Article

Pediatric emergency health care providers' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences regarding emergency contraception.

Division of Emergency Medical Services, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Academic Emergency Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.2). 06/2011; 18(6):605-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01079.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The objective was to describe knowledge, attitudes, and experiences regarding emergency contraception (EC) among pediatric emergency health care providers (HCPs).
This multicenter, focus group study elicited thoughts and experiences from pediatric emergency HCPs about EC. Participants were physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs), and nurses in one of three urban, geographically distinct, pediatric emergency departments (EDs). A professional moderator used a semistructured format for sessions, which were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed for recurrent themes. Participants provided demographic information and completed a written survey evaluating EC knowledge.
Eighty-five HCPs (41 physicians, eight NPs, and 36 nurses) participated in 12 focus groups. Overall knowledge about EC was poor. Participants identified barriers including cost, privacy, knowledge, and provider refusal. Provision of EC for adolescents was supported by the majority of physicians and NPs; however, many nurses were not supportive, especially following consensual intercourse. The authors identified use of social judgment by nurses as a novel barrier to EC provision. The majority of HCPs did not support screening for potential EC need. The majority of physicians and NPs felt obligated to provide adolescents with all contraceptive options, while more nurses supported provider refusal to provide EC.
This study identified important HCP perceptions and barriers about EC provision in the pediatric ED. These findings may inform future efforts to improve EC provision for adolescents. Specifically, future studies to evaluate the differences in attitudes between nurses, physicians, and NPs, and the use of social judgment in EC provision, are warranted.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jennifer Lynn Reed, Oct 21, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
109 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Urban adolescents face many barriers to health care that contribute to health disparities in rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and unintended pregnancy. Designing interventions to increase access to health care is a complex process that requires understanding the perspectives of adolescents. We conducted six focus groups to explore the attitudes and beliefs about general and sexual health care access as well as barriers to care among urban, economically disadvantaged adolescents. Participants first completed a written survey assessing health behaviors, health care utilization, and demographics. The discussion guide was based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and its constructs: attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. Transcripts of group discussions were analyzed using directed content analysis with triangulation and consensus to resolve differences. Fifty youth participated (mean age 15.5 years; 64% female; 90% African American). Many (23%) reported missed health care in the previous year. About half (53%) reported previous sexual intercourse; of these, 35% reported no previous sexual health care. Youth valued adults as important referents for accessing care as well as multiple factors that increased comfort such as good communication skills, and an established relationship. However, many reported mistrust of physicians and identified barriers to accessing care including fear and lack of time. Most felt that accessing sexual health care was more difficult than general care. These findings could inform future interventions to improve access to care and care-seeking behaviors among disadvantaged youth.
    Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies 07/2014; 9(3):279-290. DOI:10.1080/17450128.2014.925170
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrheae, and Trichomonas vaginalis and to describe factors associated with sexually transmitted infection (STI) in a pediatric emergency department (ED). Adolescents aged 14 to 19 years presenting to a Midwestern pediatric ED were asked to provide urine for STI testing and complete a survey about previous sexual activity (PSA), high-risk behaviors, demographics, and visit reason (reproductive: genitourinary complaints, abdominal pain, or a female with vomiting). Comparisons between subgroups were analyzed using Χ test. Among 200 subjects (64% of approached), mean age was 15.6 years; 63% were female. Eleven subjects (6%; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-8.7) tested positive for 1 or more STIs: 10 for C. trachomatis (one denied PSA), 3 for T. vaginalis (all coinfected with C. trachomatis), and 1 for N. gonorrheae. Half reported PSA; of these, 71% reported 1 or more high-risk behaviors, most commonly first sex before the age of 15 years (51%) and no condom at last sex (42%). Among those with PSA and nonreproductive visit (n = 73), 11.0% had 1 or more STIs (95% confidence interval, 3.4-18.1). Two factors were associated with greater likelihood of positive STI test result, namely, reporting PSA versus no PSA (10% vs 1%, P = 0.005) and last sex within 1 month or less versus more than 1 month (20% vs 0%, P = 0.001). In this sample, none of the following characteristics were associated with STI: insurance, race, high-risk behaviors, age, or ED visit reason. Approximately 1 in 10 sexually active adolescent ED patients without reproductive complaints had 1 or more STIs. This suggests the need for strategies to increase STI testing for this population.
    Pediatric Emergency Care 02/2015; 31(2):107-12. DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000000284 · 0.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Family planning remains a high priority area for the United States, with goals to increase the proportion of pregnancies that are intended, reduce pregnancy rates among adolescents, and increase contraceptive use prioritized in the Healthy People 2020 objectives. Contraception intended for use after unprotected intercourse, known as emergency contraception, remains underutilized. Levonorgestrel is one method of oral emergency contraception, which prevents fertilization and does not disrupt an already established pregnancy; thus, timing of administration is critical. Despite data demonstrating safety and efficacy, evidence-based decision making has been overshadowed by politically charged actions involving levonorgestrel emergency contraception for over a decade. The Women's Health Practice and Research Network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy supports expanded access to levonorgestrel emergency contraception and removal of barriers such as age restrictions on the nonprescription drug product. Pharmacists remain a key provider of emergency contraceptive services and can help ensure timely access. In states where direct pharmacy access to emergency contraception is available, pharmacists are encouraged to participate. Education, research, and advocacy are other important responsibilities for pharmacists in this arena.
    Pharmacotherapy 05/2013; 33(5). DOI:10.1002/phar.1229 · 2.20 Impact Factor