Article

The Relationship of Obesity and Gender Prevalence Changes in United States Inpatient Nephrolithiasis

University of California, San Diego Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, San Diego, CA 92103-8897, USA.
Urology (Impact Factor: 2.13). 06/2011; 78(5):1029-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.011
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To review the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database to examine the relationships between obesity, gender, and nephrolithiasis. Recent reports indicate that the prevalence of nephrolithiasis has been increasing, especially among women.
The Nationwide Inpatient Sample contains data on approximately 20% of hospital stays in the United States. Included in this analysis were discharges with primary diagnosis ICD-9 codes 592.0 (renal calculus) or 592.1 (ureteral calculus), from 1998 through 2003. All raw data were weighted to produce national estimates. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed to determine changes in nephrolithiasis prevalence and associations of obesity and other comorbidities with nephrolithiasis.
We reviewed 181,092,957 hospital stays (weighted data). The prevalence of nephrolithiasis was relatively stable: 0.52% (149,302) in 1998 and 0.47% (147,541) in 2003. The prevalence of obesity increased from 3.06% (878,155) to 4.99% (1,575,247). The male:female ratio of patients with stones decreased from 1.6:1 to 1.2:1. Multivariate analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship (OR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.20-1.23, P <.001) between obesity and urinary stones. Obese females were more likely to develop stones than nonobese females (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.33-1.37, P <.001). The association between obesity and stones was weaker in males (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06, P <.001).
In this sample of inpatients, obesity was associated with a significantly increased prevalence of urinary stones. This relationship was stronger in females than in males. Further studies are needed to determine whether weight reduction in obese patients affects urinary stone disease.

0 Followers
 · 
62 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Overgrowth of calcium oxalate on Randall's plaque is a mechanism of stone formation among idiopathic calcium oxalate stone-formers (ICSFs). It is less clear how stones form when there is little or no plaque. Design, setting, participants, & measurements Participants were a consecutive cohort of ICSFs who underwent percutaneous nephroscopic papillary mapping in the kidney or kidneys containing symptomatic stones and a papillary tip biopsy from a representative calyx during a stone removal procedure between 2009 and 2013. The distribution of Randall's plaque coverage was analyzed and used to divide ICSFs into those with a high (>= 5%; mean, 10.5%; n=10) versus low (<5%; mean, 1.5%; n=32) amount of plaque coverage per papilla. Demographic and laboratory features were compared between these two groups. Results Low-plaque stone formers tended to be obese (50% versus 10%; P=0.03) and have a history of urinary tract infection (34% versus 0%; P=0.04). They were less likely to have multiple prior stone events (22% versus 80%; P=0.002) and had a lower mean 24-hour urine calcium excretion (187 +/- 86 mg versus 291 +/- 99 mg; P<0.01). Morphologically, stones from patients with low amounts of plaque lacked a calcium phosphate core by micro-computed tomography. Papillary biopsies from low plaque stone-formers revealed less interstitial and basement membrane punctate crystallization. Conclusions These findings suggest that other pathways independent of Randall's plaque may contribute to stone pathogenesis among a subgroup of ICSFs who harbor low amounts of plaque.
    Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 08/2014; 9(10). DOI:10.2215/CJN.01490214 · 5.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Urolithiasis is a common disease that affects urinary tract in all age groups. Both in adults and in children, stone size, location, renal anatomy, and other factors, can influence the success of treatment modalities. Recently, there has been a great advancement in technology for minimally invasive management of urinary stones. The epoch of open treatment modalities has passed and currently there are much less invasive treatment approaches, such as percutaneous nephrolithotomy, ureteroscopy, shockwave lithotripsy, and retrograde internal Surgery. Furthermore, advancement in imaging technics ensures substantial knowledge that permit physician to decide the most convenient treatment method for the patient. Thus, effective and rapid treatment of urinary tract stones is substantial for the preservation of the renal function. In this review, the effects of the treatment options for urinary stones on renal function have been reviewed.
    05/2015; 4(2):271-6. DOI:10.5527/wjn.v4.i2.271
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The prevalence of urolithiasis and its risk factors such as obesity and diabetes have increased over time.
    European Urology 07/2014; 66(4). DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.036 · 12.48 Impact Factor