Article

Negative aspects of close relationships as a predictor of increased body mass index and waist circumference: the Whitehall II study

Institute of Work, Health, and Organisations, School of Community Health Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.23). 06/2011; 101(8):1474-80. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300115
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We investigated whether exposure to negative aspects of close relationships was associated with subsequent increase in body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference.
Data came from a prospective cohort study (Whitehall II) of 9425 civil servants aged 35 to 55 years at baseline (phase 1: 1985-1988). We assessed negative aspects of close relationships with the Close Persons Questionnaire (range 0-12) at phases 1 and 2 (1989-1990). We measured BMI and waist circumference at phases 3 (1991-1994) and 5 (1997-1999). Covariates at phase 1 included gender, age, marital status, ethnicity, BMI, employment grade, smoking, physical activity, fruit and vegetable consumption, and common mental disorder.
After adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics and health behaviors, participants with higher exposure to negative aspects of close relationships had a higher likelihood of a 10% or greater increase in BMI and waist circumference (odds ratios per 1-unit increase 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) =1.02, 1.14; P = .007] and 1.09 [CI = 1.04, 1.14; P ≤ .001], respectively) as well as a transition from the overweight (25 ≤ BMI  < 30) to the obese (BMI  ≥ 0) category.
Adverse social relationships may contribute to weight gain.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Archana Singh-Manoux, Aug 23, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
156 Views
  • Source
    • "Torres and Nowson (2007) argue that chronic stress leads to consuming foods high in sugar and fat, and a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies shows that depression generally leads to weight gain (Blaine, 2008). Using the Whitehall II data, others (Kouvonen et al., 2011) have shown that the negative aspects of marriage result in weight gain. All of this suggests that spousal lost should raise BMI. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A large body of literature argues that marriage promotes health and increases longevity. But do these benefits extend to maintaining a healthy body weight, as the economic theory of health investment suggests they should? They do not. Using the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), I find that entry into marriage among both men and women aged 51-70 is associated with weight gain and exit from marriage with weight loss. I evaluate three additional theories with respect to the cross-sectional and longitudinal variation in the data. First, it may be that a broader set of shared risk factors (such as social obligations regarding meals) raises body mass for married couples. However, the shared risk factor model predicts that the intra-couple correlation should increase with respect to marital duration. Instead, it declines. Second, scholars have recently promoted a "crisis" model of marriage in which marital transitions, not marital status, determine differences in body mass. The crisis model is consistent with short-term effects seen for divorce, but not for the persistent weight gains associated with marriage or the persistent weight loss following widowhood. And transition models, in general, cannot explain significant cross-sectional differences across marital states in a population that is no longer experiencing many transitions, nor can it account for the prominent gender differences (in late middle-age, the heaviest group is unmarried women and the lightest are unmarried men). Third, I argue that pressures of the marriage market, in combination with gendered preferences regarding partner BMI, can account for all the longitudinal and cross-sectional patterns found in the data.
    Economics and human biology 05/2012; 10(4):431-53. DOI:10.1016/j.ehb.2012.04.012 · 2.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The prevalence of overweight and obesity has markedly increased during the past few decades. Stress has been suggested as one environmental factor that may contribute to the development of obesity. In this review, we discuss the role that exposure to chronic stress may play in the development of obesity, with particular attention to the effects of chronic psychosocial stress. Of particular importance is the effect that social stress has on dietary preference, food consumption, and regional distribution of adipose tissue. We present evidence from human and animal studies that links sympathetic nervous system and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity with visceral obesity, and that stress tends to alter the pattern of food consumption, and promotes craving of nutrient-dense "comfort foods." Lastly, we discuss the visible burrow system, a model of chronic social stress used in our laboratory to assess the effects of social subordination on behavioral and metabolic profile.
    03/2012; 1(1):16-25. DOI:10.1007/s13679-011-0006-3
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:: To examine the incidence of clinically significant weight gain 1 year after occupational back injury, and risk factors for that gain. METHODS:: A cohort of Washington State workers with wage-replacement benefits for back injuries completed baseline and 1-year follow-up telephone interviews. We obtained additional measures from claims and medical records. RESULTS:: Among 1263 workers, 174 (13.8%) reported clinically significant weight gain (≥7%) 1 year after occupational back injury. Women and workers who had more than 180 days on wage replacement at 1 year were twice as likely (adjusted odds ratio = 2.17, 95% confidence interval = 1.54 to 3.07; adjusted odds ratio = 2.40, 95% confidence interval = 1.63 to 3.53, respectively; both P < 0.001) to have clinically significant weight gain. CONCLUSIONS:: Women and workers on wage replacement for more than 180 days may be susceptible to clinically significant weight gain after occupational back injury.
    Journal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 12/2012; DOI:10.1097/JOM.0b013e31827943c6 · 1.80 Impact Factor
Show more