Epidemiology of facial fracture injuries.

Department of Developmental Biology, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (Impact Factor: 1.58). 06/2011; 69(10):2613-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.057
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Injuries resulting from accidents are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity. The objective of this study was to present epidemiologic estimates of hospital-based emergency department (ED) visits for facial fractures in the United States.
The Nationwide Emergency Department Sample for 2007 was used. All ED visits with facial fractures were selected. Demographic characteristics of these ED visits, causes of injuries, presence of concomitant injuries, and resource use in hospitals were examined. All estimates were projected to national levels and each ED visit was the unit of analysis.
During 2007 in the United States, 407,167 ED visits concerned a facial fracture. Patients' average age for each ED visit was 37.9 years. Sixty-eight percent of all ED visits concerned male patients, and 85,759 ED visits resulted in further treatment in the same hospital. Three hundred fourteen patients died in EDs, and 2,717 died during hospitalization. Mean charge per each ED visit was $3,192. Total United States ED charges were close to $1 billion. Mean hospitalization charges (ED and inpatient charges) amounted to $62,414. Mean length of stay was 6.23 days, and total hospitalization time in the entire United States was 534,322 days. Frequently reported causes of injuries included assaults (37% of all ED visits), falls (24.6%), and motor vehicle accidents (12.1%).
The management of maxillofacial fractures in EDs across the United States uses considerable resources. The public health impact of facial fractures is highlighted in the present study.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The precise computed tomography-based calculation of the size of an orbital floor (OF) fracture defect is tedious and time-consuming. The aims of this study were to evaluate the accuracy of simple, rapid methods of calculating OF fracture defect size and to determine their suitability for clinical use. A retrospective review of the electronic medical records of patients with OF fractures presenting to Baylor Scott and White Hospital between October 2009 and April 2013 was performed. True OF defect sizes (the outcome variable) were calculated using a previously validated formula, on the basis of measurements obtained from coronally reformatted thin (<3-mm) axial computed tomographic images. Estimated OF defect sizes (the predictor variable) were calculated using geometric area formulas, assuming that the defect approximated the shape of an ellipse, circle, square, or rectangle on the basis of measurements obtained from coronal and sagittal computed tomographic images. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values in declaring a defect critical were determined for each method. Ninety-nine patients with OF fractures were identified (69 men, 30 women; mean age = 46.9 years); 55 patients had a true OF defects of critical (≥2 cm(2)) or greater size. Geometric formulas showed ranges of accuracy (0.76 to 0.93), sensitivity (0.62 to 1.0), and specificity (0.63 to 0.91). The accuracy of defect size approximation using the area of an ellipse was highest. The geometric formulas estimated OF defect area with good but, in the authors' opinion, clinically unacceptable accuracy. Although highly sensitive, the formulas lacked specificity and tended to overestimate true defect sizes in most cases. Using rapid, simple geometric methods to assess the sizes of OF defects may lead to inappropriate surgical decisions. Thus, the most accurate estimation of OF defect size still requires the calculation of average defect length from coronal computed tomographic images, knowledge of slice thickness, and knowledge of the number of slices involved. Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 01/2015; 73(1):112-6. · 1.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: How to cite the article: Ramalingam S. Role of maxillofacial trauma scoring systems in determining the economic burden to maxillofacial trauma patients in India. J Int Oral Health 2015;7(3):1-6. Abstract: Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between severity of maxillofacial injuries determined by trauma scoring systems and its economic burden to patients in terms of cost and duration of hospitalization. Materials and Methods: Following ethical approval a retrospective chart review was undertaken at Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital to identify patients admitted with maxillofacial injuries between January 2006 and December 2008. Patients with incomplete records, associated injuries, debilitating systemic diseases and patients treated under local anesthesia were excluded. Details regarding the nature and severity of injury and treatment were recorded in addition to the total treatment cost and duration of hospitalization. Maxillofacial injury severity was scored using maxillofacial injury severity score (MFISS) and facial injury severity scale (FISS). The MFISS and FISS scores were correlated with two surrogate markers of the economic burden namely cost and duration of hospitalization. Results: A total of 162 patients with maxillofacial injuries were identified (108 males, 54 females; mean age = 32.4 years). Road traffic accidents were the cause of injury in 114 patients (70.4%) and only 29 patients (17.9%) had medical insurance coverage. The mean MFISS and FISS scores were 14.04 (standard deviation [SD] = 9.19; range = 3-42) and 4.40 (SD = 3.17; range = 1-14), respectively. The mean cost and duration of hospitalization of the patients were Indian rupees (INR) 13877.28 (SD = 8252.59; range = INR 5250-42960) and 4.12 days (SD = 1.5; range = 2-8 days) respectively. Pearson's correlation between the MFISS and FISS scores and the cost and duration of hospitalization, revealed statistically significant correlations (MFISS vs. cost-R = 0.862, P < 0.001; MFISS vs. duration-R = 0.828, P < 0.01; FISS vs. cost-R = 0.845, P < 0.01; FISS vs. duration-R = 0.819, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, maxillofacial injury severity measured by MFISS and FISS scores are predictable indicators of the economic burden to the patients.
    Journal of International Oral health. 01/2015; 7(3).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to analyse the demographics, causes and characteristics of maxillofacial fractures managed at several European departments of oral and maxillofacial surgery over one year. The following data were recorded: gender, age, aetiology, site of facial fractures, facial injury severity score, timing of intervention, length of hospital stay. Data for a total of 3396 patients (2655 males and 741 females) with 4155 fractures were recorded. The mean age differed from country to country, ranging between 29.9 and 43.9 years. Overall, the most frequent cause of injury was assault, which accounted for the injuries of 1309 patients; assaults and falls alternated as the most important aetiological factor in the various centres. The most frequently observed fracture involved the mandible with 1743 fractures, followed by orbital-zygomatic-maxillary (OZM) fractures. Condylar fractures were the most commonly observed mandibular fracture. The results of the EURMAT collaboration confirm the changing trend in maxillofacial trauma epidemiology in Europe, with trauma cases caused by assaults and falls now outnumbering those due to road traffic accidents. The progressive ageing of the European population, in addition to strict road and work legislation may have been responsible for this change. Men are still the most frequent victims of maxillofacial injuries. Copyright © 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Available from
Sep 23, 2014