Electronic Memorandum Decreases Unnecessary Antimicrobial Use for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Culture-Negative Pyuria

Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts 02132, USA.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 4.18). 07/2011; 32(7):644-8. DOI: 10.1086/660764
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Asymptomatic bacteriuria/candidiuria (ASB) and culture-negative pyuria (CNP) are common and often result in inappropriate antibiotic use. We aimed to evaluate whether a standardized educational memorandum could reduce antimicrobial utilization for ASB/CNP.
Quasi-experimental study with a control group, from a convenience sample of inpatients with abnormal urinalysis or urine culture results in a Veterans Affairs hospital.
An educational memorandum outlining guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of ASB was placed in the chart of patients with ASB/CNP who were receiving antimicrobials.
The records of patients meeting inclusion criteria were abstracted for demographics, comorbidities, antimicrobials, and symptoms suggestive of possible urinary tract infection (UTI). Patients were categorized as having ASB, CNP, or UTI. The number of antimicrobial-days attributed to ASB/CNP was compared between the control group and the intervention group.
Charts of 301 patients with abnormal urine results were reviewed. Thirty of 117 (26%) patients in the control group received antimicrobials for ASB/CNP for an average of 6.3 days. In the intervention group, 24 of 92 (26%) patients received antimicrobials for ASB/CNP for an average of 2.2 days (t-test: P < .001). Adverse events from antimicrobials for ASB/CNP occurred in 3 of the 30 (10%) patients in the control group. There were no adverse events from untreated ASB/CNP in the intervention group.
ASB and CNP resulted in antimicrobial exposure in more than one-quarter of our study patients. Placing a standardized memorandum in the electronic record was associated with a 65% relative reduction in antimicrobial-days for ASB and CNP.

Download full-text


Available from: Kalpana Gupta, Feb 11, 2015
28 Reads
  • Source
    • "The findings in our study are also comparable to studies utilizing both educational and non-educational interventions (11–15, 18–20). Our study, like others, involved pre- and post-intervention assessments of inappropriate treatment (11, 14). Furthermore, the studies strived to maintain similar pre- and post-intervention populations in terms of their baseline characteristics, and had similar exclusion criteria as to which sub-sets of the population should be treated for ASB (1). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The goal of this study was to assess the overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) in hospitalized patients, calculate the total costs of inappropriate treatment, and determine if a multi-faceted educational intervention was effective in reducing the overtreatment of ASB in a resource-limited community hospital. The study encompassed three phases: a retrospective pre-intervention assessment of the baseline cost and treatment of ASB, the implementation of a multi-faceted educational intervention, and a prospective post-intervention assessment of the efficacy of the intervention. A positive urine culture was defined by bacterial counts ≥10(5) cfu/mL. In the pre-intervention group, 64 (83%) of 109 patients were asymptomatic: 30 (47%) were treated. In the post-intervention group, 13 (17%) of 55 patients were asymptomatic: 2 (15%) were treated, (p=0.04). Fewer urine cultures were collected during the post-intervention period than the pre-intervention period (3,127 and 3,419, respectively) (p<0.001). The total cost of inappropriately treating ASB in the pre-intervention group was $1200 compared to $600 in the post-intervention group. The results demonstrated a significant decrease in the inappropriate treatment of ASB and the associated costs.
    07/2012; 2(2). DOI:10.3402/jchimp.v2i2.17814
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) is a condition in which bacteria are present in a noncontaminated urine sample collected from a patient without signs or symptoms related to the urinary tract. ABU must be distinguished from symptomatic UTI by the absence of signs and symptoms compatible with UTI or by clinical determination that a nonurinary etiology accounts for the patient's symptoms. Interactions between the organism, the host, and the bladder environment determine whether bacteriuria leads to ABU or to UTI. ABU is a very common condition that is often treated unnecessarily with antibiotics-it should be detected and treated in pregnant women and patients undergoing urologic surgery, but in most other patient groups, treatment does not confer benefit and can be harmful. A change in prescribing behavior for ABU has been achieved through several fairly high-intensity interventions, such as interactive educational sessions for physicians, but whether these improvements persist beyond the study period is not known. Further research is needed to determine whether screening for and treatment of ABU is beneficial in patients with renal transplants, patients with orthotopic neobladders, patients undergoing prosthetic joint implantation, and patients with neutropenia.
    Nature Reviews Urology 12/2011; 9(2):85-93. DOI:10.1038/nrurol.2011.192 · 4.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The literature suggests that positive results of catheter urine cultures frequently lead to unnecessary antimicrobial prescribing, which therefore represents an important target for stewardship. To assess the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in response to the results of urine cultures from patients with indwelling urinary catheters. This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care centre and involved adults with indwelling urinary catheters from whom urine specimens were obtained for culture. Patients with positive or negative culture results were identified from microbiology laboratory reports. The medical records of consecutive patients were screened to select a sample of 80 inpatients (40 per group). Abstracted patient histories were independently evaluated by an expert panel of 3 infectious diseases consultants blinded to the decisions of prescribers and of fellow panelists. The primary end point was concordance of each patient's treatment decision (with respect to the indication) between the expert panel (based on majority agreement, i.e., at least 2 of the 3 expert panelists) and the prescriber. The secondary end points were unnecessary days of therapy and selected outcomes over a predefined period after urine was obtained for culture. A total of 591 charts were screened to generate the targeted number of patients. Baseline demographic characteristics were comparable for the 2 groups, except antibiotic exposure before urine collection was significantly more frequent for the group with negative culture results. The treatment decision was concordant in 40% (16/40) of the patients with a positive culture result and 85% (34/40) of those with a negative culture result ( < 0.001). The most common reason for discordance was administration of antibiotics when not indicated (23 of 24 patients with a positive result and 5 of 6 patients with a negative result), which accounted for 165 and 32 unnecessary days of therapy per 1000 inpatient-days, respectively ( < 0.001). Adverse effects occurred in 2 of the 23 patients with a positive result who received antibiotics that were not indicated. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing, as measured by concordance of decisions between the expert panel and prescribers, was more common among patients with negative urine culture results than among those with positive results. However, there is an opportunity to improve prescribing for both groups through antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. Unnecessary days of therapy and adverse effects were more common in patients with a positive culture result.
    The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy 03/2013; 66(1):13-20. DOI:10.4212/cjhp.v66i1.1207
Show more