Article

Use of a Dose-dependent Follow-up Protocol and Mechanisms to Reduce Patients and Staff Radiation Exposure in Congenital and Structural Interventions

The Heart Center, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Impact Factor: 2.4). 07/2011; 78(1):136-42. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Increasingly complex structural/congenital cardiac interventions require efforts at reducing patient/staff radiation exposure. Standard follow-up protocols are often inadequate in detecting all patients that may have sustained radiation burns.
Single-center retrospective chart review divided into four intervals. Phase 1 (07/07-06/08, 413 procedures (proc)): follow-up based on fluoroscopy time only; frame rate for digital acquisition (DA) 30 fps, and fluoroscopy (FL) 30 fps. Dose-based follow-up was used for phase 2-4. Phase 2 (07/08-08/09, 458 proc): DA: 30 fps, FL: 15 fps. Phase 3 (09/09-06/10, 350 proc): DA: 15-30 fps, FL: 15 fps, use of added radiation protection drape. Phase 4 (07/10-10/10, 89 proc): DA: 15-30 fps, FL: 15 fps, superior noise reduction filter (SNRF) with high-quality fluoro-record capabilities.
There was a significant reduction in the median cumulative air kerma between the four study periods (710 mGy vs. 566 mGy vs. 498 mGy vs. 241 mGy, P < 0.001), even though the overall fluoroscopy times remained very similar (25 min vs. 26 min vs. 26 min vs. 23 min, P = 0.957). There was a trend towards lower physician radiation exposure over the four study periods (137 mrem vs. 126 mrem vs. 108 mrem vs. 59 mrem, P = 0.15). Fifteen patients with radiation burns were identified during the study period. When changing to a dose-based follow-up protocol (phase 1 vs. phase 2), there was a significant increase in the incidence of detected radiation burns (0.5% vs. 2%, P = 0.04).
Dose-based follow-up protocols are superior in detecting radiation burns when compared to fluoroscopy time-based protocols. Frame rate reduction of fluoroscopy and cine acquisition and use of modified imaging equipment can achieve a significant reduction to patient/staff exposure.

0 Followers
 · 
164 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pediatric catheterization exposes patients to varying radiation doses. Concerns over the effects of X-ray radiation dose on the patient population have increased in recent years. This study aims at quantifying the patient radiation dose reduction after the introduction of an X-ray imaging technology using advanced real time image noise reduction algorithms and optimized acquisition chain for fluoroscopy and exposure in a pediatric and adult population with congenital heart disease.
    03/2015; 6:101-109. DOI:10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.01.007
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives We examine normalized air Kerma area product (P-KA) by body weight (P-KA/BW) as a reference value of radiation dose and benchmark P-KA/BW in pediatric laboratories using a multicenter registry database. Background Reduction of radiation dose is an important quality improvement task in pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratories. Physicians need to agree on a standard method of reporting radiation dose that would allow comparisons to be made between operators and institutions. Methods This was a multicenter observational study of radiation dose in pediatric laboratories. Patient demographic, procedural and radiation data including fluoroscopic time and P-KA (mu Gy m(2)) were analyzed. P-KA/BW was obtained by indexing P-KA to body weight. ResultsA total of 8,267 pediatric catheterization procedures (age <18 years) were included from 16 institutions. The procedures consisted of diagnostic (n=2,827), transplant right ventricular (RV) biopsy (n=1,172), and interventional catheterizations (n=4268). P-KA correlated with body weight better than with age and best correlated with weight-fluoroscopic time product. P-KA/BW showed consistent values across pediatric ages. Interventional catheterizations had the highest P-KA/BW (50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles: 72, 151, and 281 Gy m(2)/kg), followed by diagnostic (59, 105, and 175 Gy m(2)/kg) and transplant RV biopsy (27, 79, and 114 Gy m(2)/kg). ConclusionP(KA)/BW appeared to be the most reliable standard to report radiation dose across all procedure types and patient age. We recommend P-KA/BW to be used as the standard unit in documenting radiation usage in pediatric laboratories and can be used to evaluate strategies to lower radiation dosage in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterizations. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 11/2014; 84(5). DOI:10.1002/ccd.25467 · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives The aim of this study was to define age-stratified, procedure-specific benchmark radiation dose levels during interventional catheterization for congenital heart disease. Background There is a paucity of published literature with regard to radiation dose levels during catheterization for congenital heart disease. Obtaining benchmark radiation data is essential for assessing the impact of quality improvement initiatives for radiation safety. Methods Data were obtained retrospectively from 7 laboratories participating in the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes collaborative. Total air kerma, dose area product, and total fluoroscopy time were obtained for the following procedures: 1) patent ductus arteriosus closure; 2) atrial septal defect closure; 3) pulmonary valvuloplasty; 4) aortic valvuloplasty; 5) treatment of coarctation of aorta; and 6) transcatheter pulmonary valve placement. Results Between January 2009 and July 2013, 2,713 cases were identified. Radiation dose benchmarks are presented including median, 75th percentile, and 95th percentile. Radiation doses varied widely between age groups and procedure types. Radiation exposure was lowest in patent ductus arteriosus closure and highest in transcatheter pulmonary valve placement. Total fluoroscopy time was a poor marker of radiation exposure and did not correlate well with total air kerma and dose area product. Conclusions This study presents age-stratified radiation dose values for 6 common congenital heart interventional catheterization procedures. Fluoroscopy time alone is not an adequate measure for monitoring radiation exposure. These values will be used as baseline for measuring the effectiveness of future quality improvement activities by the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes collaborative.
    JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 09/2014; 7(9):1060–1069. DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.013 · 7.44 Impact Factor