Factors associated with asthma control among adults in five New England states, 2006-2007.

Asthma Program, Health Education Management and Surveillance Section, Connecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford, CT, USA.
Journal of Asthma (Impact Factor: 1.85). 06/2011; 48(6):581-8. DOI: 10.3109/02770903.2011.576744
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Despite the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines that specify the goals of asthma control and management strategies, the number of patients with uncontrolled asthma remains high, and factors associated with uncontrolled asthma are unknown.
The aim was to examine the relationship between asthma control and socio-demographic characteristics, health-care access and use, asthma education, and medication use among adults with active asthma residing in New England.
Data from the 2006-2007 Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System Adult Asthma Call-Back Survey were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression. Asthma control was categorized as "well controlled," "not well controlled," or "very poorly controlled" according to the NAEPP guidelines.
Of the respondents (n = 3079), 30% met the criteria for well-controlled asthma, 46% for not well-controlled asthma, and 24% for very poorly controlled asthma. Being of Hispanic ethnicity (odds ratio [OR] = 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-13.7), unemployed or unable to work (OR = 17.9; 95% CI = 6.0-53.4), high school educated or less (OR = 2.8; 95% CI = 1.6-4.7), current smokers (OR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.3-5.1), or being unable to see a doctor or specialist for asthma care or unable to buy medication for asthma because of cost (OR = 7.6; 95% CI = 3.4-17.1) were associated with very poorly controlled asthma. In addition, having Coronary Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (OR = 2.6; 95% CI = 1.5-4.5), two or more routine checkups for asthma (OR = 4.5; 95% CI = 2.3-8.9), or an emergency department visit, urgent care facility visit, and hospitalization in the past year (OR = 3.9; 95% CI = 2.1-7.3) were also associated with having very poorly controlled asthma. Using controller medication in the past year (OR = 2.6; 95% CI = 1.6-4.2) and taking a course on how to manage asthma (OR = 3.0; 95% CI = 1.2-7.8) were significantly associated with poor asthma control.
The high prevalence (70%) of not well-controlled asthma and poorly controlled asthma in this study emphasizes the need to identify factors associated with poor asthma control for development of targeted intervention. A health policy of increasing asthma education, health-care access, and smoking cessation may be effective and result in better asthma control and management.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patient activation, an individual's knowledge, skills, and confidence for managing their own health and health care, can play an important role in the management of chronic conditions. However, few studies have examined patient activation in underserved rural communities. The purpose of this study was to describe patient activation and examine how patient activation is associated with adherence to asthma maintenance medication and disease control in a low-income rural population with asthma. We conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey with 98 adults. Patient activation was assessed with the Patient Activation Measure. Adherence to long-term controller (LTC) medications and asthma control were examined using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) and Asthma Control Test (ACT). Multivariate regression analyses were used to assess the associations between patient activation and: (1) adherence to LTC medications and (2) asthma control. The majority of participants (50%) were classified in the highest level of patient activation. The least activated participants had lower mean MMAS and ACT scores in comparison to participants who were classified in higher patient activation levels. Multivariate analyses found significant positive associations between patient activation and adherence and asthma control. Patient activation may be instrumental in low-income rural patients' use of asthma medication and disease control. Study results inform interventions to help patients use asthma medications appropriately and achieve better asthma control. In addition to increasing access to health care services in rural communities, health care professionals also may develop and implement strategies to positively impact rural patients' involvement in care.
    The Journal of Rural Health 04/2014; 30(2):121-7. · 1.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite effective medications, asthma remains a significant burden to the US health care system. To determine whether partly and uncontrolled asthma in respondents to the Asthma Insights and Management (AIM) survey was associated with adverse outcomes (such as visits to health care professionals and medication use) compared with well-controlled asthma. The AIM survey, conducted in 2009, included 2,500 patients with asthma who were 12 years or older. We classified patients into levels of control and compared use of health care services and limitations of activities in patients whose asthma was well controlled vs those with partly and uncontrolled asthma. Patients who reported lower income and educational status and lacked health insurance were less likely to have had well-controlled asthma. Respondents with uncontrolled asthma were more likely to report ever use of oral steroids (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-3.2) and over-the-counter medicine (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 2.0-3.7) compared with patients whose asthma was well controlled. Respondents with partly and uncontrolled asthma were also significantly more likely to report ever visiting physicians, specialists, or the emergency department or being hospitalized for asthma compared with those whose asthma was well controlled (ORs ranging from 2.1 to 5.6). Finally, respondents whose asthma was uncontrolled had increased odds (ORs ranging from 14 to 34) of reporting that asthma limited their activities compared with respondents whose asthma was well controlled. Patients with partly and uncontrolled asthma defined by international guidelines reported use of significantly more health care resources and greater limitations of their daily activities compared with patients whose asthma was well controlled.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology: official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology 10/2012; 109(4):260-265.e2. · 3.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objectives: The available assessment tools to determine asthma control do not include components assessing factors that may directly affect control. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between patient compliance, inhaler technique and the level of asthma control. Methods: Scores from the Asthma Control Test, individual inhaler device checklists and a novel questionnaire on the patient's medication regimen were used to measure control, inhaler technique and compliance, respectively, in patients with asthma attending Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman during a three month period. Results: All of the 218 patients were receiving inhaled steroids, either in combination with long-acting beta agonists (86.2%) or alone. Asthma control was good in 92 (42.2%) patients; with 38 males (50%) and 54 females (38%), respectively (P = 0.059). Compliance and inhaler technique were poor in 40.8% (89) and 18.3% (40) of the patients. Sixty percent (36) of the patients with good and 59.4% (41) with partial compliance had good control (P <0.001) while 83.1% (74) with poor compliance had poor control. Of the 92 patients with good control, 86 (93.5%) exhibited good inhaler techniques. In contrast, 85% (34) of the patients with poor inhaler techniques demonstrated poor control (odds ratio [OR] = 5.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.05-14.8; P <0.001). A total of 93.3% (56) with good and 89.9% (62) with partial compliance demonstrated good inhaler techniques (P <0.001). In patients with good control, 35 (38%) exhibited both good inhaler techniques and compliance and 38 (41.3%) had a good technique and partial compliance. Conclusion: Patients with good inhaler techniques and compliance have better control of their asthma. Asthma control will remain suboptimal unless the reasons for this lack of control are identified, assessed and eliminated. We recommend that inhaler technique assessment and measurements of patient compliance with their prescribed treatments should be considered for inclusion in the current assessment tools.
    Journal of Asthma 12/2013; · 1.85 Impact Factor


Available from