IM dose (15 μg of each strain) of VA-TIV. The A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 seroconversion and seroprotection rates were ≥ 90% and geometric mean titres (GMTs) increased 3.2-14.9 times without any statistically significant between-group differences; however, the seroconversion and seroprotection rates against the B strain were significantly higher in the children receiving either ID-TIV dose (p<0.05) without any differences between them. GMT against B virus was significantly higher in the children receiving the highest dose (p<0.05). Local reactions were significantly more common among the children receiving either ID-TIV dose (p<0.05), but systemic reactions were relatively uncommon in all three groups. Our findings suggest that ID-TIV with 15 μg of each viral antigen can confer a significant better protection against influenza than that obtained with the same dose of IM TIV in already primed children aged ≥ 3 years with an acceptable safety profile. The lower dose of ID-TIV needs further evaluation to analyze persistence of protection.
    Vaccine 08/2011; 29(44):7606-10. DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.021 · 3.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Microneedle patches (MN) provide a novel method of vaccine delivery to the skin with the objective of targeting the large network of resident antigen-presenting cells to induce an efficient immune response. Our previous reports demonstrated that cutaneous delivery of inactivated influenza virus-coated MN to mice protects against lethal infection. Protection is correlated with sustained levels of anti-influenza virus serum antibodies, hemagglutination inhibition titers, and robust cellular responses that are often stronger than those generated by intramuscular vaccination. Here we dissect the early events occurring in murine skin after microneedle delivery of inactivated influenza virus. We demonstrate correlation of immunization against influenza virus with a local increase of cytokines important for recruitment of neutrophils, monocytes and dendritic cells at the site of immunization. We also observed prolonged antigen deposition, and migration of matured dendritic cells bearing influenza virus antigen from the skin. IMPORTANCE: The immunological mechanisms by which MN vaccination confers protective immunity are not well understood. The present study provides a first analysis of the early immune events after microneedle-based vaccination.
    mBio 02/2012; 3(2):e00012-12. DOI:10.1128/mBio.00012-12 · 6.88 Impact Factor
Show more