Sustained Benefits from Ranibizumab for Macular Edema Following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 12-Month Outcomes of a Phase III Study
ABSTRACT Assess 12-month efficacy and safety of intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab in patients with macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
Prospective, randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter trial.
A total of 397 patients with macular edema after BRVO.
Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 6 monthly injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab or sham injections. After 6 months, all patients with study eye best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤20/40 or central subfield thickness ≥250 μm were to receive ranibizumab. Patients could receive rescue laser treatment once during the treatment period and once during the observation period if criteria were met.
The main efficacy outcome reported is mean change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 12. Additional visual and anatomic parameters were assessed.
Mean (95% confidence interval) change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 12 was 16.4 (14.5-18.4) and 18.3 (15.8-20.9) in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg groups, respectively, and 12.1 (9.6-14.6) in the sham/0.5 mg group (P<0.01, each ranibizumab group vs. sham/0.5 mg). The percentage of patients who gained ≥15 letters from baseline BCVA at month 12 was 56.0% and 60.3% in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg groups, respectively, and 43.9% in the sham/0.5 mg group. On average, there was a marked reduction in central foveal thickness (CFT) after the first as-needed injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab in the sham/0.5 mg group, which was sustained through month 12. No new ocular or nonocular safety events were identified.
At month 12, treatment with ranibizumab as needed during months 6-11 maintained, on average, the benefits achieved by 6 monthly ranibizumab injections in patients with macular edema after BRVO, with low rates of ocular and nonocular safety events. In the sham/0.5 mg group, treatment with ranibizumab as needed for 6 months resulted in rapid reduction in CFT to a similar level as that in the 0.3 mg ranibizumab treatment group and an improvement in BCVA, but not to the extent of that in the 2 ranibizumab groups. Intraocular injections of ranibizumab provide an effective treatment for macular edema after BRVO.
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
- SourceAvailable from: PubMed Central
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "Thus, there is strong rationale for using VEGF antagonists to treat macular edema following RVO. There have been two large, well-designed (prospective, randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter), phase III trials in patients with macular edema following CRVO   or BRVO  . "
ABSTRACT: We review articles describing intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drug trials, while discussing the mechanisms of the action of anti-VEGF antibodies, and also evaluating their outcomes. Intraocular injections of anti-VEGF drug are considered to be an effective treatment for macular edema after retinal vein occlusion, however, recurrent/persistent edema is common. The recent reports may lead to a shift in treatment paradigm for DME, from laser photocoagulation, to newer approaches using anti-VEGF drugs. There have been several well-publicized prospective, randomized studies that demonstrated the efficacy of intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs for patients with AMD. Adjuvant bevacizumab for neovascular glaucoma may prevent further PAS formation, and it is likely to open up a therapeutic window for a panretinal photocoagulation and trabeculectomy. Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) results in a substantial decrease in bleeding from the retinal vessels or new vessels during a standard vitrectomy. IVB has also been reported to be effective for inducing the regression of new vessels in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The use of bevacizumab in stage 4 or 5 retinopahty of permaturity (ROP) is to reduce the plus sign to help reduce hemorrhage during the subsequent vitrectomy. Some authors reported cases of resolution of stage 4 A ROP after bevacizumab injection.Journal of Ophthalmology 01/2012; 2012(2090-004X):852183. DOI:10.1155/2012/852183 · 1.94 Impact Factor
- Spektrum der Augenheilkunde 06/2012; 27(3). DOI:10.1007/s00717-012-0128-3 · 0.18 Impact Factor
Article: Drug-induced uveitis[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Purpose of reviewAlthough more than 50% of all uveitis cases have no identifiable cause, certain medications can cause ocular inflammation and are often overlooked. Drug-induced ocular inflammation has increased in frequency with the advent of new bisphosphonates, antitumor necrosis factor biologic agents, and intravitreal triamcinolone and antivascular endothelial growth factor medications. Identification of these inciting drugs will simplify work-up and management of patients with uveitis and improve visual outcomes.Recent findingsThis review briefly focuses on the drugs that have long been known to be strongly associated with uveitis and emphasize new observations about these associations. It will also highlight the newest medications associated with uveitis and scleritis. The strength of the association between each drug and uveitis will be quantified and categorized into definite, probable, possible, and unlikely causes of uveitis utilizing Naranjo's classification criteria.SummaryDrug-induced uveitis has become increasingly recognized in association with a number of commonly used systemic, intraocular, and topical medications. A detailed history is often all that is needed to identify these important, often overlooked, and readily curable causes of uveitis. Most cases of drug-induced uveitis respond promptly to discontinuation of the suspected agent in conjunction with topical corticosteroid and cycloplegic therapy.03/2013; 3(1). DOI:10.1186/1869-5760-3-43