Influence of age, gender and severity of tremor on outcome after thalamic and subthalamic DBS for essential tremor
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Section of Neurosurgery, Umeå University, Sweden. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
(Impact Factor: 3.97).
06/2011; 17(8):617-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.05.014
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for essential tremor (ET). The nucleus ventralis intermedius thalami (Vim) is the target of choice, but promising results have been presented regarding DBS in the posterior subthalamic area (PSA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible influence of gender, age and severity of disease on the outcome of these procedures. Sixty eight patients (34 Vim, 34 PSA) with ET were included in this non-randomised study. Evaluation using the Essential Tremor Rating Scale (ETRS) was performed before, and one year after surgery concerning PSA DBS, and at a mean of 28 ± 24 months concerning Vim DBS. Items 5/6 and 11-14 (hand tremor and hand function) were selected for analysis of tremor outcome. The efficacy of DBS on essential tremor was not related to age or gender. Nor was it associated with the severity of tremor when the percentual reduction of tremor on stimulation was taken into account. However, patients with a more severe tremor at baseline had a higher degree of residual tremor on stimulation. Tremor in the treated hand and hand function were improved with 70% in the Vim group and 89% in the PSA group.
Available from: Amit Chopra
- "There are few studies comparing VIM and PSA targets for DBS treatment of ET. One retrospective study57 including 36 ET patients (17 VIM/19 PSA) with 44 DBS electrodes reported that the electrode contact providing the best effect in individual tremor control, measured by the ETRS, was located predominantly in the Zi or Raprl (54%) compared to VIM (12%). Another prospective study including 68 ET patients (34 VIM/34 PSA) reported improvement in hand tremor and hand function (measured by ETRS) by 70% in the VIM group compared to 89% in the PSA group,58 though the duration of follow-up varied between the two groups, with mean follow-up of 1 year for PSA DBS compared to 28 ± 24 months’ follow-up for VIM DBS, and this may have potentially affected the outcomes. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Deep-brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for medically refractory essential tremor (ET). This article reviews the current evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of DBS targets, including the ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus and posterior subthalamic area (PSA) in treatment of ET.
A structured PubMed search was performed through December 2012 with keywords "deep brain stimulation (DBS)," "essential tremor (ET)," "ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus," "posterior subthalamic area (PSA)," "safety," and "efficacy."
Based on level IV evidence, both VIM and PSA DBS targets appear to be safe and efficacious in ET patients in tremor reduction and improving activities of daily living, though the literature on PSA DBS is limited in terms of bilateral stimulation and long-term follow-up. DBS-related adverse effects are typically mild and stimulation-related. Hardware-related complications after DBS may not be uncommon, and often require additional surgical procedures. Few studies assessed quality-of-life and cognition outcomes in ET patients undergoing DBS stimulation.
DBS appears to be a safe and effective treatment for medically refractory ET. More systematic studies comparing VIM and PSA targets are needed to ascertain the most safe and effective DBS treatment for medically refractory ET. More research is warranted to assess quality-of-life and cognition outcomes in ET patients undergoing DBS.
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 12/2013; 9:1859-1865. DOI:10.2147/NDT.S32342 · 1.74 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Essential tremor (ET) is the most common movement disorder and often affects the quality of life. There are only a few studies evaluating the quality of life after deep brain stimulation (DBS).
This is a prospective study of 16 patients undergoing deep brain stimulation in the caudal Zona incerta (cZi). The quality of life was assessed with Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) and SF-36 scores, and the tremor was evaluated using the essential tremor rating scale (ETRS).
In the tremor rating, hand tremor on the treated side improved by 95%, hand function by 78% and activities of daily living by 71%. The QUEST score showed statistically significant improvements in the psychosocial and activities of daily living subscores. The SF-36 score did not show any significant improvement.
Although very good tremor reduction was achieved, the improvement in the quality of life scores was more modest. This could partly be explained by the quality of life being affected by other factors than the tremor itself.
Acta Neurochirurgica 11/2011; 154(3):495-9. DOI:10.1007/s00701-011-1230-z · 1.77 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Over past three decades, there has been a resurgence of interest in functional neurosurgery for movement disorders. Recently, thanks to the increased understanding of cellular pathophysiology and advances in technology and surgical techniques, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has essentially replaced ablative procedures for most of these conditions. Success of DBS treatment in the movement disorders depends on the recognized limitations in the medical treatment, our understanding of the anatomy and physiology of these disorders and, particularly, involvement of neurologists, neurosurgeons, clinical neurophysiologists and neuropsychiatrists in outcome studies of DBS surgery. Up to now, the exact mechanism of DBS is not fully understood. This review provides an overview of use of stereotactic neurosurgery, particularly DBS, for movement disorders, focusing mainly on the patient selection, target options, clinical outcome, adverse effects and possible mechanisms of DBS for advanced Parkinson's disease, dystonia, and essential tremor.
Journal of neurosurgical sciences 12/2011; 55(4):305-17. · 1.16 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.