Article

Quantitative evaluations of ankle spasticity and stiffness in neurological disorders using manual spasticity evaluator

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development (Impact Factor: 1.69). 01/2011; 48(4):473-81. DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2010.04.0053
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Spasticity and contracture are major sources of disability in people with neurological impairments that have been evaluated using various instruments: the Modified Ashworth Scale, tendon reflex scale, pendulum test, mechanical perturbations, and passive joint range of motion (ROM). These measures generally are either convenient to use in clinics but not quantitative or they are quantitative but difficult to use conveniently in clinics. We have developed a manual spasticity evaluator (MSE) to evaluate spasticity/contracture quantitatively and conveniently, with ankle ROM and stiffness measured at a controlled low velocity and joint resistance and Tardieu catch angle measured at several higher velocities. We found that the Tardieu catch angle was linearly related to the velocity, indicating that increased resistance at higher velocities was felt at further stiffer positions and, thus, that the velocity dependence of spasticity may also be position-dependent. This finding indicates the need to control velocity in spasticity evaluation, which is achieved with the MSE. Quantitative measurements of spasticity, stiffness, and ROM can lead to more accurate characterizations of pathological conditions and outcome evaluations of interventions, potentially contributing to better healthcare services for patients with neurological disorders such as cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, and stroke.

1 Follower
 · 
85 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The function of lower-extremity rehabilitation robotics usually includes standing up movements. These standing up movements can cause spasticity in people with disabilities of the lower extremities. In this paper, we review the spasticity and the methods of existing systems for handling the spasticity of people with physical disabilities. We observe and detect the spasticity via the EMG signals of the lower extremities of a subject with paraplegia. Through this process, we are able to suggest ways to deal with risk factors, such as spasticity, when using rehabilitation robots.
    Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI), 2012 9th International Conference on; 01/2012
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents the pediAnklebot, an impedance-controlled low-friction, backdriveable robotic device developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that trains the ankle of neurologically impaired children of ages 6-10 years old. The design attempts to overcome the known limitations of the lower extremity robotics and the unknown difficulties of what constitutes an appropriate therapeutic interaction with children. The robot’s pilot clinical evaluation is on-going and it incorporates our recent findings on the ankle sensorimotor control in neurologically intact subjects, namely the speed-accuracy tradeoff, the deviation from an ideally smooth ankle trajectory, and the reaction time. We used these concepts to develop the kinematic and kinetic performance metrics that guided the ankle therapy in a similar fashion that we have done for our upper extremity devices. Here we report on the use of the device in at least 9 training sessions for 3 neurologically impaired children. Results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the performance metrics assessing explicit and implicit motor learning. Based on these initial results, we are confident that the device will become an effective tool that harnesses plasticity to guide habilitation during childhood.
    IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 03/2015; DOI:10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2410773 · 2.82 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article provides a comprehensive review of studies that investigated ankle assessment techniques to better understand those that can be used in the real-time monitoring of rehabilitation progress for implementation in conjunction with robot-assisted therapy. Seventy-six publications published between January 1980 and August 2013 were selected based on eight databases. They were divided into two main categories (16 qualitative and 60 quantitative studies): 13 goniometer studies, 18 dynamometer studies, and 29 studies about innovative techniques. A total of 465 subjects participated in the 29 quantitative studies of innovative measurement techniques that may potentially be integrated in a real-time monitoring device, of which 19 studies included less than 10 participants. Results show that qualitative ankle assessment methods are not suitable for real-time monitoring in robot-assisted therapy, though they are reliable for certain patients, while the quantitative methods show great potential. The majority of quantitative techniques are reliable in measuring ankle kinematics and kinetics but are usually available only for use in the sagittal plane. Limited studies determine kinematics and kinetics in all three planes (sagittal, transverse, and frontal) where motions of the ankle joint and the subtalar joint actually occur.
    The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 01/2014; 51(4):517-534. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2013.03.0066 · 1.69 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
13 Downloads
Available from
Sep 10, 2014
Available from